Charles County Sportsman's Club Range Public Hearing

Chris0nllyn

Well-Known Member
THE BOARD OF APPEALS FOR CHARLES COUNTY, MARYLAND has been petitioned by St. Charles Sportsman’s Club for a Special Exception for a rifle and pistol range, war games, archery ranges or other recreation using weapons, as provided in Article XIII, Section 297-212 (Use No. 4.02.290) and Article XXV, Section 297-415 of the Charles County Zoning Ordinance. The subject property, as shown on Tax Map 30, Grid 14, Parcel 86, is located at Smallwood Church Road, approximately 800 feet southeast of Maryland Route 224 in the Rural Conservation (RC) Zone on approximately 322.572 acres. The Board is hereby giving notice that a Public Hearing will be held on this matter in the Commissioners Meeting Room of the Charles County Government Building, La Plata, Maryland,

Tuesday, May 27, 2014 at 7:00 p.m.


BOARD OF APPEALS FOR
CHARLES COUNTY, MARYLAND

http://www.charlescountymd.gov/public-notices/st-charles-sportsman’s-club-special-exception
 

b23hqb

Well-Known Member
Is this a good thing for the area, or is there a shortage of shooting ranges in the area? Just curious, being a gunner myself. 800 feet from a highway is not a lot of distance if a bullet strays the wrong way.
 

officeguy

Well-Known Member
Is this a good thing for the area, or is there a shortage of shooting ranges in the area? Just curious, being a gunner myself. 800 feet from a highway is not a lot of distance if a bullet strays the wrong way.

There is a shortage of good ranges in the area. The club had a facility in Waldorf but encroaching development made it unusable. A properly constructed range with a backstop and overhead baffles is no risk to the surrounding properties. Projectiles either go into the ground, the backstop (typically a hillside or an artifical backtop built from sand or shredded tires) or the overhead baffles (boards that go across the range to catch any shots fired too high). A range is however a source of noise that will impact surrounding properties.

As a shooting sports enthusiast, I am in full support of building this range. If I was a immediate neighbor, I would fight it tooth and nail ;-)
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
As a shooting sports enthusiast, I am in full support of building this range. If I was a immediate neighbor, I would fight it tooth and nail ;-)

What a completely honest position looks like ---^ I agree on both counts. I'm lucky enough to have a couple places to shoot regularly where nobody is bothered, but its also true I've almost completely ceased target shooting on my island property due to the inevitable calls to the sheriffs office.
 

officeguy

Well-Known Member
What a completely honest position looks like ---^ I agree on both counts. I'm lucky enough to have a couple places to shoot regularly where nobody is bothered, but its also true I've almost completely ceased target shooting on my island property due to the inevitable calls to the sheriffs office.

Parcel 86 is a 322acre piece of forest owned by a 'Heartwood Forestland Fund'. It borders a couple other 250acre parcels of forest. I haven't found the time to pull up the hearing documents as to where exactly they want to build the range, but with that large of a piece of property, there is a chance that they can minimize the impact on the closest residential properties.

Anyway, I'm all for it :)
 

officeguy

Well-Known Member
As for there being a shortage of shooting ranges, there is Myrtle Grove shooting range just a couple of miles away from the proposed site. As for stray bullets going the wrong way, I'd be concerned about the gun range being so close to Lackey High School, which is less than a mile or so from the proposed range. A 22 bullet can travel a mile-and-a-half if discharged into the air by an errant or accidental shot; imagine how far a 30-06 could go. As I recall, there was an accidental shooting at the club's Waldorf gun range a couple of years ago. Also, there are some 450 members in the St. Charles Sportsman's Club. Imagine all the traffic this shooting range would generate, not to mention a constant "BOOM...BOOM...BOOM."

If true and they barely got 5 members to show up for the zoning meeting, I doubt that all 450 will show up at the same time to shoot at the range.

The Myrtle Grove range is heavily used and it is only a couple of 100ft from residential properties along Hawthorne Rd and Ripley Park Drive. The risk to the surrounding community from a properly designed range is very low. Shots go either into the ground, the backstop or the baffles. The recent incident down in St Marys was sheriffs deputies shooting in a gravel pit which is a bad idea all around because it will create ricochets that can make it into the surrounding community.
 

officeguy

Well-Known Member
No, I am talking about an incident that happened around 2010 or 2011 in which a St. Charles Sportsman's Club member accidentally shot and killed himself while shooting at one of the club's ranges in Waldorf. I don't recall if it was the outdoor range they had (now closed) or the indoor range which they still have. I am sure the incident could be googled.

Right, but what zoning implications does such an event have ?

If there was a history of surrounding properties getting peppered with stray bullets, it would be relevant for the decision to allow the same club to build a new range. But an accident inside of the range has no bearing on the surrounding properties.
 

nutz

Well-Known Member
Parcel 86 is a 322acre piece of forest owned by a 'Heartwood Forestland Fund'. It borders a couple other 250acre parcels of forest. I haven't found the time to pull up the hearing documents as to where exactly they want to build the range, but with that large of a piece of property, there is a chance that they can minimize the impact on the closest residential properties.

Anyway, I'm all for it :)

You may want to take another look at your map. There is one 250 acre parcel owned by a partnership (who oppose the range) and the other large parcel is a Charles County Park and Recreation site (old Pisgah landfill). The The 322+ acre site is bordered on 3 sides by residential development.
 

glhs837

Power with Control
If I recall right, the idea that lead from the bullets will cause harm has been shown to be bogus also. I think, if I recall correctly, there was research done on ranges in use for 50-60 years, and they found the lead migration from bullets was less than an inch after all that time. might even have been one half inch.
 

nutz

Well-Known Member
If I recall right, the idea that lead from the bullets will cause harm has been shown to be bogus also. I think, if I recall correctly, there was research done on ranges in use for 50-60 years, and they found the lead migration from bullets was less than an inch after all that time. might even have been one half inch.

Some light reading for your enjoyment.

https://www.nssf.org/ranges/rangeresources/library/NSRS/04PolicyTrack/LeadMobility.pdf
http://www2.epa.gov/lead/best-management-practices-lead-outdoor-shooting-ranges
http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2020353191_gunrangeleadxml.html
 

Vince

......
Wish they'd put another range down here that doesn't take an hour drive. Sanners doesn't have a rifle range or I'd join there.
 

glhs837

Power with Control
Some light reading for your enjoyment.

https://www.nssf.org/ranges/rangeresources/library/NSRS/04PolicyTrack/LeadMobility.pdf


"Most outdoor shooting ranges probably do not have adverse environmental impacts
caused by lead; however, conditions may exist that could result in such impacts"


http://www2.epa.gov/lead/best-management-practices-lead-outdoor-shooting-ranges


this one talks about movement in generalities, but really doesnt say much beyond that incertain soils, lead breaks down faster, no numbers given. Mostly it's a primer in how environmental folks can use the power of govt to force ranges to do what they want.


http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2020353191_gunrangeleadxml.html


And this one is about workers rehabbing an indoor range, has no bearing on lead migration.


After further reading, not the above, it seems the soil is the key, with highly acidic soils leading to more breakdown. But in any case, barring shooting in wetlands, it's not a large concern, I dont think.
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
After reading through the material at the links, I found the punch line:

Most outdoor shooting ranges probably do not have adverse environmental impacts
caused by lead; however, conditions may exist that could result in such impacts

Our private (club) rifle/pistol range is only 100 yards too. Pretty useless for rifles I own..our separate skeet range is the only one that gets a lot of use. I wish there was a long-distance rifle range around here; I guess a lot of people wish that.
 

glhs837

Power with Control
I would imagine the soil on the property would be rather acidic, since it is supposedly "mostly pine." As for wetlands, the map does indicate streams and swamps on the property, and a large pond in a residential property which borders the property.

In which case, simple abatement procedures would be called for.
 

Lurk

Happy Creepy Ass Cracka
Also, there are some 450 members in the St. Charles Sportsman's Club. Imagine all the traffic this shooting range would generate, not to mention a constant "BOOM...BOOM...BOOM."

There are about 60 members of the St Charles Sportsman's Club. Absence of a shooting range has caused numerous members to leave the club.
 

Lurk

Happy Creepy Ass Cracka
If true and they barely got 5 members to show up for the zoning meeting, I doubt that all 450 will show up at the same time to shoot at the range.

The membership of the club was told to not sign up and testify at the hearing because the lawyer and current President had a "Tight" agenda that included a well scripted gaggle of speakers. Unfortunately, the tree huggers and their neighbors came in en masse like the tree huggers did for the Septic Bill lynchings.
 

nutz

Well-Known Member
After reading through the material at the links, I found the punch line:



Our private (club) rifle/pistol range is only 100 yards too. Pretty useless for rifles I own..our separate skeet range is the only one that gets a lot of use. I wish there was a long-distance rifle range around here; I guess a lot of people wish that.

Yes, a long distance range closer by would be great.
 

nutz

Well-Known Member
The membership of the club was told to not sign up and testify at the hearing because the lawyer and current President had a "Tight" agenda that included a well scripted gaggle of speakers. Unfortunately, the tree huggers and their neighbors came in en masse like the tree huggers did for the Septic Bill lynchings.

Unfortunately, once again, the club did not do their homework. There were not any tree huggers at the meeting that I heard speak. There were lots of concerned neighbors worried about noise, their pets, children and property. Of course, your own John Smith telling them how stupid they are was a great PR move. The property selected is not suitable for any sort of firing range. Didn't you notice that it is bordered by housing and a public park?

The club is emitting the perception that they are a low budget, back woods operation without foresight and proper planning. It's been close to what, 15 years, since they had an outdoor range? According to their website this morning, "Our outdoor range is also in the process of relocation, and should return to operations some time in 2011." http://www.stcharlessc.com/
 
Last edited:

Midnightrider

Well-Known Member
Unfortunately, once again, the club did not do their homework. There were not any tree huggers at the meeting that I heard speak. There were lots of concerned neighbors worried about noise, their pets, children and property. Of course, your own John Smith telling them how stupid they are was a great PR move. The property selected is not suitable for any sort of firing range. Didn't you notice that it is bordered by housing and a public park?

The club is emitting the perception that they are a low budget, back woods operation without foresight and proper planning. It's been close to what, 15 years, since they had an outdoor range? According to their website this morning, "Our outdoor range is also in the process of relocation, and should return to operations some time in 2011." http://www.stcharlessc.com/

an outdoor range can operate safely bordering housing and a park. the range just needs to institute engineering solutions that prevent rounds from escaping the range. With proper planninig, design, and oversight the risks to the neighbors are very limited. the annoyance and discomfort of hearing shots ring out are a different matter all together.
 
Top