Democratic Operatives

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Hate-Filled Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman Goes on Disrespectful Race-Baiting Attack Against RFK Jr in Committee Hearing – RFK Hilariously Shuts Her Down When Time Expires and She Replies, “So Has Your Legitimacy!”



On Wednesday, she got defiant once again with an outragous attack on the Trump administration for “attempting to legitimize racial discrimination” and accusing Kennedy of pushing “the lie that [Trump] cares about me and black people.” Nothing he could have said could have satisfied her anti-white rage.

The DEI Congresswoman could barely even read her prepared speech, struggling repeatedly to hurl her race-obsessed smears against RFK Jr., the nephew of John F. Kennedy, a driving force for the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Throughout the hate-filled questioning, she refused to let Kennedy respond and constantly interrupted him with more indictments of racism.

Near the end of her five minutes, she was practically screaming at Kennedy, pressing him to answer the question she had refused to allow him to answer. When the clock passed five minutes, Kennedy caused some in the room to break out in laughter and gasps after he cut her off, saying, “My time has expired.”

“Well, then So has your legitimacy!” she stammered in response.



 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard Says James Comey Should be “Arrested and Put Behind Bars” for Threatening the Life of President Trump


May 15, 2025 | Sundance | 183 Comments


Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, is pulling no punches in her view of the direct threat against President Donald Trump that has been made and promoted by former FBI Director James Comey.

Speaking to Fox News, Director Gabbard outlines that there is “no way” James Comey did not know what his threat post was about. Gabbard notes the “86 47” phrase has been circulating the far-left for several months and Mr Comey is well aware what it means. Director Gabbard says in her view the former FBI director should be arrested and put behind bars.

WATCH:






1747399995353.png






Bullshite ... as a career prosecutor he damn well knew or should know wtf 86 means
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Fool around and find out! Yesterday, NBC ran a very encouraging story headlined, “Former FBI Director James Comey under investigation for post seen as a potential threat to Trump's life.” It’s almost like he wants to be locked up.

image 2.png

This week, witless moron and former FBI Director James Comey decided it would be a good idea to post a thinly-veiled assassination threat against President Trump on his Instagram page. Predictably, even though the story was about the government’s response to Comey’s post, NBC didn’t include the actual post in its article. So if you haven’t seen it yet, here it is:

image 3.png

For Portland readers, “86” is a slang term for “get rid of,” and gang members often use it as shorthand for un-aliving someone. “47” refers to Donald Trump, the 47th President. Thus, Comey’s “cool” four-digit shell formation translated to, “kill Trump.” It wasn’t even original. The nut jobs on BlueSky have been using the murderous code since Trump’s first term (at that time, “86 / 45”).

Comey quickly pulled his post after the blowback started. It’s not clear whether that was before or after Secret Service agents paid him a visit. The passive-aggressive former FBI Director childishly claimed he never even knew that criminals used the digits as shorthand for murder. In other words, Comey is using the “I’m a moron” defense, which often, but for obvious reasons, misfires badly.

National Security Director Tulsi Gabbard isn’t buying it:

image 4.png

DNI Tulsi Gabbard (@DNIGabbard) on X

“We’re taking this very seriously,” Gabbard told Fox News anchor Jesse Waters. “There was a guy in Georgia last month issuing threats against my life, and now he’s in jail,” she added. “Do you believe Mr. Comey should be in jail?” Jesse asked.

“James Comey, in my view, should be held accountable and put behind bars for this,” she answered. That’s a fair reading of how we all feel.

If TDS sufferer James Comey’s goal was to get the Trump Administration’s attention, it worked. Nearly every security-adjacent official chimed in, including HHS Director Kristi Noem, FBI Director Kash Patel, and Secret Service Director Sean Curran.

Not coincidentally, Comey is also releasing a fiction novel this month, and odds are good his post was a lame attempt to make himself a cause celebré for deranged Democrats who, he hopes, will buy his book in lunatic solidarity.

The trouble with pranks like this is you never know where they will end. I won’t try to predict the legal outcome. Comey knows the law, and he’s a slimy snake, so presumably he covered his tracks well. But let’s begin with 18 U.S.C. §  871, which is broad enough to apply: “Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance… any communication containing any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President… shall be fined under this title or imprisoned.”

So, to convict Comey, the government must prove three things: a communication, a threat, and that he knew it was a threat. His Instagram post was clearly a communication. The message, “86/47,” will likely be found to be a threat. The challenge will be for the government to prove Comey knew it was a threat. That’ll be where the main fight unfolds.

In Watts v. United States (1969), the Supreme Court cleared an anti-war protester who said during a rally that, if he were drafted, “the first man I want to get in my sights is LBJ.” SCOTUS found that remark to be non-criminal “political hyperbole.”

Similarly, in United States v. Elonis (2015), the Supreme Court considered a teenage rap artist who’d been convicted of threatening various people, including an FBI agent, even though in many of his threatening posts he explicitly wrote, “this is not a threat.” The Court reversed his conviction, holding that prosecutors must prove that a defendant knows that other people would reasonably perceive their statement to be a threat.

Without more evidence about Comey’s knowledge, it remains a tossup. But the better news is that, since the government must prove Comey subjectively knew, the Secret Service now has ample grounds for searching his communications, homes, cars, and anywhere else there might be evidence the former FBI Director understood what the digits meant.

He’s about to enjoy a government-mandated proctological expedition. Bend over, Jim.

When they search Comey, if they find evidence of other crimes, well, that could be a whole different matter. For instance, even if the warrant is for digital messages about threatening the President, but they find classified documents or kiddie porn on Comey’s laptop, then it’s game on.

Comey, who unleashed many of his own criminal investigations on innocent citizens, on grounds much flimsier than his shelly little masterpiece, now has his own chance to find out exactly what it feels like.

I couldn’t say whether it’s likely he’ll be convicted. But one thing seems certain: Comey is about to endure the process, which will probably include his arrest, mugshot, and having to spend a not-insignificant portion of his book royalties on defense counsel. He just gave his enemies fully justified grounds to fire off the whole nine yards of investigative ammo.




 

Sneakers

Just sneakin' around....
PREMO Member
I can't get past someone in such a high position, an adult, pulling such a childish stunt. You'd expect that from immature grade school kids, not professional adults. Seem to be a lot of Dems in this category.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member



Noem: DHS, Secret Service Investigating Comey’s ‘8647’ Post



Karol Markowicz wrote about the “86” slang at The New York Post last month:

In Holland, Mich., Redmond, Ore., and elsewhere, grinning marchers wore shirts and carried placards emblazoned with the number “8647,” pairing the old slang term for murder with a 47 for Trump.
One 8647 protester stood right alongside Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison in Minneapolis.
“Hands off or heads off,” read the message on a life-size guillotine paraded about in Denver.

Comey claimed he saw the shells and had no idea of the deeper meaning of the message.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
IMO Comey came across this---if indeed he did, and did not make it himself---and he ---being the arrogant ******* he is, thought he would be cute and post it on his site. He soon learned that it's not as cute as he thought.

In other words he stepped on his dick. In a couple of weeks it will go away, but it was pretty stupid for a man who should know better.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Democrats DUMBFOUNDED As Liberal Media RELENTLESSLY Confronts Them On Covering Up Biden's Decline!​



 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member

Democrats DUMBFOUNDED As Liberal Media RELENTLESSLY Confronts Them On Covering Up Biden's Decline!​




This should not go away. They cheated to elect an old man with dementia and then lied about it for 4 years. 4 years in which our country was in danger because we had no President. And every country in the world took advantage of it.
 

PJay

Well-Known Member
"HILLARY CLINTON As some of you know, I was the Air Force Military Aide for Bill Clinton, lived in the White House, traveled everywhere they traveled, and carried the “nuclear football.” As such, I was always in close proximity to both Bill and Hill. Among the military who served in the White House and the professional White House staff, the Clinton administration was infamously known for its lack of professionalism and courtesy, though few ever spoke about it. But when it came to rudeness, it was Hillary Clinton who was the most feared person in the administration. She set the tone. From the very first day in my assignment. When I first arrived to work in the White House, my predecessor warned me. “You can get away with pissing off Bill but if you make her mad, she’ll rip your heart out.” I heeded those words. I did make him mad a few times, but I never really pissed her off. I knew the ramifications. I learned very quickly that the administration’s day-to-day character, whether inside or outside of DC, depended solely on the presence or absence of Hillary. Her reputation preceded her. We used to say that when Hillary was gone, it was a frat party. When she was home, it was “Schindler’s List.” In my first few days on the job, and remember I essentially lived there, I realized there were different rules for Hillary. She instructed the senior staff, including me, that she didn’t want to be forced to encounter us. We were instructed that “whenever Mrs. Clinton is moving through the halls, be as inconspicuous as possible.” She did not want to see “staff” and be forced to “interact” with anyone. No matter their position in the building. Many a time, I’d see mature, professional adults, working in the most important building in the world, scurrying into office doorways to escape Hillary’s line of sight. I’d hear whispering, “She’s coming, she’s coming!” I could be walking down a West Wing hallway, midday, busier than hell, people doing the administration’s work whether in the press office, medical unit, wherever. She’d walk in and they’d scatter. She was the Nazi schoolmarm and the rest of us were expected to hide as though we were kids in trouble. I wasn’t a kid, I was a professional officer and pilot. I said “I’m not doing that.” There was also a period of time when she attempted to ban military uniforms in the White House. It was the reelection year of 1996, and she was trying to craft the narrative that the military was not a priority in the Clinton administration. As a military aide, carrying the football, and working closely with the Secret Service, I objected to that. It simply wasn’t a matter of her political agenda; it was national security. If the balloon went up, the Secret Service would need to find me as quickly as possible. Seconds matter. Finding the aide in military uniform made complete sense. Besides, what commander in chief wouldn’t want to advertise his leadership and command? She finally relented because the Secret Service weighed in. The Clintons are corrupt beyond words. Hillary is evil, vindictive, and profane. Hillary is a bitch."

 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Glass Houses and Grenades: Hillary Clinton’s Sudden Outrage Over National Security





“How much dumber will this get?” — Hillary Clinton, 2025​

That’s not parody. That’s the actual tweet Hillary Clinton fired off while reacting to a report about Trump administration officials inadvertently sharing sensitive military information in a Signal group chat, one that included a journalist by mistake. Yes, it’s dumb. Yes, it’s a problem. But hearing Hillary Clinton of all people rail against national security breaches is like Al Capone lecturing Wall Street on tax compliance.


She asked, “How much dumber will this get?”

Madam Secretary, we already have your record to answer that.



The $500,000 Moscow Speech and the Uranium One Deal​

Haiti: A Promise Betrayed​


Chinese Espionage and Clinton-Era Carelessness​

Suppose we’re discussing national security failures. In that case, it’s worth rewinding to the 1990s, when Chinese spies penetrated U.S. defense labs and stole secrets about the W-88 miniaturized nuclear warhead, one of the crown jewels of our deterrent arsenal.

The 1999 Cox Report, a bipartisan House investigation, laid bare the damage. It detailed how Chinese operatives accessed next-gen nuclear designs, missile tech, and classified lab programs under Bill Clinton’s watch.

What did the administration do? Not nearly enough. The story went public only after intense congressional pressure. Back then, there was no social media for a Clinton to tweet their remorse.


These breaches gave the Chinese Communist Party a technological leap forward, one that our sons and daughters in uniform may one day have to answer for. But today, we’re told the Clintons are national security hawks.


“We Came, We Saw, He Died”​


Ethics for Sale: Foreign Money and the Clinton Foundation​

Let’s not forget the millions that flowed into the Clinton Foundation while Hillary was secretary of state.

An agreement was in place: the foundation would clear any foreign donations with the State Department. But that promise didn’t hold. Algeria gave $500,000 for “Haiti relief” without vetting. Countries with spotty human rights records, such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE, donated tens of millions.

Simultaneously, these same countries received U.S. weapons sales at increasing levels. Coincidence?

Maybe. But the Clintons built a fundraising juggernaut whose cash flow was so intertwined with a global influence that tracking motives became impossible.

And now we’re supposed to believe that posting a tweet gives her moral clarity?
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Noem: DHS, Secret Service Investigating Comey’s ‘8647’ Post



Karol Markowicz wrote about the “86” slang at The New York Post last month:

Comey claimed he saw the shells and had no idea of the deeper meaning of the message.



For James Comey, there should be a higher loyalty standard


By M. Walter


I remember reading somewhere that there were those working with James Comey who referred to him as “St. James” Comey because of his absolute certainty that he was always right about everything and had an insufferably smug way of letting you know it. Seemed credible at the time. Seems more credible now.

Here’s how Amazon describes his non-fiction book, A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies, and Leadership:

In his book, former FBI director James Comey shares his never-before-told experiences from some of the highest-stakes situations of his career in the past two decades of American government, exploring what good, ethical leadership looks like, and how it drives sound decisions. His journey provides an unprecedented entry into the corridors of power, and a remarkable lesson in what makes an effective leader.

“Good, ethical” leaders don’t do these things:






 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

For James Comey, there should be a higher loyalty standard


By M. Walter


I remember reading somewhere that there were those working with James Comey who referred to him as “St. James” Comey because of his absolute certainty that he was always right about everything and had an insufferably smug way of letting you know it. Seemed credible at the time. Seems more credible now.

Comey knows exactly what '8647' means. The Trump 'resistance' is out of control. | Opinion



I hear almost daily from disgruntled liberals who wish President Donald Trump would die or face some other horrific misfortune (they wish the same for me, too).

It’s easy to become numb to this inflammatory – and hysterical – rhetoric.

Yet, when a former top U.S. law enforcement official enters the fray of such discourse, that’s another matter altogether.

On May 15, former FBI Director James Comey posted a photo on Instagram that depicted the number “8647” fashioned with seashells.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Report: DNC on Brink of ‘Chaos’ over Potential Ouster of Vice Chair David Hogg








While Hogg has received criticisms from people within the DNC such as DNC Chairman Ken Martin, the vote to oust Hogg and Kenyatta came in response to a complaint that Kalyn Free issued, the New York Times reported.

Free, who had been one of the candidates running to be vice chair of the DNC, argued that the “party had wrongly combined two separate questions into a single vote,” which reportedly put the female candidates at a “disadvantage.”

The ruling by the credentials committee on Monday was not technically related to Mr. Hogg’s plans to engage in primaries. Instead, it was the result of a complaint from Kalyn Free, one of the losing candidates in the vice chair race. Ms. Free said the party had wrongly combined two separate questions into a single vote, putting at a disadvantage the female candidates because of the party’s gender-parity rules.

Martin has called for Hogg to either remain neutral in politics, or to step down from his position, Politico reported.

“Party officers have one job: to be fair stewards of a process that invites every Democrat to the table — regardless of personal views or allegiances,” Martin said in a statement.

In a thread on X, Martin explained that a “neutrality pledge isn’t about silencing anyone,” but rather that it ensured that candidates and their supporters “can participate in” the primary process “without interference from party leadership.”

“It ensures that candidates, and the millions of supporters behind them, can participate in our primary process without interference from party leadership,” Martin wrote. “It means no thumb on the scale, no backroom deals, no favoritism.”
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Comey’s Latest Novel Might Be The Smoking Gun Proving He Intended To Threaten Trump



However, it gets worse than that for Comey. After posting the offending shell photo, the very next post on Instagram was him posting the favorable Publisher’s Weekly review of his third crime novel, out next week. What’s it about, you ask?

Former FBI director Comey (Westport) reunites the protagonists of his first two legal thrillers for his strongest outing yet. U.S. attorney Carmen Garcia is trying to take down Samuel Buchanan, a far-right media personality with a popular podcast vilifying those he thinks are destroying America: intellectuals, immigrants, and people of color. Garcia believes Buchanan went far beyond the protection of the First Amendment when he singled out his enemies by name and suggested “something should be done” about them. His fans have obliged, killing or grievously injuring some of his foes. In a series of tense and exhilarating courtroom scenes, Garcia works with Deputy U.S. Attorney Nora Carleton to bring Buchanan down. Then, just as they’ve convicted him, a new threat emerges …

So let me get this straight, Comey’s book is about successfully prosecuting a right-wing commentator for making vaguely worded threats? Really? (Also, “Samuel Buchanan”? I guess “Patrick Francis” wouldn’t have been on the nose enough for his liberal audience.)

Now obviously this is just a capsule review, and perhaps Comey’s novel goes into the legal complexities involved — the review goes on to say there’s “hand-wringing about following legal and constitutional protocol.” But given Comey’s demonstrably terrible and partisan judgment as a law enforcement official, it’s hard to give him the benefit of the doubt.

Fortunately for Comey, threatening the president this way isn’t necessarily a crime. (Comey probably should have been prosecuted for about a dozen other things that happened at the FBI during Russiagate.) There’s a Supreme Court case dealing with presidential threats that very generously extends the First Amendment to cover a lot of threats. In the ’60s, an 18-year-old who didn’t want to be drafted got tried and convicted for saying, “If they ever make me carry a rifle, the first man I want to get in my sights is L.B.J.” The Warren court basically said that this was “political hyperbole,” and “context, and regarding the expressly conditional nature of the statement and the reaction of the listeners” must be considered, and they decided this was not a real threat.
 
Top