Democratic Operatives
- Thread starter GURPS
- Start date
CENSURE? Rep Al Green was censured for disrupting Trump’s joint session of Congress, but after he raped Lucinda Daniels, his congressional aide, Congress paid her $875,000 from its $17M slush fund used to pay off the victims of members - no censure.
why is green even still in congress
Behold, the latest delightful headline from yesterday’s Wall Street Journal about the controlled demolition of the Democrat party. Is it too soon to call it an intra-party civil war?:
The Journal framed the dispute as the Democrats’ disagreement over whether and how forcefully to protest every single thing Trump does and says. On one hand, progressives — brilliantly illustrated by cane-shaking moron Rep. Al Green (now censured) — want to obstruct Trump’s official proceedings and chain themselves to the wheels of Washington.
www.coffeeandcovid.com
The Journal framed the dispute as the Democrats’ disagreement over whether and how forcefully to protest every single thing Trump does and says. On one hand, progressives — brilliantly illustrated by cane-shaking moron Rep. Al Green (now censured) — want to obstruct Trump’s official proceedings and chain themselves to the wheels of Washington.
☕️ UNCIVIL WARS ☙ Saturday, March 8, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
Hackman double-death sparks skepticism; more Dem infighting erupts; Trump tightens on Kiev, praises Putin; HHS probes vax-autism link; Dems’ wildest corruption tale yet; and much more.
www.coffeeandcovid.com
The Left’s War on Musk: ActBlue’s Fiery Tactics
Protest have increasingly become a tool not merely for expressing dissent but for exerting coercive pressure upon individuals who diverge from prevailing ideological orthodoxies. Recent organized attacks on Tesla dealerships across the nation provide a troubling illustration of this trend, with explicit efforts aimed at intimidating Tesla’s CEO Elon Musk into abandoning his leadership of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
Central to this disturbing phenomenon are five Democrat-affiliated non-governmental organizations (NGOs)—Troublemakers, Disruption Project, Rise & Resist, Indivisible Project, and the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). Funded significantly through ActBlue, these entities have leveraged protest not merely as an act of political expression but as strategic sabotage aimed squarely at Tesla’s economic interests and Musk’s personal resolve.
The coordinated nature of these demonstrations warrants serious attention. Troublemakers and Disruption Project have overtly embraced tactics of direct confrontation, aligning themselves with the more militant strands of leftist activism. Tesla dealerships from coast to coast have experienced not only picketing and verbal harassment of potential customers but also outright vandalism—incidents of shattered showroom windows, vehicles defaced with accusatory graffiti, arson, and even episodes involving gunfire into dealership windows at night.
In New York City, Rise & Resist, known historically for its decentralized activism, has escalated actions into events punctuated by chaotic disruptions. Leveraging their lack of centralized accountability, they’ve orchestrated high-profile disturbances designed specifically for maximum media coverage, thus amplifying the perception of widespread grassroots opposition. The psychological effect on Tesla employees and customers has been palpable—intended, no doubt, to erode confidence and sales, ultimately impacting Musk’s capacity to govern DOGE effectively.
Likewise, the Indivisible Project, established explicitly to challenge conservative administrations post-2016, and the Democratic Socialists of America, openly advocate a redistributionist economic agenda. Both organizations deploy highly organized protest tactics, drawing upon robust funding sources connected directly through ActBlue, whose principal funders include progressive billionaires like George Soros, Reid Hoffman, and Leah Hunt-Hendrix. It is no mere coincidence that these NGOs are deploying tactics that echo historical methods of political intimidation, recalling darker chapters in American history where business interests and personal liberties were undermined by mob coercion.
Protest have increasingly become a tool not merely for expressing dissent but for exerting coercive pressure upon individuals who diverge from prevailing ideological orthodoxies. Recent organized attacks on Tesla dealerships across the nation provide a troubling illustration of this trend, with explicit efforts aimed at intimidating Tesla’s CEO Elon Musk into abandoning his leadership of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
Central to this disturbing phenomenon are five Democrat-affiliated non-governmental organizations (NGOs)—Troublemakers, Disruption Project, Rise & Resist, Indivisible Project, and the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). Funded significantly through ActBlue, these entities have leveraged protest not merely as an act of political expression but as strategic sabotage aimed squarely at Tesla’s economic interests and Musk’s personal resolve.
The coordinated nature of these demonstrations warrants serious attention. Troublemakers and Disruption Project have overtly embraced tactics of direct confrontation, aligning themselves with the more militant strands of leftist activism. Tesla dealerships from coast to coast have experienced not only picketing and verbal harassment of potential customers but also outright vandalism—incidents of shattered showroom windows, vehicles defaced with accusatory graffiti, arson, and even episodes involving gunfire into dealership windows at night.
In New York City, Rise & Resist, known historically for its decentralized activism, has escalated actions into events punctuated by chaotic disruptions. Leveraging their lack of centralized accountability, they’ve orchestrated high-profile disturbances designed specifically for maximum media coverage, thus amplifying the perception of widespread grassroots opposition. The psychological effect on Tesla employees and customers has been palpable—intended, no doubt, to erode confidence and sales, ultimately impacting Musk’s capacity to govern DOGE effectively.
Likewise, the Indivisible Project, established explicitly to challenge conservative administrations post-2016, and the Democratic Socialists of America, openly advocate a redistributionist economic agenda. Both organizations deploy highly organized protest tactics, drawing upon robust funding sources connected directly through ActBlue, whose principal funders include progressive billionaires like George Soros, Reid Hoffman, and Leah Hunt-Hendrix. It is no mere coincidence that these NGOs are deploying tactics that echo historical methods of political intimidation, recalling darker chapters in American history where business interests and personal liberties were undermined by mob coercion.
DEMOCRACY? UCLA law professor advocates for a military-led coup in the US to overthrow President Trump in order to ‘save democracy’. He’s brainwashing a generation of lawyers…
https://x.com/amuse/status/1898692188860547473/photo/1
