So when proven wrong you throw out an insult. Taking a page right out of Trump's book like a good little sheep
Chelsea tweets; gets roasted
- Thread starter vraiblonde
- Start date
So when proven wrong you throw out an insult. Taking a page right out of Trump's book like a good little sheep
Chris0nllyn
Well-Known Member
Depends . Most gun control advocates use 4 people to be considerd a "mass" shooting. (Which used to artificially raise the number of "mass" shootings in the US). If some gang banger shoots up a street corner with 4 other gang bangers on it, that's considered a mass shooting.
That being said, and using that metric, there have been 2. Monash University and the Hunt family murders.
You should be forced to leave simply because your IQ is too low.
This is really too dumb to even be answering but why would you ever think I said that?
If I feed a stray dog on the street do i go home and beat my dog to death in exchange?
You probably would. The rest of us?...probably not.
The only thing he ever fought was his little sister.
Whenever you see ANTIFA on the television, Sappy/Ollyn/LibertyBeacon/TJ/Seven/Whateverthe####itcallsitself is right there.
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
What part was fake news. Crime has risen and so have homicides.
The FBI defines it as the murder of four or more people so neither of those are typically included
Trying to conflate that with the lack of a mass shooting event since the ban.
That's what you are professing.
Take rights from people that harm no one, allowing crime to escalate in the vacuum and all so you can feel artificially safe.
A trade made for an unprovable result.
Actually, the 4+ gang-banger IS included in the data.
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
Well just like we have said over and over in here if you take guns people will just find another way to kill.
On January 17 2017 a mass killer drove a truck into a hotel and kill 6 and injured 20 more.
So they took the guns. all they did was leave the innocent unarmed. They did not stop mass killing.
Can you not follow a conversation? I was talking about the two incidents mentioned in Australia. You are like a sad puppy crying for attention
So you think it is just a coincidence that there has been a mass killing due to guns in Australia since they banned them in 1996? Wow They really got lucky with the timing what a coincidence
The only sad thing on these forums is that your mother didn't have the abortion you so eagerly endorse.
Chris0nllyn
Well-Known Member
Which is why I said, "depends".
The FBI, Congress, media, and gun control advocates such as the Brady Center and Mass Shooting Tracker all have different definitions. Even Australis has a different definition.
So you are saying that mass killings are only bad if firearms were used. Gotcha.
black dog
Free America
Sanger and Kellogg were right.....
Look at you, commenting before you read the linked story. :cheekpinch: