Culture War - Woke / DIE / CRT / ESG

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
I do not believe that anyone who went to diversity class had any of their thoughts changed.
Those who agreed with the instructor agreed with him/her before they went there and those who disagreed went away still disagreeing.

Diversity training is a complete and total waste of time & money.
 

Clem72

Well-Known Member
Agree. The only thing the training does is tells you what not to do openly so you don't get fired.
There's value in that, right? If there's a code of conduct that is not based in common sense, then you need someone to tell you how not to fall afoul of it.
 

Hessian

Well-Known Member

What Is Woke Culture?​





A clear relationship developed between Cultural Marxism, and the Woke agenda.
It was NEVER about improving tolerance, and blending all people together...it was about overthrowing the fundamental values that have established the greatest civilization the world has ever seen and replacing it with the oppression of communism.
 

glhs837

Power with Control
I do not believe that anyone who went to diversity class had any of their thoughts changed.
Those who agreed with the instructor agreed with him/her before they went there and those who disagreed went away still disagreeing.

Diversity training is a complete and total waste of time & money.

Nope but it does tell them a slew of things they might not have considered as racist to complain about. Before training, asking someone "Are you taking Columbus Day off?" might just be blown off they view Columbus as the most evil man to walk the earth during his time period. After training, they can claim it as a microaggression.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
1733757157411.png

1733757174163.png
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Who cares about BLM?



This trial was brought to you by BLM, Obama’s rioters who pressure the judicial system to railroad white men. Judges in NYC may as well wave their BLM flags. The same kangaroos who worked for the Mafia before Giuliani now work for Soros.

AP said, “The case amplified many American fault lines, among them race, politics, crime, urban life, mental illness and homelessness. Neely was Black. Penny is white.”

No, it didn’t. Nor did the deaths of Michael D. Brown, Trayvon Martin or Saint George Floyd. This is political theater designed to divert attention from the nation’s post-Civil Rights achievements.

An out-of-touch media that promotes division in America promoted these cases at the behest of Democrats who seek to regain power through black pride and white guilt. It works. The hysterical white woman who prosecuted Neely’s trial made sure to call Penny a white man throughout the trial.


Bragg should never have charged Penny.

Pressure from BLM and the media also failed.

[clip]

BLM tried to use the case to regain relevance. Rats thrive on garbage. The jury put this trashy trial in the trash bin just as jurors did in the trials of George Zimmerman and Kyle Rittenhouse.

One of BLM’s many founders told the press after the acquittal, “We need some black vigilantes. People want to jump up and choke us and kill us for being loud? How about we do the same when they attempt to oppress us?”

NYT noted that the times have changed in New York. Violent crime and random attacks by teens, thugs and homeless maniacs have an impact.

Had Mr. Neely died during an encounter with a young white Marine several years earlier it would have been easy to imagine a broad movement forged in his name — a coalition of activists and bourgeois liberals like those who protested the murder of George Floyd. In the aftermath of his death, Black Lives Matter posters filled the windows of $10 million brownstones; mothers in expensive clogs convened at Barclays Center in Brooklyn with their billboards and children well-schooled in the history of oppression.
The Neely case has lacked the same fire; the mood seems to have shifted. Many of those same mothers who faced off against a brigade of cops in riot gear now worry about their children on the subways. Outside the courthouse at 100 Centre Street on Tuesday, the final day of closing arguments, the crowd of protesters was small.
 

CPUSA

Well-Known Member
There's value in that, right? If there's a code of conduct that is not based in common sense, then you need someone to tell you how not to fall afoul of it.
You sound like a DEI retard.
You're currently running afoul of common sense. It sounds like you need someone to point out your absurdity & stupidity.
You're welcome...
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

NAACP FUMES Over Walmart ABANDONING WOKENESS AS They REJECT OF DEI Programs After Election!​




 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member



Repeat observation, but there is something absurd about importing ‘high-skilled’ foreigners at the same time as the USA has been eliminating advanced programs in public schools that might identify domestic talent - all in the name of DEI.

We don’t even know how much domestic talent we have because we have worked to make it impossible to find it, and then to cultivate it.

Then we add insult to injury by saying we are desperate for foreign talent after hobbling our own kids at home. Our people - who may have been screwed - aren’t good enough.

[The US has domestic talent, business REFUSE to hire white men for diversity reasons ]
https://x.com/FischerKing64/status/1872073602444779993

1735237560724.png

1735237641663.png

1735237658289.png

1735237693250.png

1735237736849.png

1735237592281.png

1735237613627.png
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
🔥🔥🔥

USA Today ran a flippant story yesterday headlined, “McDonald’s flip in DEI beef serves up another win for conservative critics.” Yesterday the fast food giant quietly dropped a statement dipping its basket of corporate DEI programs into the deep fryer. Sanity is back on the menu.

image 8.png

Coincidentally on the same day yesterday, McDonalds also announced the return of its so-called ‘value meal’, which enthused a lot folks who aren’t that picky about their food quality. If the franchise would just return beef tallow to the fry stations and fix the ice cream machines, they might have something going. Anyway, under the new value meal plan, if you buy a breakfast or lunch item, you can get another one for only $1. Go crazy.

McDonald’s un-DEI statement credited the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision banning affirmative action in college admissions and the “evolving landscape around DEI.” (I’m not sure landscapes “evolve,” it seems like a mixed metaphor, but whatever. I’ll let it go.) But conservative anti-DEI activist and filmmaker Robby Starbuck promptly announced that he’d sent Mcdonald’s officials a private notice on Friday warning them that he was about to put the fast-food company in the DEI spotlight.

Here’s Robby’s version, in his own words:

image 9.png

CLIP: Robby Starbuck describes his successful anti-DEI campaign against McDonalds (4:22).

Whether Robby was responsible, or even whether he just prompted McDonalds to do what it already planned to do except sooner, either way he’s done it again. Mucho props to Mr. Starbuck. They should give him free value meals for life.

One caveat: McDonalds did not completely capitulate. The firm vowed to keep the “I” while flushing the “DE” into the grease trap behind the store. But out of the list of promised changes, the single most important modification was that McDonalds promised to delete its DEI rules for suppliers. This lets companies who don’t follow DEI compete for McDonalds’ business again. The ripple effects could be even bigger than McDonalds’ concession.

Progress! But just wait, there’s more.



 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Costco’s Oversized Faith In DEI




The pundit class described the board’s rejection of the proposal as a brave defense of DEI against right-wing bullies, one that was “notable in its forcefulness,” that set Costco “apart from other major companies,” and that “resets the conversation.”

What the board’s response really amounts to is this: Let’s keep our heads in the sand.

The statement starts by saying “The report requested by this proposal would not provide meaningful additional information to our shareholders.”

How would they know that without actually studying the risks and costs and letting shareholders decide for themselves if the information is meaningful?

What follows is just a recitation of the bromides that DEI advocates have been spitting out for years. Diversity is our strength. Our workers should reflect our customers. It’s good for the bottom line. Etc., etc.

Then the board launches into an ad hominem attack on the National Center for Public Policy Research, which filed the proposal. When it comes to diversity and inclusion, only certain viewpoints qualify.

The Costco board says that the only reason companies face risks from their DEI policies is because groups such as the NCPPR “are responsible for inflicting burdens on companies with their challenges to longstanding diversity programs.”

The board completely ignores the legitimate and widespread concern that DEI is, at its core, an effort to institutionalize discrimination, that it fosters conflict, and that it does a disservice to the notion that performance, not membership in some protected class, is what counts.

The board concludes by saying that the NCPPR’s “request for a study reflects a policy bias with which we disagree.”

In other words: We don’t like your politics, so you have no business asking us to do anything we don’t want to.


This is far from a compelling defense of DEI.

Meanwhile, the evidence piles up that DEI isn’t the winning business strategy its proponents claim. Pamela N. Danziger, writing in Forbes, points out that:

The business case supporting DEI programs and their ideological underpinnings is losing ground as more research emerges, like the study published by professors Jeremiah Green and John R.M. Hand in the Econ Journal Watch.
They tried to replicate numerous studies by McKinsey that served as a foundation for corporate DEI programs and found the McKinsey studies flawed.
‘[O]ur results indicate that despite the imprimatur often given to McKinsey’s 2015, 2018, 2020, and 2023 studies, McKinsey’s studies neither conceptually … nor empirically … support the argument that large US public firms can expect on average to deliver improved financial performance if they increase the racial/ethnic diversity of their executives,’ they wrote.”
 
Top