The truth continues trickling out. On Wednesday, the UK Daily Mail ran a story headlined,
Trump admin given bombshell intelligence from ally that Covid was lab-made... and proof of new China program. Nothing about the facts should surprise you— but you may be surprised that this time, the story also appeared in the BBC, Reuters, and other corporate media outlets.
Reuters’ story was even topped by a
stock jab photo.
The German version of the CIA —der BND— gave a secret report to U.S. intelligence agencies in December. The report, concluding with 85% certainty that covid was made in the Wuhan lab, provided previously-unseen evidence in the form of unpublished research reports written by scientists working in the lab. But even that admission buried the lede.
A critical distinction the fake-news media has deliberately blurred for years is the key difference between a dangerous virus that
leaks from a lab, or a dangerous virus that was
made in the lab. The two concepts are related—but their implications are
vastly different.
Over the past two years, as the media has crept ever closer to just admitting Covid
leaked from Wuhan, they’ve carefully sidestepped the bigger question: was it a naturally occurring virus that spilled out due to sloppy lab safety? Or was it
deliberately engineered—a much more sinister possibility, one that raises disturbing but important questions about
motive.
Independent researchers have long pointed to viral features suggesting artificial origins—its furin cleavage site, embedded HIV segments, human-optimized receptor binding domain, and the conspicuous absence of gradual adaptation in humans. But this BND report marks the
first official acknowledgment—at a very high level of confidence—that SARS-CoV-2 was
an artificial virus.
The Daily Mail’s story also revealed the Germans had this intelligence
since 2020, raising more pressing questions: Why weren’t public officials more forthcoming when this information
mattered? Why did they hold back
better intelligence when it could have changed the course of events?
The story quoted Dr. Richard Ebright, a Rutgers University professor, who said, “The main points are clear: All informed persons - without exception - knew by early 2020 that SARS-CoV-2 likely entered humans through
a research-related incident in Wuhan.” It is no longer
just a lab leak. It has evolved into a “research-related incident.”
Ebright was blunt: “the scientific establishment and the intelligence agencies of the US and Germany withheld information from the public and policy makers.” Not unsurprisingly, the BND report also alleged that the Chinese are
continuing the research. Were covid’s lab origins withheld so that the research could continue uninterrupted? Did some agency worry that, if the public and officials found out, the plug would be pulled?
But the plug
must be pulled. And fast. But were there even darker motivations behind what has undeniably become the greatest cover-up in human history?
Each new revelation, exposed unwillingly in drops and squirts, adds to the mounting stack of damning evidence. As the government censorship complex encounters its rapid unscheduled dissassembly, more and better information continues to emerge. At what late date will it finally be
enough?
Soon, we hope. “
So have no fear of them, for nothing is covered that will not be revealed, or hidden that will not be known.” Matthew 10:26.
Progress.
Ukraine talks inch forward as Putin and Trump negotiate and clueless media spirals into outrage; Trump stirs chaos with Canada/Greenland musings—NATO nods along; German lab-leak bombshell drops; more.
www.coffeeandcovid.com
Even worse, the results showed that the IgG4 increase lasted for years after repeated mRNA doses. The elevated IgG4 (and IgG2) levels stabilized above normal baseline levels and stayed that way for the rest of the study period— nearly three years. The researchers saw no sign of those levels returning to pre-booster norms.
