Child Support as only a Political Policy.

J

JPC, Sr.

Guest
:eyebrow: If two crack parents leave their baby on a Catholic church (or any sanctuary) steps where they are certain the place there will take full care of the child, THEN those parents have provided for their child.

:yay: It would be illogical and ethically baseless for the government to then hunt down those parents to force them to pay child support, BUT the State of Maryland is that blind and ruthless right now and it needs to be reformed.

:wench: ---------------- :diva:
 

slik

New Member
JPC said:
:eyebrow: If two crack parents leave their baby on a Catholic church (or any sanctuary) steps where they are certain the place there will take full care of the child, THEN those parents have provided for their child.

:yay: It would be illogical and ethically baseless for the government to then hunt down those parents to force them to pay child support, BUT the State of Maryland is that blind and ruthless right now and it needs to be reformed.

:wench: ---------------- :diva:


Does the state (or should I say the taxpayers), that is now paying for the everyday expenses of the crack parents "mistake" - have any recourse when those same parents dump #2 and baby #3 or baby #4 off ? Or do I have a right as a taxpayer - since my hard earned money will be used to feed, cloth and educate the crack parents "mistakes", to medically sterilize the crack parents ?
What happens if/when the crack parents return to their senses, seek rehab and want custody of the children they dumped on the church steps. Should the other parents/taxpayers just be grateful and hand over the children they've raised. Their hearts should be torn out because some fool just realized they made a mistake by becoming crack parents ?
Are you on crack ?
 

BuddyLee

Football addict
JPC said:
:eyebrow: If two crack parents leave their baby on a Catholic church (or any sanctuary) steps where they are certain the place there will take full care of the child, THEN those parents have provided for their child.

:yay: It would be illogical and ethically baseless for the government to then hunt down those parents to force them to pay child support, BUT the State of Maryland is that blind and ruthless right now and it needs to be reformed.

:wench: ---------------- :diva:
Two words only need to be taken out of here. Dump and support. If I'm dumping something (no pun intended) am I really supporting it anymore?
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
JPC said:
If two crack parents leave their baby on a Catholic church (or any sanctuary) steps where they are certain the place there will take full care of the child, THEN those parents have provided for their child.

It would be illogical and ethically baseless for the government to then hunt down those parents to force them to pay child support, BUT the State of Maryland is that blind and ruthless right now and it needs to be reformed.
Just when you thought you'd heard every crackpot loony idea in the world....
 

Steve

Enjoying life!
vraiblonde said:
Just when you thought you'd heard every crackpot loony idea in the world....
What's scary is that people like this get to vote! Some even run successfully for office!
 
S

Schizo

Guest
JPC said:
:eyebrow: If two crack parents leave their baby on a Catholic church (or any sanctuary) steps where they are certain the place there will take full care of the child, THEN those parents have provided for their child.

:yay: It would be illogical and ethically baseless for the government to then hunt down those parents to force them to pay child support, BUT the State of Maryland is that blind and ruthless right now and it needs to be reformed.

:wench: ---------------- :diva:

:killingme

Hey look, he likes the :wench: ... :lmao:
 

Llwynog

Thats Welsh for fox.
JPC said:
:eyebrow: If two crack parents leave their baby on a Catholic church (or any sanctuary) steps where they are certain the place there will take full care of the child, THEN those parents have provided for their child.

:yay: It would be illogical and ethically baseless for the government to then hunt down those parents to force them to pay child support, BUT the State of Maryland is that blind and ruthless right now and it needs to be reformed.

:wench: ---------------- :diva:

Maryland’s safe haven law allows the parent/parents to remain anonymous. Therefore the state is not tracking them down for anything.
 
J

JPC, Sr.

Guest
The Truth Shall Set Us All Free.

Slik said:
Does the state (or should I say the taxpayers), that is now paying for the everyday expenses of the crack parents "mistake" - have any recourse when those same parents dump #2 and baby #3 or baby #4 off ? Or do I have a right as a taxpayer - since my hard earned money will be used to feed, cloth and educate the crack parents "mistakes", to medically sterilize the crack parents ?

:coffee: Well of course you do not have any right to comit a hatefull act like that. AND, them having a baby is not a mistake. It is a blessing.

Slik said:
What happens if/when the crack parents return to their senses, seek rehab and want custody of the children they dumped on the church steps. Should the other parents/taxpayers just be grateful and hand over the children they've raised. Their hearts should be torn out because some fool just realized they made a mistake by becoming crack parents ?

:yay: It would be a miracle and a happy event if the biological parents "return to their senses" and come back for their children. Amen.

Slik said:
Are you on crack ?

No, I am not on crack and I have never used crack. :eyebrow:
 
J

JPC, Sr.

Guest
The Truth Shall Set Us All Free.

Llwynog said:
Maryland’s safe haven law allows the parent/parents to remain anonymous. Therefore the state is not tracking them down for anything.

:coffee: I have heard that many States now have "Safe haven" laws but Maryland is not one of them.
 

bcp

In My Opinion
How can someone spend all day in a library and end up as totally ignorant and without a functioning brain as you seem to be? HOW??


you actually think that dumping your child is taking care of it? providing for it?

you are the biggest idiot that I have ever had the displeasure of reading. ever.

heres a clue for you beenie boy, keep your crank in your pants and you wont have to worry about another non wanted child. by the way, was your son born the product of you raping his mother? I just cant imagine any women dumb enough to open her legs for you willingly. except maybe your mother.

I swear to God, if you were my father I would have ended your miserable existence by now.

As would be my fortune, My father turned out to be a real man, not some little piece of crap on the public shoe as you are.

do everyone in the world a favor, try running your political race in Europe, right after you swim on over.

I would love to see all those children dumped by their parents walk into the library and confront you with your stupid and ignorant ideas..
 

Tina2001aniT

New Member
JPC said:
:eyebrow: If two crack parents leave their baby on a Catholic church (or any sanctuary) steps where they are certain the place there will take full care of the child, THEN those parents have provided for their child.

:yay: It would be illogical and ethically baseless for the government to then hunt down those parents to force them to pay child support, BUT the State of Maryland is that blind and ruthless right now and it needs to be reformed.

:wench: ---------------- :diva:
OMMFG are you serious?? I swear you never cease to amaze me.....illogical?? ethically baseless??? THOSE parents brought that kid into the world, it is THEIR responsibility to take care of it....end of conversation....if they feel the child would be better off with someone else, then by all means give it to someone else, but it is still THEIR responsibility to take care of it. That is like saying that just because a mother gets custody of her child and the deadbeat father doesn't pay child support he shouldn't be forced to because he "allowed" the child to stay with his/her mother where the deadbeat knew the baby would be better off.....:cockoo: :cockoo:
 

Llwynog

Thats Welsh for fox.
JPC said:
:coffee: I have heard that many States now have "Safe haven" laws but Maryland is not one of them.
Maryland was the 38th state to enact a safe haven law in May of 2002.
 

bcp

In My Opinion
Llwynog said:
Maryland was the 38th state to enact a safe haven law in May of 2002.
If he actually were to put down his crack pipe and read some of the books in the library that he is permeating with his vile existence, he might be able to learn some of these facts.

personally, I dont think that someone that admits to hating children as much as he does should be allowed in a library where contact with children is possible.
 

bcp

In My Opinion
vraiblonde said:
And this guy wants to be elected to the state legislature!!! :banghead:
that would actually be of no threat if you think about it.

the real politicians are just going to :smack:him and make him sit in a corner with his mouth shut.

I bet he even has to raise his hand to go potty.
 

Ken King

A little rusty but not crusty
PREMO Member
Maryland's Safe Haven law:

§ 5-641.

(a) (1) A person who leaves an unharmed newborn with a responsible adult within 3 days after the birth of the newborn, as determined within a reasonable degree of medical certainty, and does not express an intent to return for the newborn shall be immune from civil liability or criminal prosecution for the act.

(2) If the person leaving a newborn under this subsection is not the mother of the newborn, the person shall have the approval of the mother to do so.

(b) (1) A person with whom a newborn is left under the circumstances described in subsection (a) of this section as soon as reasonably possible shall take the newborn to a hospital or other facility designated by the Secretary of Human Resources by regulation.

(2) A hospital or other designated facility that accepts a newborn under this subsection shall notify the local department of social services within 24 hours after accepting the newborn.

(c) A responsible adult and a hospital or other designated facility that accepts a newborn under this section and an employee or agent of the hospital or facility shall be immune from civil liability or criminal prosecution for good faith actions taken related to the acceptance of or medical treatment or care of the newborn unless injury to the newborn was caused by gross negligence or willful or wanton misconduct.

(d) The Secretary of Human Resources shall adopt regulations to implement the provisions of this section.



Leaving a child on the steps is not leaving them with a responsible person and I would hope the state would prosecute the Hell out of them for abandoning the child.
 

Pushrod

Patriot
Tina2001aniT said:
That is like saying that just because a mother gets custody of her child and the deadbeat father doesn't pay child support he shouldn't be forced to because he "allowed" the child to stay with his/her mother where the deadbeat knew the baby would be better off.....:cockoo: :cockoo:

I think that is what this idiot is proposing. He got stung at some point for abandoning his kid and the mother and was ordered by a court to pay 'support' and didn't like it.

He should have thought about that before he decided to play 'hide the salami'!
 
Top