Dear Arizona:

vraiblonde

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Ha ha. Vote better next time, you tards.

www.foxnews.com

Arizona governor vetoes 'Alien Invasion Act' that would allow police to arrest illegal border crossers

Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs has vetoed a Republican-sponsored bill that would have authorized police to arrest migrants who enter the state illegally.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com

Democrat Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs has vetoed a Republican-sponsored bill that would have authorized police to arrest illegal immigrants, saying the legislation was anti-immigrant and likely unconstitutional.

The veto was criticized by Republicans who say the bill would have helped curb a plethora of crimes linked to illegal immigration in the Grand Canyon State.

The bill, called the Arizona Border Invasion Act, would have made it a misdemeanor crime for anyone to illegally cross the border at any location other than a lawful port of entry.

It would also have made it a felony for illegal migrants who cross the border after being deported, as well as those who have been ordered to leave the state but refused to comply. Local, county and state law enforcement officers would have been granted authority to arrest such individuals.
Click to expand...

Neither of those are unreasonable, and yet Katie Hobbs is trying to say it's unconstitutional..... :doh:
 
SamSpade

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Is “unconstitutional” the substitute for “racist” in government matters? How does arresting someone for breaking the law figure as unconstitutional?
 
Clem72

Clem72

Well-Known Member
HemiHauler said:
A concept so simple, you’d think the simpletons would be able to grasp.

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4

Further, Arizona tried this before and got smacked down.

So, yes, unconstitutional.
Click to expand...
That article is entirely restricted to naturalization. Illegal immigration is not naturalization, it's going outside the process of naturalization. Did you know that the constitution also says Congress has the power to levy taxes? Does that suddenly mean state/tribal/local taxes are unconstitutional? No.

We'll see how it plays out, but I doubt the supreme court will set a precedent that you can't enforce in-kind laws or amplify federal laws, otherwise we'll have a lot of issues with existing laws. Unless the feds say any and all border crossings are now explicitly legal, there's no conflict.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOP
H

HemiHauler

Well-Known Member
Clem72 said:
That article is entirely restricted to naturalization. Illegal immigration is not naturalization, it's going outside the process of naturalization. Did you know that the constitution also says Congress has the power to levy taxes? Does that suddenly mean state/tribal/local taxes are unconstitutional? No.

We'll see how it plays out, but I doubt the supreme court will set a precedent that you can't enforce in-kind laws or amplify federal laws, otherwise we'll have a lot of issues with existing laws. Unless the feds say any and all border crossings are now explicitly legal, there's no conflict.
Click to expand...

Well if you’d bother to read SCOTUS link I posted, you’d see where the Supreme Court held that “the removal process” has been “entrusted to the discretion of the Federal Government” because a “decision on removability” touches “on foreign relations and must be made with one voice.”

You neither have to like it nor agree with it.
 
BOP

BOP

Well-Known Member
vraiblonde said:
Ha ha. Vote better next time, you tards.

www.foxnews.com

Arizona governor vetoes 'Alien Invasion Act' that would allow police to arrest illegal border crossers

Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs has vetoed a Republican-sponsored bill that would have authorized police to arrest migrants who enter the state illegally.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com



Neither of those are unreasonable, and yet Katie Hobbs is trying to say it's unconstitutional..... :doh:
Click to expand...
I love how all these demonic rats think their job is to interpret the Constitution - a document they normally despise - and not the SCOTUS.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top