Sneakers
Just sneakin' around....
And a full body haptic suit.With VR headset and a deep fake?
And a full body haptic suit.With VR headset and a deep fake?
Do you prefer that over an analog?The civil court determined Trump digitally raped her as a matter of fact.
No proof that anything happened.With your fingers you moron.
Did you really not read or listen to any of the case yet have strong uninformed opinions on it?
SMC is still mad that Trump didn't grab his #####.Do you prefer that over an analog?
That's what I'm beginning to think. She probably rubbed one or two out just watching the proceedings.SMC is still mad that Trump didn't grab his #####.
No, it didn't. You are a retard, as a matter of fact. They found him civilly LIABLE. Use a dictionary if Google is too difficult for you. That's a legal term, it means "legally responsible", it does NOT speak to criminal liability or FACT.The civil court determined Trump digitally raped her as a matter of fact.
If they had anything at all on Trump other than innuendo, speculation, and conspiracy, they'd be trumpeting it from whatever the tallest building in New York City is loud enough that they could be heard in Mecca.Grab em by the Puss*-Donald Trump
Mr Trump said on the Howard Stern radio show in 2005 that he was “allowed”, as the owner of the pageant, to go backstage while the contestants were getting dressed.
“You know they’re standing there with no clothes. Is everybody OK? And you see these incredible looking women. And so I sort of get away with things like that.”
in a 2003 appearance on the Howard Stern Show, Trump said she's "got the best body," and in a 2006 interview on The View said she had "a very nice figure," adding: "I've said if Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her.
- A Trump biographer, Tim O'Brien, tweeted the quote from a 2002 profile of Epstein in New York magazine, in which Trump said: "I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side."
You should fire up the googler and ask it what "substantially true" means. Hint: not what you seem to think it means.He is also the second thing according to the legal system
"a judge in New York, Lewis A Kaplan, said that when Carroll repeated her allegation that Trump raped her, her words were “substantially true”. Kaplan also set out in detail why it may be said that Trump raped Carroll.
“It could not find that he ‘raped’ her if it determined that Mr Trump forcibly penetrated Ms Carroll’s private sexual parts with his fingers – which commonly is considered ‘rape’ in other contexts – because the New York penal law definition of rape is limited to penile penetration.”
Ms Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally – in other words, that Mr Trump in fact did ‘rape’ Ms Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood in contexts outside of the New York penal law.”
Judge says E Jean Carroll allegation Trump raped her is ‘substantially true’ in court dismissal
Ex-president claimed that writer defamed him when saying he raped her, but judge said term is commonly ‘used and understood’ in contextwww.theguardian.com
Me the moron…lmao. You’re the one who wrote it. How about trying to write it again when you start 4th grade.With your fingers you moron.
Did you really not read or listen to any of the case yet have strong uninformed opinions on it?
No, it didn't. You are a retard, as a matter of fact. They found him civilly LIABLE. Use a dictionary if Google is too difficult for you. That's a legal term, it means "legally responsible", it does NOT speak to criminal liability or FACT.
Here's an easy one for you. If your husband were prowling around my windows at night, as I hear he likes to do, and a dog bites his dick off, he could sue me and I would likely be found civilly liable. That does not make it a fact that I personally did it, it may not have even been my dog, and your husband didn't use it anyways.
Okay, you must be trolling. I don't know why I bother engaging when you just make shet up. He was not found GUILTY of anything, full stop. There was no criminal trial. There was no adjudication of "guilt". You can't just make things up and expect others to go along with your delusions.As usual your arguments and analogies are stupid.
Read the ruling in Trump's defamation case.
He can't claim defamation since he was found guilty of raping Carroll despite using his fingers instead of his penis.
And STILL Kamala's husband knocked up the nanny
yabbutyabbutyabbut doesn't change that FACT.
LMFAO!! You try so hard...and fail so badly..at all of your attempts to deflect or redirect after your failed lies are posted. You are a hoot to watch on here...Is Doug running for office?
And, as usual, you continue to peg the irony meter.As usual your arguments and analogies are stupid.