Corruption of Medicine

seekeroftruth

Well-Known Member
OK... I've been asking about what the government is going to do about MEDICARE and MEDICAID and so far, no one from the government [or Congressman Andy Biggs] will respond to me.

I think doctors are billing for more surgeries than they should be allowed.

For instance, when the doctor told me he could do a little one-time surgery and get rid of the floaters he should have done the floater removal and that's it. Instead, he left me blind.

Well, according to the doctor... he "did nothing wrong" but I would need more surgery and more surgery and more surgery to "correct" what he "didn't do wrong".

This caused MEDICARE to be billed for three more surgeries. If I had MEDICAID it would have been the same... they would have been billed for three more surgeries.

He left me blind.

If he was REQUIRED TO CARRY LIABILITY INSURANCE, then the LIBILITY INSURANCE would be REQUIRED TO REPAY MEDICARE and MEDICAID for the THREE SURGERIES to "CORRECT" what he "DIDN'T DO WRONG".

Malpractice would also be required but that's for when they take out the wrong organ or chop off the wrong leg or doing surgery while they are sloppy drunk or when they kill a baby or when they kill the patient... that sort of thing.

Then... if the doctor's liability insurance had to pay out a lot of these "correction" surgeries, they would raise his rates and/or require him to get more schooling or quit.

He would have to stop blinding people.

US CITIZENS should not have to pay for surgeries that did not produce the results sold to the patient. US CITIZENS should not have to pay for "SERVICES NOT RENDERED".

And of course, Liability Insurance would have to repay my advantage insurance as well, which would lower my costs as well.

It's time we stopped worshipping doctors. They don't all know what they are doing!

:coffee:
 

Ken King

A little rusty but not crusty
PREMO Member
OK... I've been asking about what the government is going to do about MEDICARE and MEDICAID and so far, no one from the government [or Congressman Andy Biggs] will respond to me.

I think doctors are billing for more surgeries than they should be allowed.

For instance, when the doctor told me he could do a little one-time surgery and get rid of the floaters he should have done the floater removal and that's it. Instead, he left me blind.

Well, according to the doctor... he "did nothing wrong" but I would need more surgery and more surgery and more surgery to "correct" what he "didn't do wrong".

This caused MEDICARE to be billed for three more surgeries. If I had MEDICAID it would have been the same... they would have been billed for three more surgeries.

He left me blind.

If he was REQUIRED TO CARRY LIABILITY INSURANCE, then the LIBILITY INSURANCE would be REQUIRED TO REPAY MEDICARE and MEDICAID for the THREE SURGERIES to "CORRECT" what he "DIDN'T DO WRONG".

Malpractice would also be required but that's for when they take out the wrong organ or chop off the wrong leg or doing surgery while they are sloppy drunk or when they kill a baby or when they kill the patient... that sort of thing.

Then... if the doctor's liability insurance had to pay out a lot of these "correction" surgeries, they would raise his rates and/or require him to get more schooling or quit.

He would have to stop blinding people.

US CITIZENS should not have to pay for surgeries that did not produce the results sold to the patient. US CITIZENS should not have to pay for "SERVICES NOT RENDERED".

And of course, Liability Insurance would have to repay my advantage insurance as well, which would lower my costs as well.

It's time we stopped worshipping doctors. They don't all know what they are doing!

:coffee:
AGAIN - Obviously you don't know what liability/malpractice insurance is for. It is to cover claimed damages that they allegedly caused. Have you even bothered to contact a lawyer to bring a suit against that doctor?
 

seekeroftruth

Well-Known Member
AGAIN - Obviously you don't know what liability/malpractice insurance is for. It is to cover claimed damages that they allegedly caused. Have you even bothered to contact a lawyer to bring a suit against that doctor?
Of course I did... That doesn't stop the bad doctors from blinding others. It also doesn't stop the bad doctors from overbilling MEDICARE. We all pay into MEDICARE... Those doctors are taking money out of our pockets for failed surgeries.... consistently.

If the majority of doctors can accomplish a task in one surgery.... and one or two doctors consistently require 4 surgeries and a lawyer to fail, blinding a woman... then shouldn't the one or two doctors be required to do something. Liability would increase accountability. Also, Liability companies will notice the billing... and do something about it... MEDICARE should still pay for all surgeries, but the failures would be reimbursed.

By the way... my dad was Career Navy and he worked in Medical Research. I was taught to respect doctors. I do... for the most part. But since the blinding.... well white coat syndrome is a real thing... and some doctors should be fired or retrained. If their insurance premiums got too high, they should have to quit or learn.... "I didn't do anything wrong" doesn't work.... they billed for "corrective" surgery when they claim to have done a perfect surgery.... That just left me blind.

No doctor has all the answers... and when something consistently "just happens" then something is wrong with the procedure or the doctor needs more training.

Poop happens... but there should be some toilet paper to clean it up... right???

:coffee:
 

Ken King

A little rusty but not crusty
PREMO Member
If the majority of doctors can accomplish a task in one surgery.... and one or two doctors consistently require 4 surgeries and a lawyer to fail, blinding a woman... then shouldn't the one or two doctors be required to do something. Liability would increase accountability. Also, Liability companies will notice the billing... and do something about it... MEDICARE should still pay for all surgeries, but the failures would be reimbursed.
Liability insurance is for those that are sued for causing injury to another. It does not cover billing for services that were rendered. The mechanism for holding those persons accountable would be by the injured party bringing suit against them. If a carrier has an abundance of claims from one particular insured client all they would do is cancel their policy.
 

LightRoasted

If I may ...
For your consideration ...


Of course I did... That doesn't stop the bad doctors from blinding others. It also doesn't stop the bad doctors from overbilling MEDICARE. We all pay into MEDICARE... Those doctors are taking money out of our pockets for failed surgeries.... consistently.

If the majority of doctors can accomplish a task in one surgery.... and one or two doctors consistently require 4 surgeries and a lawyer to fail, blinding a woman... then shouldn't the one or two doctors be required to do something. Liability would increase accountability. Also, Liability companies will notice the billing... and do something about it... MEDICARE should still pay for all surgeries, but the failures would be reimbursed.

By the way... my dad was Career Navy and he worked in Medical Research. I was taught to respect doctors. I do... for the most part. But since the blinding.... well white coat syndrome is a real thing... and some doctors should be fired or retrained. If their insurance premiums got too high, they should have to quit or learn.... "I didn't do anything wrong" doesn't work.... they billed for "corrective" surgery when they claim to have done a perfect surgery.... That just left me blind.

No doctor has all the answers... and when something consistently "just happens" then something is wrong with the procedure or the doctor needs more training.

Poop happens... but there should be some toilet paper to clean it up... right???

:coffee:


How about taking care of yourself, rather than relying upon another? Most bodily ailments are reversible with a proper diet. Or do you just lack the discipline and self-sacrifice necessary to accomplish healing yourself. Seems you just like to bitch about things out of your control that you put yourself into. Putting yourself in such as position by not treating your body right, when you should feeding your body with healthy natural foods, in such a way as to not become ill. Patient heal thyself. Doctors only treat symptoms by masking the problem with pharmaceutical drugs, for which they are generously rewarded with monetary kickbacks, and never offer a cure.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
This story starts over a year ago, when the Biden-Harris DOJ began its weaponized prosecution of Dr. Eithan Haim, a whistleblower who exposed Texas Children's Hospital's 'gender-affirming care' program. We told you about the feds trying to ruin his life in January, but the story didn't end there.

In June, Dr. Haim was hit with felony charges for violating HIPAA , and the FBI released a statement on the case amid increasing blowback. That same month, we told you how the Biden-Harris DOJ was weaponizing the government against Haim and a second whistleblower. Dr. Haim's wife, Andrea, took to X to expose the DOJ's corruption after a judge tried to silence her husband, posting proof of the DOJ hiding evidence that would have exonerated him, and called out the FBI for wasting resources attacking her family while a terror attack happened in New Orleans.

Four days after President Donald Trump took office, the case against Dr. Haim was dropped.

He spoke to Catherine Herridge about the ordeal.

WATCH:




BREAKING: Doctor Targeted by Biden DOJ After Blowing The Whistle on ‘Gender-Affirming’ Care For Minors at Texas Children’s Hospital Breaks Silence After All Charges Dropped; Calls on Trump Administration/DOJ to Investigate His Case

“I was willing to go to jail”





 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member



Tick, tock. Late last week, the UK Daily Mail ran a remarkable headline offering a grim sort of hope for vaccine-injured folks. At least recognition.

image.png

Reading that dramatic headline —extreme body changes!— must make you feel like, now they tell us. As I’ve said before, when the covid jab house of cards finally falls —and it will— it will also crash the public’s last remaining trust in “science,” Big Pharma, and government. The fury will scour the institutions like a turbo Class 5 hurricane. It will be catastrophic, and they know it, which is why corporate media has been so reluctant to commit to this particular health story.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member



This is the scandal @billmaher was referencing. Our taxpayer $$$ were used to pay for this. Then the findings were suppressed by the doctors who performed the study because they didn't want people like Maher (or me, or more than half the American public) to "weaponize" results.


Image

Image

Image
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Could the covid dam be collapsing? A story in several headlines. First, Fox news, yesterday:

image 5.png

Kennedy’s HHS paused a $460 million dollar contract with a pharma company Vaxart, intended to develop a new oral covid vaccine. Kennedy stopped it for 90 days, to review the project and “decide on next steps.” It was a polite way of saying this thing stinks, and we’re not rushing forward.

Second, the Yale study I covered in yesterday’s C&C reached the New York Times yesterday. Late, perhaps, but still:

image 6.png

It’s their first real article on vaccine injuries since May of last year. “Some people with this syndrome,” the Times reports, “appear to show distinct biological changes—among them differences in immune cells, reawakening of a dormant virus called Epstein-Barr, and the persistence of a coronavirus protein in their blood.”

Third, the Atlantic ran the latest conspiracy-theory-confirming piece on Monday:

image 7.png

At the outset of the pandemic, scientists assured us that “the virus that caused COVID mutates rather slowly.” That claim was essential to the vaccine push. Now, The Atlantic casually admitted, “what actually happened was that SARS-CoV-2 began mutating quickly.”

The rest of the article was hogwash, describing in terrific detail an unconfirmed theory blaming immune-compromised people for “harboring” the virus where it mutates uncontrollably. Apparently, for an undisclosed reason, this potential scenario was simply impossible for scientists to predict.

Unstated in the article: this reflects very badly on the vaccines.

The Yale study showed that the vaccines create immune-compromised people. If The Atlantic’s theory is right, then the vaccines directly contributed to the rapid mutation problem. And if that weren’t enough, there’s a much darker possibility lurking: that covid was designed to evade vaccines by mutating quickly. Of course, common coronaviruses (like the cold) mutate rapidly too, so the scientific community’s early blunder was rather… perplexing.

I have no working hypothesis yet. But two positive developments stand out: first, the media deep freeze on negative vaccine stories may be over. It’s almost like nobody’s in control of the narrative anymore. Second, Kennedy’s HHS is getting after it.


 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Something has changed in the Daily Mail’s jab reporting. It ran two more vaccine injury stories in the last 24 hours. The first article is a story that we discussed in C&C two years ago (in 2023)— Megyn Kelly’s red-pill moment, after being diagnosed with an autoimmune disorder that her doctors said was from the shots. Here’s this morning’s Mail headline about old news:

image 2.png

Yesterday, the Mail ran an even more salacious headline, becoming, so far as I know, the first major media platform to blend vaccine injury into customary media health-risk scaremongering. Except instead of terrifying readers with the dangers of metal bra clasps, behold: your possible risk from vaccines:

image 3.png

That headline, and everything it implies, is the covid-industrial-complex’s worst nightmare. The last thing they want people wondering is whether their chronic health problems might have come from taking a vaccine for a mild cold virus. Worse, the article started suggesting symptoms that might be related to shot damage, including generalized things like brain fog and insomnia.

If folks start wondering whether their chronic health issues, even mild ones, came out of a jab, the next thing they will think about —as we have— is vaccine liability immunity. They’ll realize they have no recourse. Next after that is bottled-up fury. Pressurize anger.

It’s true that the Daily Mail is only perhaps one step above the British version of a tabloid. (e.g., “I Accidentally Had Sex With My In-vitro Brother Thanks to Crooked Fertility Doc.”) It’s also true the same intrepid health reporter penned both stories, Emily Stearns. She’s on a roll, isn’t she?

It seems to me the most significant implication arising from the bare fact the Daily Mail is regularly running stories that shade the vaccines — nothing bad is happening. The FBI isn’t raiding the editor’s house at 2am every other Thursday and euthanizing her pet chipmunk. The Mail hasn’t received a notice from the Bureau of the Exchequer advising of a pending review of their 1976 tax returns (please bring all receipts). Severed horse heads aren’t suddenly appearing under the reporter’s bed linens.

Is the Daily Mail the canary in the mRNA mine? With a flock of other canaries perched right outside, waiting to see whether Canary Numero Uno survives? What happens when other second-tier platforms, equally eager for clicks, see the Daily Mail getting away with it? There are tens of thousands of heart-wrenching vaccine injury stories waiting to be told. If not millions. And all of those stories include a disquieting common element: the government gaslit and abused us.

The needle of justice jabs slowly, but it eventually reaches the target. Or words to that effect. Something about ‘wheels.’



 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
That wasn’t all. Finally, on Tuesday, President Trump signed another executive order titled, “Making America Healthy Again by Empowering Patients with Clear, Accurate, and Actionable Healthcare Pricing Information.” In 2019, Trump ordered that hospitals publish prices for all medical treatments they offer. The new requirement was supposed to become effective in 2021, but (of course) the Biden Administration didn’t enforce it, with predictable results of widespread non-compliance.

image 9.png


In his new order, Trump reinforced the message. This time, I mean it. The order requires Departments of Treasury (the money machine), Labor, and HHS to “take all necessary and appropriate action to rapidly implement and enforce the healthcare price transparency regulations … within 90 days of the date of this order.”

This order clarified that hospitals must publish “the actual prices of items and services, not estimates,” deleting a loophole left open by the first order. The agencies are directed to ensure “pricing information is standardized and easily comparable across hospitals and health plans.” And they are to propose “regulatory actions” designed to ensure compliance with the order and “complete, accurate, and meaningful data.”

Hospitals, insurers, and pharmaceutical companies have spent decades perfecting a Byzantine system designed to prevent patients from finding out what anything actually costs—because if they knew, they’d shop around.

My libertarian streak feels uncomfortable with some of the implications. Under normal circumstances, any government intervention in pricing sounds nightmarish. What would Ayn Rand say? But hospitals and insurance companies aren’t free-market entities—they’re government-subsidized, government-protected monopolies.

More importantly, hospitals and insurance companies made their bed during covid. They refused to tell us how much covid treatment cost when that information was critically important. They built a bureaucratic system that locks out competition, exploits price secrecy, and relies on taxpayer money through Medicare and Medicaid. If they want to act like government entities, then they get to play by government rules.


Lie down with dogs, get up with orders forcing you to tell people how much your services actually cost.

The truth is that publishing transparent pricing is the last thing hospitals want to do. But, given the sorry state of American medicine, it is the best way to quickly drive down healthcare costs. Hospitals made their gurney, and now they have to lay in it. Just like the rest of us.



 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member




This man’s daughter was in an ambulance. After receiving a bill, they were resent a more expensive bill

He’s calling to find out why. “The first bill we got without the insurance was $600. And then the second bill was almost $1,300”

Their response, “You're not eligible for the discount since you are insured”

The billing department says, “The bill was $2,342.14. We billed your insurance. Your insurance only paid $1,078.85

Can I go back to the discount without the insurance?

No, so you're insured, so you're not eligible for the discount.”

So because he has insurance he has to pay almost $700 more, for a total of $1.300… Make it make sense

Healthcare in America needs SERIOUS REFORM
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
You didn’t think it would be that easy, did you? The Hill ran an enervating story yesterday headlined, “Kennedy sends mixed vaccine messages amid Texas measles outbreak.” The MAHA movement, enjoying a well-deserved run of astonishing good fortune, faced a setback this week, and that setback took the form of a pharma lobby, butt-kissing editorial that RFKjr published in, of all places, Fox News.

image.png

It didn’t start that way. The Hill explained that Kennedy “initially downplayed the outbreak in Texas during a Cabinet meeting with President Trump last week, saying it was ‘not unusual’ and falsely claimed that many people hospitalized were there ‘mainly for quarantine.’”

Not only that, but as the Hill correctly reported, “Kennedy has a long history of disparaging the MMR vaccine. He has … repeatedly linked it to rising autism rates and questioned its safety.” So far, so good.

But RFK’s Sunday op-ed sang a different, discordant tune. What a difference a week can make in 2025. Kennedy — or was it Kennedy? — disgracefully opined that, “Vaccines not only protect individual children from measles, but also contribute to community immunity, protecting those who are unable to be vaccinated due to medical reasons.”

Haha, “community immunity.” Good one. That, my friends, is the stale term “herd immunity,” but rewrapped in NewSpeak to conceal that they think we’re just a pack of dumb farm animals.

The sing-songy slogan “community immunity” was a dog whistle to mandatory jabbers everywhere.



All that said, I’ll scrape up my shattered optimism to defend Kennedy and offer a theory for the longtime vaccine critic’s warp-speed about-face. In my defense, nobody else has a better theory.

There were two subtle signals. First, and maybe most promising, the op-ed was not written in RFK’s voice. I, and many of you, have read Kennedy for years. The op-ed’s robotic, hyper-clinical language did not sound like him at all. I rather suspect that he got an odious assignment and subbed it out to a ghostwriter.

Second —maybe I am reading too much into this— his op-ed started with the sentence, “As the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, I am deeply concerned about the recent measles outbreak.” It sounded like a subtle sort of disclaimer. In other words, Kennedy wasn’t writing for himself. He was writing as HHS Secretary. It was his official duty.


 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
💉 “The CDC is actively supporting Texas state health officials and will be on the ground Tuesday working with the frontline health care providers,” said Kennedy’s principal deputy chief of staff Stefanie Spear. A Washington Post article reported that HHS is, in fact, sending 2,000 doses of measles vaccine to Texas — for anybody who wants them — along with shipments of Vitamin A.

In Gaines County, Texas, the center of the measles outbreak, WaPo reported “residents have embraced vitamin A and cod liver oil as crucial ways of getting through the surge.” Gaines County is home to a large Mennonite community— Christian anabaptists, of mostly German descent. They accept modern medicine but “prefer home remedies and traditional healing methods.”

In other words, the CDC is responding to the needs of the community rather than to the diktats of white-coated overlords.

The WaPo’s article was a circus of the usual suspects, like bowtied-wonder and vaccine developer Peter Hotez. They were all extremely concerned about the risks of Vitamin A. You can overdose on it! It can make you think you don’t need a vaccine! Of course, there wasn’t a single reference in any of the corporate media articles to any risks posed by the MMR vaccine.




 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member



Child that died in Texas apparently had pneumonia and RSV and word is they vaccinated while sick for measles, which isn't supposed to be done. Then child died and was called a measles death. Par for the course. Post vax will shed live measles virus from the shot and tests can easily misinterpret that as a wild type measles infection. Throughout the history of vaccine misinformation in this country one thing remains the same: relabeling other illnesses as the disease for which vaccine hysteria is being whipped up.




1741298128648.png
 
Top