Yes.Does not apply to the Top Dog, el Numero Uno, Head Man, Big Boss Man, Big Cheese, Chief Executive, etc.
Can I have SGI's job now?
Yes.Does not apply to the Top Dog, el Numero Uno, Head Man, Big Boss Man, Big Cheese, Chief Executive, etc.
Can I have SGI's job now?
Not really, let's split the "let go" into terminated, with prejudice and terminated without.As opposed to private industry, where I've seen plenty of people fired, because the boss just didn't like them.
but he has to delete the PROGRAMS not just the people.
Both. RIFing employees has little effect. It’s the cost of the PROGRAMS that take real money.Just defund or end the programs ?
I know many have tried
Actually since it's a presidential proclamation and not an act of Congress, Trump can rescind it the second his ass hits the seat and fire everyone in the next second.
Let the bodies hit the floor....
I learned something new today.Among cannabis consumers, chronic can be used as slang for marijuana itself, but many users reserve the term for particularly potent strains of the plant (e.g., smoke some chronic or smoke the chronic)
1.High quality weed, usually strains produced for high THC and yeild. The term "chronic" also may be used for good weed when the specific strain is not known.
That's pretty much I observed in my 30+ years contracting with the Feds.But yeah, it's really difficult to fire anyone, other than for something egregious like that. Usually, they give the offender an on-the-spot award, promote them, and dump them off on another program, making them someone else's problem.
I was part of the big RIF after Vietnam, but that was the military. If there was a similar civilian RIF, I wasn't aware of it. A lot of us went into the reserves to make time toward retirement, back then.Both. RIFing employees has little effect. It’s the cost of the PROGRAMS that take real money.
I’m sure you, as can I, identify loads of government programs that are much better handled by the private sector, where there is a profit motive. Competition for that profit creates better outcomes/profits.
This is what bugs me about the notion that we need a chief executive for our nation who can run it like a business. NO! Governments do not seek profits. Capitalists do. Let them.
I needed to make it to 2023 for 25 years. I did buy back my military time, so I think I would have had credit for 30 years for the military and the civilian combined.I was part of the big RIF after Vietnam, but that was the military. If there was a similar civilian RIF, I wasn't aware of it. A lot of us went into the reserves to make time toward retirement, back then.
Then there were the BRACs, but even then, the Gov't made every attempt to relocate people to other programs; to other locales. I had a landlady in San Diego who had moved from Hawaii to California during one such, but left the Fed when they wanted her to move to Ohio, or Philly, I think it was, she said no, and that was it. I don't think she had the age for MRA, though I think she had enough time. Which sucks.
They will do buyouts (VERA/VSIP). My late wife, who was a GS-11 (which is high up for Philly) benefited from a buyout, as well as retraining. I retired as a GS-13/7 on a buyout, so I took it. If I'd had had a crystal ball in 2019, I would not have. I would have held on for at least a couple of more years to make 25 years. Still, I'm not mad about it. She was CSRS, so I think she got a VERA, but I was FERS, so I think mine was a VSIP, but I'm not going to swear to anything.
How much Corona do I bring in when reporting? Have to smooth things with HR.Yes.
Well, drives had lower capacities back then; what else was he to do?I spent 22+ years working in the federal government. All that time, and I never realized anyone could be fired "on a whim."
Very few things could get you fired from the Fed. As I was moving in, during my 1st year, the po-po were escorting a man off base for downloading so much porn that he filled up his S: drive, his H: drive, a major portion of the V: drive (shared with other members of his program), and had asked for more storage because all those AND his hard disk drive were full - and came back a second time for more storage.
Oh... I wouldn't do that if I were you. HR HATES when people bring him Corona.How much Corona do I bring in when reporting? Have to smooth things with HR.
So you're saying that HR isn't cheap, but can be had? Good to know.Oh... I wouldn't do that if I were you. HR HATES when people bring him Corona.
This protection of the Deep State is little more than a blatant admission that there IS a Deep State.
Nothing you can undo with your worthless hand waving.Good thing thats not what this bill does.
It's only the editorializing by the OP that does that.
Despite Vrails propaganda what Biden's proposal does is counteract an extremely radical plan by Trump and the heritage foundation to change hundreds of thousands of federal employees to at will workers so they can be fired for not going along with Trumps shady policy changes known as project 2025.
is a collection of policy proposals to reshape the executive branch of the U.S. federal government at an unprecedented scale in the event of a Republican victory in the 2024 U.S. presidential election.[2][3] Established in 2022, the project seeks to recruit tens of thousands of conservatives to Washington, D.C., to replace existing federal civil service workers which Republicans characterize as the "deep state", to further the objectives of the next Republican president.[4] Although the project cannot promote a specific presidential candidate, many contributors have close ties to Donald Trump and the Trump 2024 presidential campaign.[5] The plan would perform a swift restructuring of the executive branch under a maximalist version of the unitary executive theory — a theory proposing the president of the United States has absolute power over the executive branch — upon inauguration.[3][6]
The development of the plan is led by the The Heritage Foundation, an American conservative think tank, in collaboration with over 100 partners including Turning Point USA led by Charlie Kirk; the Conservative Partnership Institute including former Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows as senior partner; the Center for Renewing America led by former Trump-appointee Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought; and America First Legal, led by former Trump Senior Advisor Stephen Miller.[7][8]
Project 2025 envisions widespread changes across the entire government, particularly with regard to economic and social policy and the role of the federal government and federal agencies. The plan proposes slashing U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) funding, dismantling the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security, gutting environmental and climate change regulations to favor fossil fuel production, and eliminating the cabinet Departments of Education and Commerce.[9] Citing an anonymous source, The Washington Post reported in November 2023, prior to the project's release, that Project 2025 includes immediately invoking the Insurrection Act of 1807 to deploy the military for domestic law enforcement and directing the DOJ to pursue Trump adversaries.[10] Project Director Paul Dans, a former Trump administration official, said in September 2023 that Project 2025 is "systematically preparing to march into office and bring a new army, aligned, trained, and essentially weaponized conservatives ready to do battle against the deep state."[11]
Trump may sound moderate on abortion. The groups setting his agenda definitely aren’t.
These radical social conservatives could define Trump’s second term.www.vox.com
Actually since it's a presidential proclamation and not an act of Congress, Trump can rescind it the second his ass hits the seat and fire everyone in the next second.
Let the bodies hit the floor....
142k messages, from one account.