Child Support as only a Political Policy.

donbarzini

Well-Known Member
Let's see....we have a kick in the butt smiley, a smack in the head smiley, and a punch in the mouth smiley. What we need now is a "I want to choke the sh!t out of your dumb a$$ smiley and dedicate it to morons like JPC.


Please!?!
 

Toxick

Splat
Ken King said:
A person who leaves an unharmed newborn with a responsible adult within 3 days after the birth of the newborn, as determined within a reasonable degree of medical certainty, and does not express an intent to return for the newborn shall be immune from civil liability or criminal prosecution for the act.

Well, I suppose was written to eliminate the throwing of babies into dumpsters and leaving them for dead.

Of course, someone who does this is still a POS, and anyone who endorses this behavior is equally so.


Ken King said:
Leaving a child on the steps is not leaving them with a responsible person and I would hope the state would prosecute the Hell out of them for abandoning the child.

I suppose that it's marginally better than wrapping the baby up in a plastic bag and throwing it in a dumpster.



I waited my whole life to have children, and I couldn't wait to be a dad. I just cannot begin to try and fathom the mindset of these people that would abandon their baby like that.

Even a dead-beat parent is better than that.






Of course, that's like saying a shitstain is better than an actual turd.
 
J

JPC, Sr.

Guest
The Truth Shall Set Us All Free.

JPC said:
:eyebrow: If two crack parents leave their baby on a Catholic church (or any sanctuary) steps where they are certain the place there will take full care of the child, THEN those parents have provided for their child.

:yay: It would be illogical and ethically baseless for the government to then hunt down those parents to force them to pay child support, BUT the State of Maryland is that blind and ruthless right now and it needs to be reformed.

:wench: ---------------- :diva:

:coffee: The point of the original post is that parents can provide for their children in other ways and in better ways instead of the government way of hunting the parents down and forcing the parents to fork over cash as child support.

Parents can give up their children for adoption, some Countries have orphanages, Grandparents can take full care of their grandchildren and there is nothing wrong with it when they do. Children are a blessing and it is wrong to act like they are only a burden and a liability. When one parent gets custody of their child then that parent gets blessed. When both parents raise their own children then everybody gets blessed.

:coffee: ----------------- :flowers:
 

mv_princess

mv = margaritaville
JPC said:
:coffee: The point of the original post is that parents can provide for their children in other ways and in better ways instead of the government way of hunting the parents down and forcing the parents to fork over cash as child support.

Parents can give up their children for adoption, some Countries have orphanages, Grandparents can take full care of their grandchildren and there is nothing wrong with it when they do. Children are a blessing and it is wrong to act like they are only a burden and a liability. When one parent gets custody of their child then that parent gets blessed. When both parents raise their own children then everybody gets blessed.

:coffee: ----------------- :flowers:

Why would you put that.............when you YOURSELF look at your child as a burden..........because you DIDN'T PAY YOUR CHILD SUPPORT!
 

RoseRed

American Beauty
PREMO Member
JPC said:
:coffee: The point of the original post is that parents can provide for their children in other ways and in better ways instead of the government way of hunting the parents down and forcing the parents to fork over cash as child support.

Parents can give up their children for adoption, some Countries have orphanages, Grandparents can take full care of their grandchildren and there is nothing wrong with it when they do. Children are a blessing and it is wrong to act like they are only a burden and a liability. When one parent gets custody of their child then that parent gets blessed. When both parents raise their own children then everybody gets blessed.

:coffee: ----------------- :flowers:

Would you take in your grandchild on your own dime?
 

MMDad

Lem Putt
RoseRed said:
Would you take in your grandchild on your own dime?

Of course he wouldn't. He wouldn't even take care of his own demon spawn. Remember, he's the poor victim here who needs handouts from the very people he is trying to put out of work.
 

bcp

In My Opinion
JPC said:
:coffee: Children are a blessing and it is wrong to act like they are only a burden and a liability.
And yet, you spent your whole life trying to avoid providing for your child...

sounds like you look at the child as a burden and a liability.

I hope your kid gets to pick your nursing dumpster,, um, I mean home.
 

RoseRed

American Beauty
PREMO Member
MMDad said:
Of course he wouldn't. He wouldn't even take care of his own demon spawn. Remember, he's the poor victim here who needs handouts from the very people he is trying to put out of work.

I know that, I just wanted to see what he would say. :lmao:
 
J

JPC, Sr.

Guest
The Truth Shall Set Us All Free.

mv_princess said:
Why would you put that.............when you YOURSELF look at your child as a burden..........because you DIDN'T PAY YOUR CHILD SUPPORT!

:popcorn: Because I do not consider my child or any child as a burden.

Try believing what is said and not make conclutions.

People that do not pay the Court order does not have any true meaning as to how they feel about their children. That is a deception.

I do write and tell my opinions and beliefs so there is no need to make up other conclutions nor to believe slander from others. The truth sets free.

:popcorn: -------------- :coffee:
 

mv_princess

mv = margaritaville
JPC said:
:popcorn: Because I do not consider my child or any child as a burden.

Try believing what is said and not make conclutions.

People that do not pay the Court order does not have any true meaning as to how they feel about their children. That is a deception.

I do write and tell my opinions and beliefs so there is no need to make up other conclutions nor to believe slander from others. The truth sets free.

:popcorn: -------------- :coffee:
You have no truths..............You have stories. That you HOPE the rest of us (*your voters*) will believe. Your a deadbeat no good S.O.B.

You do think of him as a burden, only caring that your "hurt" and you need "help" Yes you do need help...........and if you would like I can offer to help you by giving this very nice white jacket I picked up for you...what size should i tailor it too?
 
J

JPC, Sr.

Guest
The Truth Will Set Us All Free.

Llwynog said:
Maryland’s safe haven law allows the parent/parents to remain anonymous. Therefore the state is not tracking them down for anything.

:diva: My appologies, as I said that Maryland does not have a safe haven law and surely it does. Below is the best link I could quickly find,


University of Maryland Medical Center becomes a Safe Haven, 2003.

Unfortunately it still does not apply to the original post here. The Maryland Safe Haven Law gives a parent only 72 hours to drop off the new born and not face prosecution. Every one else is hunted down as I said in the first.

:popcorn: ------------------- :flowers:
 

bcp

In My Opinion
Since JPC has a habit of not answering honest questions, yet gets upset when he is credited with no or little respect, I will post these questions here also, since this is the last place he was seen.

Quote:
<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="100%"> <tbody><tr> <td class="alt2" style="border: 1px inset ;"> Originally Posted by JPC, Sr.
:bigwhoop:
The Editorial section of the Enterprise is a great place to write people's opinions. The Editor does not print any childish name calling trash though, FYI. Also that is putting one's name out into the public areana and so think about it before doing it.

</td> </tr> </tbody></table>
Even without the terms of passion that you choose to refer to as (childish name calling trash) do you think that any person in their sane mind is going to see things the way you do?
I will say this for you though, If you take your misguided thoughts to some of the lower income Baltimore city areas, you might be able to get enough support to actually win a position of some sort there.
I really doubt that you will recieve any more votes than you have friends voting for you.

Quote:
<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="100%"> <tbody><tr> <td class="alt2" style="border: 1px inset ;"> Originally Posted by JPC, Sr.
I have written a number of Editorials over the years and I am a candidate for public office because I am confident that I can stand the public response to my campaign and to my platform.

</td> </tr> </tbody></table>

I have written a few Editorials myself over the years, I hold a higher degree from ODU, Have worked in upper management and currently own my own business,,, yet, I dont think that I am a good choice for a public office because I know I would try to push certain policies that I would like to see, verses what would actaully be good for the general public.

The difference between My wanting to run and Your actually running is no more complicated that my ability to admit that I am not what is needed in any public office.

What is it about you that makes things different? Why are you a good choice?
This is the question that you constantly fail to answer, and until you get serious and tell people what is really on your mind, and what is really your driving force, dont expect to recieve too much in the way of respect.

I just can put it any more simply.

So, you dont like the name calling, fine.
In this post I have given you exactly what you asked for.
I gave you my input, and my thoughts, and if taken as such, suggestions that might help you gain some respect.

What is your response to this?
Can we as a group be privilaged to the reason that you are a valid choice when it comes to the vote?

Oh, and guess what.
see, I do happen to live in Davidsonville, however, I do own property for investment purposes in the very district that you are running in,, and, If I choose to do so, I can vote in your district.
 

Toxick

Splat
JPC said:
Try believing what is said and not make conclutions.

:elaine: Actions speak louder than words. Court order or not, if someone doesn't pay MONEY to support their children, that makes them a deadbeat by definition. This is not slander. This is not unfair. This is a cold hard fact of life.

Unfairness would be what the children of deadbeat parents experience.


:howdy: -------------- :eyebrow:
 

Ken King

A little rusty but not crusty
PREMO Member
JPC said:
:diva: My appologies, as I said that Maryland does not have a safe haven law and surely it does. Below is the best link I could quickly find,


University of Maryland Medical Center becomes a Safe Haven, 2003.

Unfortunately it still does not apply to the original post here. The Maryland Safe Haven Law gives a parent only 72 hours to drop off the new born and not face prosecution. Every one else is hunted down as I said in the first.

:popcorn: ------------------- :flowers:
:killingme :lmao: You want to be a member of the state legislature but you can't find the laws already on the books. :roflmao:
 

MMDad

Lem Putt
JPC said:
:bigwhoop: I did already answer his post here,

BCP post answer from other thread.

:flowers: ------------------ :howdy:

Liar. You did not answer anything, just as you always do. You claim to have answers, refer people to the miserable drivel on your web page, then claim to have answered the questions. Your condescending responses show us that you are a true Democrat. One of the Oligarchy who is unwilling to listen to his potential constituency. You hold yourself above those you emulate.

Heinlein said that the things we hate the most in others are the things we hate in ourselves. Maybe you hate the Oligarchy because you strive to be a part of it?
 

slik

New Member
JPC said:
:diva: My appologies, as I said that Maryland does not have a safe haven law and surely it does. Below is the best link I could quickly find,


University of Maryland Medical Center becomes a Safe Haven, 2003.

Unfortunately it still does not apply to the original post here. The Maryland Safe Haven Law gives a parent only 72 hours to drop off the new born and not face prosecution. Every one else is hunted down as I said in the first.

:popcorn: ------------------- :flowers:


72 hours ago you didn't even know this law existed !!!
Maybe we can convince Llwynog to run for office instead. My point being: if you are that hell bent on changing the laws of Child Support and changing the way the government views deadbeats, shouldn't you atleast be up to date on what the current laws are ?
 

bcp

In My Opinion
JPC said:
Unfortunately it still does not apply to the original post here. The Maryland Safe Haven Law gives a parent only 72 hours to drop off the new born and not face prosecution. Every one else is hunted down as I said in the first.
Oh goody,
Only gives someone 72 hours to dump the kid. Certainly not a long enough period to determine if you like the kid or not. Much greater time is needed to be fair.

Under JPCs control, can you just imagine all of the 12 and 13 year old boys that are dropped off as they reach that age of trouble?
 
Top