Colarado joins the gay agenda today

[tommyjones]

Just a reporter of news...If your so upset about it maybe U have the problem...it's Ok I wont think any less of you.

i'd rather you dont think about me any more either.......


:youarealmostoutofthecloset:

 

[AndyMarquisLIVE]

Just a reporter of news...If your so upset about it maybe U have the problem...it's Ok I wont think any less of you.

You just post whatever fits into your neocon agenda.

 

[LordStanley]

You just post whatever fits into your neocon agenda.

<---- my toppick post

 

[AndyMarquisLIVE]

<---- my toppick post

Whatever happened to toppick? He get banned? He's been uncharacteristically quiet lately.

 

[LordStanley]

Whatever happened to toppick? He get banned? He's been uncharacteristically quiet lately.

I know right!!!

 

[CalifrniaDreamn]

Just a reporter of news...If your so upset about it maybe U have the problem...it's Ok I wont think any less of you.

That's right -- he just reports it... he's not obsessed.... really.... he doesn't seek out news about gays.... he just reports it.... makes you wonder how he comes across all this gay news if he doesn't seek it out.... maybe he's got an inside source....

 

[toppick08]

Whatever happened to toppick? He get banned? He's been uncharacteristically quiet lately.

 

[This_person]

You just post whatever fits into your neocon agenda.

A little girl was playing in the garden when she spied two spiders mating.

"Daddy, what are those two spiders doing?" she asked.

"They're mating," her father replied.

"What do you call the spider on top, Daddy?" she asked.

"That's a daddy long legs," her father answered.

"So, the other one is a mommy long legs?" the little girl asked.

"No," her father replied. "Both of them are daddy long legs."

The little girl thought for a moment, then took her foot and stomped them flat.

"Well, we're not having any of THAT Brokeback stuff in our garden."

 

[Xaquin44]

look, I haven't read through all 9 pages, but did anyone else notice that the part of the law they paraphrased in their article omitted 90% of the peoples mentioned?

"disability, race, creed, color, RELIGION, SEX,
SEXUAL ORIENTATION, marital status, familial status, national origin, or
ancestry."

they made this some kind of homosexual crusade against the church when they were only a small mention in the bill.

also, this is pretty much already a law, but the bill calls for stricter forms of punishment.

The bill itself seems kind of redundant, but nowhere does it single out homosexuals as the sole benefactor of the bills warrents.

In other words, foodcritic, as usual, is making a mountain out of a molehill.

 

[Geek]

Just a reporter of news...If your so upset about it maybe U have the problem...it's Ok I wont think any less of you.

No dude. You are just a poster on a forum.