Child Support, II

Pete

Repete
2ndAmendment said:
I disagree. You are not stupid. :howdy:Your spelling stinks like mine does and you miss use "to" and "too" and "then" and "than", but lots of people do that especially on this board.

If you ran, I might vote for you, but you are not in my district.
Thank you. :notworthy Thats why I spell checked it :yay: Unfortunately some of my typos like "from" "form" "than" "then" are real words so it doesn't catch them. I think I have a tumor :boo:
 

harleygirl

Working for the weekend
Pete said:
OK, James I have read Thrower V BOSE and I have concluded that you misquote and misinterpret the intent of the Appellant court.

Post Script: You are seriously misguided. You disagree with social norms, disagree with common American values and when forced to comply you opt for jail. When released you twice threw a temper tantrum and defaced government (the peoples) property like a toddler who can't have ice cream.

Which of these qualities exactly is supposed to convince me a registered voter in this district that you represent my values? The failure to live up to societal norms and provide for your children? The temper tantrums which resulted in your jailing? The fact that when riled you destroy public property? The fact you are a socialist who is angry that YOUR money is being taken to support YOUR child yet you feel totally free to use MY money to do it?

Pete is the smartest man on the face of this planet!! :love: Pete for president!!
 

Midnightrider

Well-Known Member
Pete said:
OK, James I have read Thrower V BOSE and I have concluded that you misquote and misinterpret the intent of the Appellant court.
good work pete, i read it and came to the same conclusions, they got it over turned on technicalities, but the law was solid.
And surprise, surprise J-Pidiot missed the point of the decision. If you listened to him you would think that the court ruled child support is unlawful!
 
Top