J
JPC, Sr.
Guest




JPC said:If two crack parents leave their baby on a Catholic church (or any sanctuary) steps where they are certain the place there will take full care of the child, THEN those parents have provided for their child.
It would be illogical and ethically baseless for the government to then hunt down those parents to force them to pay child support, BUT the State of Maryland is that blind and ruthless right now and it needs to be reformed.
----------------
![]()
Two words only need to be taken out of here. Dump and support. If I'm dumping something (no pun intended) am I really supporting it anymore?JPC said:If two crack parents leave their baby on a Catholic church (or any sanctuary) steps where they are certain the place there will take full care of the child, THEN those parents have provided for their child.
It would be illogical and ethically baseless for the government to then hunt down those parents to force them to pay child support, BUT the State of Maryland is that blind and ruthless right now and it needs to be reformed.
----------------
![]()
Just when you thought you'd heard every crackpot loony idea in the world....JPC said:If two crack parents leave their baby on a Catholic church (or any sanctuary) steps where they are certain the place there will take full care of the child, THEN those parents have provided for their child.
It would be illogical and ethically baseless for the government to then hunt down those parents to force them to pay child support, BUT the State of Maryland is that blind and ruthless right now and it needs to be reformed.
What's scary is that people like this get to vote! Some even run successfully for office!vraiblonde said:Just when you thought you'd heard every crackpot loony idea in the world....
JPC said:If two crack parents leave their baby on a Catholic church (or any sanctuary) steps where they are certain the place there will take full care of the child, THEN those parents have provided for their child.
It would be illogical and ethically baseless for the government to then hunt down those parents to force them to pay child support, BUT the State of Maryland is that blind and ruthless right now and it needs to be reformed.
----------------
![]()
JPC said:If two crack parents leave their baby on a Catholic church (or any sanctuary) steps where they are certain the place there will take full care of the child, THEN those parents have provided for their child.
It would be illogical and ethically baseless for the government to then hunt down those parents to force them to pay child support, BUT the State of Maryland is that blind and ruthless right now and it needs to be reformed.
----------------
![]()
Slik said:Does the state (or should I say the taxpayers), that is now paying for the everyday expenses of the crack parents "mistake" - have any recourse when those same parents dump #2 and baby #3 or baby #4 off ? Or do I have a right as a taxpayer - since my hard earned money will be used to feed, cloth and educate the crack parents "mistakes", to medically sterilize the crack parents ?
Slik said:What happens if/when the crack parents return to their senses, seek rehab and want custody of the children they dumped on the church steps. Should the other parents/taxpayers just be grateful and hand over the children they've raised. Their hearts should be torn out because some fool just realized they made a mistake by becoming crack parents ?
Slik said:Are you on crack ?
Right...JPC said:No, I am not on crack and I have never used crack.![]()
Llwynog said:Maryland’s safe haven law allows the parent/parents to remain anonymous. Therefore the state is not tracking them down for anything.
OMMFG are you serious?? I swear you never cease to amaze me.....illogical?? ethically baseless??? THOSE parents brought that kid into the world, it is THEIR responsibility to take care of it....end of conversation....if they feel the child would be better off with someone else, then by all means give it to someone else, but it is still THEIR responsibility to take care of it. That is like saying that just because a mother gets custody of her child and the deadbeat father doesn't pay child support he shouldn't be forced to because he "allowed" the child to stay with his/her mother where the deadbeat knew the baby would be better off.....:cockoo: :cockoo:JPC said:If two crack parents leave their baby on a Catholic church (or any sanctuary) steps where they are certain the place there will take full care of the child, THEN those parents have provided for their child.
It would be illogical and ethically baseless for the government to then hunt down those parents to force them to pay child support, BUT the State of Maryland is that blind and ruthless right now and it needs to be reformed.
----------------
![]()
Maryland was the 38th state to enact a safe haven law in May of 2002.JPC said:I have heard that many States now have "Safe haven" laws but Maryland is not one of them.
If he actually were to put down his crack pipe and read some of the books in the library that he is permeating with his vile existence, he might be able to learn some of these facts.Llwynog said:Maryland was the 38th state to enact a safe haven law in May of 2002.
And this guy wants to be elected to the state legislature!!!Llwynog said:Maryland was the 38th state to enact a safe haven law in May of 2002.
that would actually be of no threat if you think about it.vraiblonde said:And this guy wants to be elected to the state legislature!!!![]()
vraiblonde said:
Tina2001aniT said:That is like saying that just because a mother gets custody of her child and the deadbeat father doesn't pay child support he shouldn't be forced to because he "allowed" the child to stay with his/her mother where the deadbeat knew the baby would be better off.....:cockoo: :cockoo: