"Decency is back on the ballot"

Clem72

Well-Known Member
The civil court determined Trump digitally raped her as a matter of fact.
No, it didn't. You are a retard, as a matter of fact. They found him civilly LIABLE. Use a dictionary if Google is too difficult for you. That's a legal term, it means "legally responsible", it does NOT speak to criminal liability or FACT.

Here's an easy one for you. If your husband were prowling around my windows at night, as I hear he likes to do, and a dog bites his dick off, he could sue me and I would likely be found civilly liable. That does not make it a fact that I personally did it, it may not have even been my dog, and your husband didn't use it anyways.
 

BOP

Well-Known Member
Grab em by the Puss*-Donald Trump

Mr Trump said on the Howard Stern radio show in 2005 that he was “allowed”, as the owner of the pageant, to go backstage while the contestants were getting dressed.

You know they’re standing there with no clothes. Is everybody OK? And you see these incredible looking women. And so I sort of get away with things like that.”

  • A Trump biographer, Tim O'Brien, tweeted the quote from a 2002 profile of Epstein in New York magazine, in which Trump said: "I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side."
in a 2003 appearance on the Howard Stern Show, Trump said she's "got the best body," and in a 2006 interview on The View said she had "a very nice figure," adding: "I've said if Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her.
If they had anything at all on Trump other than innuendo, speculation, and conspiracy, they'd be trumpeting it from whatever the tallest building in New York City is loud enough that they could be heard in Mecca.
 

BOP

Well-Known Member
He is also the second thing according to the legal system

"a judge in New York, Lewis A Kaplan, said that when Carroll repeated her allegation that Trump raped her, her words were “substantially true”. Kaplan also set out in detail why it may be said that Trump raped Carroll.

“It could not find that he ‘raped’ her if it determined that Mr Trump forcibly penetrated Ms Carroll’s private sexual parts with his fingers – which commonly is considered ‘rape’ in other contexts – because the New York penal law definition of rape is limited to penile penetration.”

Ms Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally – in other words, that Mr Trump in fact did ‘rape’ Ms Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood in contexts outside of the New York penal law.”

You should fire up the googler and ask it what "substantially true" means. Hint: not what you seem to think it means.
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
No, it didn't. You are a retard, as a matter of fact. They found him civilly LIABLE. Use a dictionary if Google is too difficult for you. That's a legal term, it means "legally responsible", it does NOT speak to criminal liability or FACT.

Here's an easy one for you. If your husband were prowling around my windows at night, as I hear he likes to do, and a dog bites his dick off, he could sue me and I would likely be found civilly liable. That does not make it a fact that I personally did it, it may not have even been my dog, and your husband didn't use it anyways.


As usual your arguments and analogies are stupid.

Read the ruling in Trump's defamation case.

He can't claim defamation since he was found guilty of raping Carroll despite using his fingers instead of his penis.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
And STILL Kamala's husband knocked up the nanny :yahoo:

yabbutyabbutyabbut doesn't change that FACT.
 

Clem72

Well-Known Member
As usual your arguments and analogies are stupid.

Read the ruling in Trump's defamation case.

He can't claim defamation since he was found guilty of raping Carroll despite using his fingers instead of his penis.
Okay, you must be trolling. I don't know why I bother engaging when you just make shet up. He was not found GUILTY of anything, full stop. There was no criminal trial. There was no adjudication of "guilt". You can't just make things up and expect others to go along with your delusions.

If you want to "win" the discussion, please provide the actual legal case judgement that includes the word "guilty" with respect to rape or battery or any other term you want to use.
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
"Ms Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally – in other words, that Mr Trump in fact did ‘rape’ Ms Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood in contexts outside of the New York penal law"
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Kamala's husband banged the nanny! AND knocked her up!

:roflmao:

Maybe he was only a decent lay and that's what they mean by "decency on the ballot"? 🤔

At least it wasn't a gay bar hookup like Paul Pelosi's "intruder".

No wonder Dougie boy's ex is so bitter. Her husband dumps her for the nanny, then moves on to Heels Up Harris. That's gotta leave a mark.
 
Top