CMC122
Go Braves!
FromTexas said:You are in direct violation of the get a clue act.

FromTexas said:You are in direct violation of the get a clue act.
TruthDetector88 said:ummmm food for thought the 14th amendment abolished slavery it dont not make slaves citizens it has to be ratified first our founding fathers of the usa where christains if u dont like our country get out im not religous but where does it stop we fight for freedom cause freedom isnt free besides all wars we have fought have been religous wars to a point no one can deny
How can you tell WHAT the hell he means???Ken King said:Are you sure you don't mean the 13th Amendment?
UrbanPancake said:If you saw a white man driving a Lexus would you think he was a drug dealer, or an Executive?
vraiblonde said:How can you tell WHAT the hell he means???
Truth, you probably have something to say. And occasionally I can decipher it. But you could be my new best friend if you would PLEASE use sentence structure and punctuation. I say this not to bust on you, but as a person who is genuinely interested in what you have to say.
![]()
Bruzilla said:It's all about numbers. Only about .0001% of Muslim or Arab males are terrorists or actively desire to take action against the United States. Unfortunately, 95% of today's terrorists that pose a threat to the United States are Muslim/Arab males. So, you aren't likely to find many of these guys unless you search this group. You wouldn't go looking for a forest in a McDonalds, you wouldn't look for an African Elephant herd in a 7/11, so why would you look for terrorists where you aren't likely to find them? All that does is divide and weaken your search assets.
Is that fair to all those millions of Arab/Muslim males who receive undue scrutiny and suspicion? No. But let them get mad at their brethern who caused this problem, not at the US government.
Bruzilla said:Is that fair to all those millions of Arab/Muslim males who receive undue scrutiny and suspicion? No. But let them get mad at their brethern who caused this problem, not at the US government.
Bruzilla said:It's all about numbers. Only about .0001% of Muslim or Arab males are terrorists or actively desire to take action against the United States. Unfortunately, 95% of today's terrorists that pose a threat to the United States are Muslim/Arab males. So, you aren't likely to find many of these guys unless you search this group. You wouldn't go looking for a forest in a McDonalds, you wouldn't look for an African Elephant herd in a 7/11, so why would you look for terrorists where you aren't likely to find them? All that does is divide and weaken your search assets.
Is that fair to all those millions of Arab/Muslim males who receive undue scrutiny and suspicion? No. But let them get mad at their brethern who caused this problem, not at the US government.
UrbanPancake said:If you saw a white man driving a Lexus would you think he was a drug dealer, or an Executive?
UrbanPancake said:What is a WASP? I don't think most White Americans understand what's it like to live in America when your not White. Our Constitution protects the rights of all Americans, not just white folk. I don't think its fair to target someone based on the color of their skin, or because there Arab.
Well at least you used racism and affirmative action in the same statement.. If you believe that blacks and Hispanics NEED affirmative action to get ahead, then you are the racist, saying they aren't as smart, they aren't as capable as a white person. Racism behind the guise of "Let me help my less intelligent, less capable brother"UrbanPancake said:Please tell me you guys aren't stereotyping? This is why there is still racism in America. This is why we still need affimative action.
You probably tied it up in as neat a package that could be done.Voter2002 said:You know.....everyone on this board is giving UrbanPancake EXACTLY what he wants...a place for him to rant & rave and cause hate & discontent. He makes one post, and within hours...BAM....600+ views & 58 replies.
We all know what he is about. Personally, I (and Vrai and probably others) have placed him on IGNORE and I think it would be a good thing if everyone did the same.
I am all for intelligant debate, but that kind of debate is impossible with UP. Not that I'm trying to force him to see things the republican way, it's just that if it comes from republicans, it's vile and not worth the gum stuck to the bottom of his shoe. His ultra-liberal views are our only savior according to him - EVERYTHING that comes out of us is 100% wrong. That's not debate. That's him trying to shove his ultra-liberal agenda down our throats!
UP...if you reply, I won't see it....(thank God!)![]()
For the most part, what you say here is correct. I don't always agree with your comments, nor the issues you raise, however, you are not as extreme, or radical, nor do you seem to be promoting an agenda, as he/she does.Aimhigh2000 said:I agree that UP has some far ended views, however, I have gotten my fair share of negative karma for some of my posts, and I am moderate. It is hard being a democrat because I (we) are instantly labled as leftist liberals. I have found it very hard at times to have conversations with some on here because of their far right views. UP may be an extreme leftist, but, I can say that if I disagree with the slightest conservative view, I get knocked for it as well. Just keep that in mind. I am a happy moderate, and plan on keeping it that way. UP is not the only one that posts on here with extreme views.![]()
He could be a pimp ;\Kain99 said:Yes, please people! The next time you see a muslim extremist hiding a box in the airport just sit down and shuddup! While we are on the subject .... Just because a black man hasn't worked in ten years and is driving a Lexus and has 20 gold chains does NOT mean he's a drug dealer!![]()