joedancer said:
Janet Starr Hull has a very diverse background with Degrees and experience in geology and international geography, environmental science, fitness training, and nutrition.
czygvtwkr said:Last I checked geoligists studied rocks, geographists studied countries and their boundries, enviromental scientists study landfills, fitness trainers studied that exercise was good, and nutritionists study that eating chocolate cake all day makes you get fat.
Nothing in this woman's background gives her any expertise in the field of biochemistry. I suspect she has a lot of stock in sugar cane or corn syrup plants.
I use regular sugar, but would consider Splenda if it were healthier. IMO the benefits don't outweigh the risk, and we're not a particularly unhealthy family to begin with, so we'll stick with sugar.czygvtwkr said:Not the same but closer than Nutrasweet. It also depends on how much heat you use, the artificial sweetners handle heat differently than sugar.
splenda's website does a pretty good job explaining it
joedancer said:This is one of many places to find out about sucrolose. Just do a google search on it. Spend a little time investigating what you are putting in your body. It might be worth it.
My best,
joe
http://www.mercola.com/2000/dec/3/sucralose_dangers.htm#
http://www.rense.com/general63/SPLENte.htm
http://www.red-ice.net/specialreports/sucralose.html