Considered dangerous weapons under Maryland law and illegal to carry openly or concealed.Originally posted by Nickel
Why not just get some ninja stars? :shrug:
I was being facetious.Originally posted by Ken King
Considered dangerous weapons under Maryland law and illegal to carry openly or concealed.
Duh. The 2nd Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution. It does not get any more political.Originally posted by Nickel
From my end, this isn't a political discussion.
The 2nd Amendment is not about hunting as so many liberals want to think. It IS about the people being able to control the central government by force if necessary. Just read the history behind the Bill of Rights and the debate that went into it. It is the RIGHT of the PEOPLE, not the National Guard or military, to keep and bear arms. And there is no limitation on what kind of arms an individual my own and carry, hence the "shall not be infringed". Any law that places a limit on the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms is an infringement. Too bad they don't teach English and history in the public schools anymore.Originally posted by Spoiled
I see no use in having hand held weapons, people dont really use them to hunt.... Riffles are good though, people use them to hunt and what not... If you want something for protection its not hard to put a shotgun uner or next to your bed...
They are illegal in Maryland too as are nunchaku unless you are carrying them to or from a dojo. I know, I am a Rokudan (6th degree black belt) and High Renshi (Master's Instructor).Originally posted by Nickel
Why not just get some ninja stars? :shrug:
Maybe you didn't understand...the conversation I was having with Dustin is not political...Sharon added a political spin to it...I informed her that politics have not bearing in what I was saying to him.Originally posted by 2ndAmendment
Duh. The 2nd Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution. It does not get any more political.
Again, you didn't understand...I was being facetious.Originally posted by 2ndAmendment
They are illegal in Maryland too as are nunchaku unless you are carrying them to or from a dojo. I know, I am a Rokudan (6th degree balck belt) and High Renshi (Master's Instructor).
This IS the Politics forum. Correct?Originally posted by Nickel
Maybe you didn't understand...the conversation I was having with Dustin is not political...Sharon added a political spin to it...I informed her that politics have not bearing in what I was saying to him.
Yes it is, but last time I checked, I was allowed to engage in conversation that has to do with the topic at hand, without a political spin. When my boyfriend shows interest in a concealed weapons permit, I have a right to converse with him about it, as it affects me and my child. All of that information isn't necessarily anyone else's business, but obviously I have to justify my non-political conversation.Originally posted by 2ndAmendment
This IS the Politics forum. Correct?
Thanks for the relationship advice. While he was discussing it in the open, I simply asked him, because I was curious, why he felt the need to carry a concealed weapon. I don't see why everyone needs to jump up and declare their 2nd ammendment rights when I was just asking a simple question, to which I got a simple response. I don't have a problem with someone commenting on something I've posted, however I do have a problem when people take what I say out of context to suit their own purposes.Originally posted by 2ndAmendment
If you want to have a conversation with your boy friend, then call him on the phone, talk to him over dinner, or use PMs. If you post it in public, expect to get comment.
Originally posted by Nickel
Thanks for the relationship advice. While he was discussing it in the open, I simply asked him, because I was curious, why he felt the need to carry a concealed weapon. I don't see why everyone needs to jump up and declare their 2nd ammendment rights when I was just asking a simple question, to which I got a simple response. I don't have a problem with someone commenting on something I've posted, however I do have a problem when people take what I say out of context to suit their own purposes.
Originally posted by Nickel
...the conversation I was having with Dustin is not political...Sharon added a political spin to it...I informed her that politics have not bearing in what I was saying to him.
I know you understood meOriginally posted by dustin
I understood your comments as just being curious as to what my personal motives were.
I just got a beef with the way the system is setup here.
But like you said I gotta pick and choose my battles
The advice was not about your relationship; it was about what to expect when you post in a public forum. And please show me where I took anything you said out of context.Originally posted by Nickel
Thanks for the relationship advice. While he was discussing it in the open, I simply asked him, because I was curious, why he felt the need to carry a concealed weapon. I don't see why everyone needs to jump up and declare their 2nd ammendment rights when I was just asking a simple question, to which I got a simple response. I don't have a problem with someone commenting on something I've posted, however I do have a problem when people take what I say out of context to suit their own purposes.
Paraphrased...Originally posted by 2ndAmendment
The advice was not about your relationship; it was about what to expect when you post in a public forum. And please show me where I took anything you said out of context.
Originally posted by Nickel
Paraphrased...
Dustin: I want to carry a concealed weapon.
Me: Why?
Sharon: Because it's his right according to the 2nd ammendment.
Me: I wasn't asking him from a political standpoint.
I was just asking, in a conversational manner, why he wanted a gun.
Yes I can, however when I clarified that I did not have intentions of starting a political conversation, I assumed I nipped it in the bud. The person at whom the question was directed understood that I was just asking for curiousity's sake, which is all that matters in the long run.Originally posted by 2ndAmendment
I can see your point of view. Can you see that this question was posted in the Politics forum and as such, would be take as a political challenge to dustin's right to have a concealed carry firearm if he wanted one?