Gonna have to look at it, the same way government does.The problem isn't having to rely on Uncle Sugar for retirement. The problem is that we are FORCED to pay into a faltering system.
Just another tax.
Gonna have to look at it, the same way government does.The problem isn't having to rely on Uncle Sugar for retirement. The problem is that we are FORCED to pay into a faltering system.
All those lightbulbs were replaced by dim little LEDsThey explicitly told us we could expect this and they even gave it a very clear name: redistribution of wealth. The thing is the general public assumed the 1% would be the purse. Right about now you would think the lightbulbs would be going on and it should affect who we vote for across all levels of government.
What has been very often proposed is that everyone should be added to the TSP - Thrift Savings Plan - that federal workers are required to invest in. I've read several analyses that clearly shows - THAT would completely BREAK the TSP.The problem with mandated retirement accounts instead of socialist insecurity is that there would be severe restrictions on how one can invest, i.e., how much risk one can assume, how much of a speculative component can be included, etc. such that it likely wouldn’t be much more performant than what the government can furnish.
I remember it being suggested in the 80s that it won’t be available when I reach retirement, and I’ve planned accordingly. I now understand that it won’t disappear completely, but rather many will be means tested out.
OK with me. Not interested in relying on government for any component of my retirement income. My retirement income is and will continue to be substantially more than my working income was.