Deep State Corruption and Opposition
- Thread starter GURPS
- Start date
I LONG to see this prick's perp walk:
Just a reminder: this is Nikki Haley's good buddy.
Just a reminder: this is Nikki Haley's good buddy.
They all need to be tried and then strung up on the national mall in a televised execution.
If you want peace, prepare for war.
For centuries, those six words kept empires intact. They built walls in Rome, silenced tyrants in Berlin, and kept the peace during America’s rise as a superpower. Today, they’re more than just an ancient motto; they are policy, and President Donald J. Trump knows it.
As Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark) put it, that's the difference between the “America First” worldview and the “Blame America First” mindset that preceded it and nearly wrecked us.
Barack Obama’s deal with Iran let the mullahs keep their centrifuges spinning. The regime’s uranium program remained intact, their terror networks well-fed, and their confidence unshaken. Obama’s strategy was one of apologizing for our power and presence and hoping that humility would buy peace.
It didn’t.
It bought more rockets in Israel, more IEDs in Iraq, and ultimately, a Tehran that thought the White House could be rolled.
The Return of Strength
Now the world has changed. Trump is back.
And the ayatollahs know it.
They know this isn’t the era of John Kerry whispering in backrooms or Susan Rice writing red lines in chalk. This is the era of consequence, of clarity, of righteous fear.
Cotton made it plain, “The ayatollahs are scared to death of Donald Trump.” And he wasn’t exaggerating. Iran didn’t dare escalate when Trump was in office the first time. Their proxies stepped lightly. Their generals hid in shadows. And when they crossed the line, like Qasem Soleimani did, justice arrived from 30,000 feet.
You don’t need secret intelligence to know they’re rattled again. Just watch the way Tehran has stalled in negotiations. Or how their media began blustering louder the day after Trump’s inauguration. Dictators don’t threaten what they aren’t afraid of.
The Blame-America Crowd Never Left
But while the Oval Office has changed, the swamp has not. Obama may be gone, but his disciples remain embedded across the State Department, legacy media, and academic think tanks. These are the same voices who believe America is to blame for the world’s problems, because we’re too strong, too rich, too free.
They are the ones reviving the old rhetoric. If we just give Iran what it wants, maybe we’ll avoid war. They think strength is provocation and restraint is wisdom. They preach that bad deals are better than conflict, forgetting that dangerous deals become conflict once the ink dries and the missiles fly.
pjmedia.com
For centuries, those six words kept empires intact. They built walls in Rome, silenced tyrants in Berlin, and kept the peace during America’s rise as a superpower. Today, they’re more than just an ancient motto; they are policy, and President Donald J. Trump knows it.
As Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark) put it, that's the difference between the “America First” worldview and the “Blame America First” mindset that preceded it and nearly wrecked us.
Barack Obama’s deal with Iran let the mullahs keep their centrifuges spinning. The regime’s uranium program remained intact, their terror networks well-fed, and their confidence unshaken. Obama’s strategy was one of apologizing for our power and presence and hoping that humility would buy peace.
It didn’t.
It bought more rockets in Israel, more IEDs in Iraq, and ultimately, a Tehran that thought the White House could be rolled.
The Return of Strength
Now the world has changed. Trump is back.
And the ayatollahs know it.
They know this isn’t the era of John Kerry whispering in backrooms or Susan Rice writing red lines in chalk. This is the era of consequence, of clarity, of righteous fear.
Cotton made it plain, “The ayatollahs are scared to death of Donald Trump.” And he wasn’t exaggerating. Iran didn’t dare escalate when Trump was in office the first time. Their proxies stepped lightly. Their generals hid in shadows. And when they crossed the line, like Qasem Soleimani did, justice arrived from 30,000 feet.
You don’t need secret intelligence to know they’re rattled again. Just watch the way Tehran has stalled in negotiations. Or how their media began blustering louder the day after Trump’s inauguration. Dictators don’t threaten what they aren’t afraid of.
The Blame-America Crowd Never Left
But while the Oval Office has changed, the swamp has not. Obama may be gone, but his disciples remain embedded across the State Department, legacy media, and academic think tanks. These are the same voices who believe America is to blame for the world’s problems, because we’re too strong, too rich, too free.
They are the ones reviving the old rhetoric. If we just give Iran what it wants, maybe we’ll avoid war. They think strength is provocation and restraint is wisdom. They preach that bad deals are better than conflict, forgetting that dangerous deals become conflict once the ink dries and the missiles fly.
Si Vis Pacem: The Fear That Keeps Tyrants Awake
The Swamp’s Got Its Knives Out for Trump’s Peace Pick—Time to Rally Around Steve Witkoff
The Takedown Op is a manifestation of Donald Trump’s unconventional and experimental leadership style. The president likes to staff his campaigns, his administrations, and his roster of informal advisors with people who have wildly different policy views and goals. As long as these underlings are personally loyal to Trump and follow his decisions, they will be tolerated. But often, this leads to many internal campaigns to topple those favored by the president so a new man holding different priorities can be elevated in his place. And over and over, these internal campaigns are deliberately spilled out into the pages of America’s news outlets.
And so it is now with Donald Trump’s upstart chief diplomat, Steve Witkoff. Almost overnight and out of nowhere, Witkoff has become a star of the second Trump administration, the man who broke Foggy Bottom’s stranglehold on American diplomacy and showed that radical new approaches could be attempted and, more importantly, get results.
And so now, the attempt to unseat Witkoff is underway.
President Trump shouldn’t fall for it. Washington is attacking Witkoff because he brings a new style of diplomacy that old D.C. is simply not ready for—specifically, one that cares about speed, forthrightness, and results instead of appearances, deceit, and failure.
Witkoff, a real estate lawyer turned billionaire investor, has been friends with Donald Trump since the 1980s. Other than a minor advisory post during Covid, Witkoff sat out the first Trump administration, but he abruptly rose to prominence before the second even began when president-elect Trump named him his special envoy to the Middle East.
Witkoff brought no diplomatic experience at all—but he instead brought a lifetime of work in President Trump’s own favorite field of making business deals.
Even critics of the Trump Administration had to sit and marvel at the speed with which Witkoff brought about a ceasefire in the Israel/Gaza fight.
Haaretz:
Former Georgia Gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams is back in the news after it was revealed she was being investigated for government grant fraud. Oopsie-doodle! But she’s trying to flip the script by claiming she’s being targeted for proving that democracy can deliver. Huh?
The other day Senator Chuck Grassley released a file called 'Nellie Ohr FBI Analysis,' related to Fusion GPS, which in part accused of Ohr of misleading the public. For instance, this is one analysis of the document:
Now, to do a little bit of ‘lawsplaining’ to translate from legalese to English … Brady refers to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), which held that under the Due Process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, a criminal defendant has a right to any exculpatory evidence in the government’s possession. 'Exculpatory evidence' refers to any evidence that tends to show that a person is innocent of any crime the person is accused of committing or mitigating the severity of it.
To give a practical example, remember the Duke Lacrosse non-rape case? In that case, several members of the Duke Lacrosse team were accused of gang raping a woman at a particular time. Later on, it turned out that one of accused was on camera at an ATM at the time he was allegedly committing the crime, an
FBI confirms: Nellie Ohr lied to Congress
By Wendi Strauch MahoneyNewly declassified documents from a 2019 FBI analysis released on May 28, 2025 show that Nellie Ohr allegedly “knowingly“ provided false testimony under oath to Congress about her actions related to the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. Ohr was a Fusion GPS contractor who provided research and intel in the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, played a central role in pushing for declassification of the analysis.
An analysis of the documents concluded that Ohr’s statements obstructed congressional investigations and violated federal statutes 18 USC §1001 (false statements) and 18 USC §1505 (obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and congressional committees).
In April 2025, Grassley formally requested declassification of “the FBI’s analysis of a congressional criminal referral issued for Nellie Ohr following her false statements to Congress in 2018.” In a statement for the May 28 document release, Grassley lambasted the DOJ for its failure to prosecute Ohr, stating that the DOJ’s inaction undermined public trust in the rule of law. The DOJ failed to act on a 2019 congressional referral for perjury.
..ok Grassley, other than talk about it, what is your next action to hold Ohr to account?
One of Marxist revolutionaries’ most effective tactics wasn’t literally storming the palace— it was slyly capturing the certification process. Antonio Gramsci, the Italian communist theoretician, called it “the long march through the institutions,” meaning to infiltrate cultural organs not with guns, but with gatekeeping power.
The USSR mastered this model early, building parallel structures of party-approved unions, academic boards, and scientific councils—each vouching for the ideological purity of the others. In the West, the same approach evolved, virus-like, into a web of cross-reinforcing credentialing bodies: bar associations, accreditation boards, medical colleges, journal editorial committees—all marching in rhetorical lockstep.
They all work together. One group sets the guidelines, another “independently” evaluates compliance, and a third awards legitimacy. It’s Marxism in a business suit or a lab coat, spouting peer-reviewed footnotes. By the time anyone asks who made them the arbiters, they’ve already rewritten the standards and discredited anyone not compliant with the guidelines.
As Bondi’s letter made clear, conservatives, Congress, and even originalist judges have complained for years about the ABA’s ideological capture—but no one ever did anything about it. Until now. President Trump just ripped the beating heart out of the Marxist credentialing machine that has quietly policed judicial appointments for generations.
The impact could be enormous. Conservative judges aspiring to higher benches need no longer fear a secret ideological inquisition from the ABA— nor temper their rulings to avoid getting slapped with a scarlet “Not Qualified” label. For the first time in decades, judicial independence might actually include freedom from activist gatekeepers.
Once again, Trump didn’t debate. He didn’t take to the bully pulpit and beg for fairness. He didn’t encourage the ABA to reform from within, or run a strongly worded op-ed in the Wall Street Journal. He just cut them out of the process. Snip! This may be what “Trump Always Wins” really means— not that he never faces setbacks, but that he doesn’t ask permission, and never stops pushing until the mulish obstacle breaks, bends, or becomes irrelevant.
Whether it’s trade policy, DEI bureaucracies, or the judicial gatekeeping cartel, Trump keeps marching back through the institutions, while corporate media scribbles furious dissents. They expect a fight. But he isn’t fighting, he’s carving them up like the knight who said “Ni.” Less scalpel, more greatsword.
Chop, chop.
www.coffeeandcovid.com
The USSR mastered this model early, building parallel structures of party-approved unions, academic boards, and scientific councils—each vouching for the ideological purity of the others. In the West, the same approach evolved, virus-like, into a web of cross-reinforcing credentialing bodies: bar associations, accreditation boards, medical colleges, journal editorial committees—all marching in rhetorical lockstep.
They all work together. One group sets the guidelines, another “independently” evaluates compliance, and a third awards legitimacy. It’s Marxism in a business suit or a lab coat, spouting peer-reviewed footnotes. By the time anyone asks who made them the arbiters, they’ve already rewritten the standards and discredited anyone not compliant with the guidelines.
As Bondi’s letter made clear, conservatives, Congress, and even originalist judges have complained for years about the ABA’s ideological capture—but no one ever did anything about it. Until now. President Trump just ripped the beating heart out of the Marxist credentialing machine that has quietly policed judicial appointments for generations.
The impact could be enormous. Conservative judges aspiring to higher benches need no longer fear a secret ideological inquisition from the ABA— nor temper their rulings to avoid getting slapped with a scarlet “Not Qualified” label. For the first time in decades, judicial independence might actually include freedom from activist gatekeepers.
Once again, Trump didn’t debate. He didn’t take to the bully pulpit and beg for fairness. He didn’t encourage the ABA to reform from within, or run a strongly worded op-ed in the Wall Street Journal. He just cut them out of the process. Snip! This may be what “Trump Always Wins” really means— not that he never faces setbacks, but that he doesn’t ask permission, and never stops pushing until the mulish obstacle breaks, bends, or becomes irrelevant.
Whether it’s trade policy, DEI bureaucracies, or the judicial gatekeeping cartel, Trump keeps marching back through the institutions, while corporate media scribbles furious dissents. They expect a fight. But he isn’t fighting, he’s carving them up like the knight who said “Ni.” Less scalpel, more greatsword.
Chop, chop.
☕️ ALWAYS WINNING ☙ Friday, May 30, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
Just like that: tariffs back on; MIT deletes DEI; Bondi kneecaps ABA; RFK Jr. axes $600M mRNA deal; and the Times accidentally spotlights Trump 2.0’s master plan—history, reversed; and much more.
www.coffeeandcovid.com
typical disappointment with the GOP,
all talk NO ACTION .... just whine and complain at least Trump is a down and dirty fighter
All that can be done is a referral to DOJ for prosecution.
I caught a video 2 months ago at the start of the Tesla Protests ... this old couple had NO IDEA what the protest was about, the old man pulled out a flyer with the talking points and handed the paper to the interviewer .,..
here we were told to say this
...so the question is, did he? He never stated he referred it to DOJ, or maybe whoever put the story together failed to included it.
Sure, here's $100-200. go protest for a few hours tax free. Follow these people once they leave and see how many go out to dinner with the cash.
more than a few have been bussed in from nursing homes
Haven't seen anything saying he has, so maybe a better question is, will he and when?