Toxick said:
Typical.
The left is all about freedom of speech - so long as it's speech they agree with. They're all about tolerance, unless you dare oppose them. If you disagree with them, tolerance and freedom go out the effing window.
I'm pretty sure I've discussed this on here before....but the problem with the left is, they don't realize they're "left". They don't see themselves as the polar opposites of the "right" - they see themselves as the mainstream, even if polls don't agree. From their perspective, there's a large "middle" - where most people are - and there's those extremists on the right. There IS NO left. There's just "us" and the "extremists". And they're against "extremism" to the point where they don't believe extremists have an equal place at the table of public debate.
Kind of like having an open SOMD forum, so long as you don't get abusive, or try to advertise - then, freedom of speech is curtailed. They see themselves in the same situation - espousing the views of normal Americans, they have no problem stifling the views of "nutjobs" - conservatives. They don't have a problem with "liberal bias" on TV because to them, it's normal. They DON'T like Fox, because to them, it's like giving Nazis and skinheads their own network.
When elections don't go their way, they're incredulous. They're so convinced they match what the American voter thinks and feels, they're utterly convinced that the elections MUST have been stolen - because you can't lose an election where most of the voters are on your side already.
And they have something else which MOST conservatives don't possess - but some do. A moral attachment to issues. There is the wrong way, and there's my way. There are NOT three or four sides to an issue - there's the right way and everything is wrong - and therefore should never be entertained. (Admittedly, the religious right is often this way; but they don't comprise the majority of conservative thought). I heard a radio ad describing new legislation regarding credit unions. All I ever heard was that it WAS *WRONG*. No discussion. Just WRONG. Not "unwise, shortsighted, or impractical". Wrong. It's as though someone asked you, should you let your kids stay up past their beditme - or slaughter them with a butcher knife? Well, ONE is obviously wrong. And that's the point from which they argue.
I like, and generally prefer conservatives, partly because most of the ones I know don't have this - failing. They're pragmatists, not ideologues. It doesn't matter whether it's philosophically correct or not - it will, or won't work. Their attachment to issues doesn't have one right way - they'll entertain both sides IF one side can substantiate its validity.