Ex-Porn Star Breaks Down in Tears While Describing How People Treat Her — and Reveals Why Young Girl

[GURPS]

Ex-Porn Star Breaks Down in Tears While Describing How People Treat Her — and Reveals Why Young Girls Should Avoid the Adult Film Industry


Olson, who said that she encountered a plethora of issues after she left behind the $30,000 to $60,000 per month that she was making in porn and entered the mainstream acting industry, shared details about the personal struggles that she still faces after people find out about her past.

“I get so disappointed when I go out and I meet a new friend and it turns out they don’t want to be my friend anymore,” Olson said. “People treat me as if I am a pedophile. They don’t treat me like an ex-sex worker. They treat me like I would somehow be damaging to children.”


one of the commenters ....


Cold14me
-
Mar. 25, 2016 at 1:45pm

I’m sorry I watched this video. I thought I would find a repentant woman that was sorry she did porn movies for moral reasons. Instead she blamed other people for the way they viewed her and she glorified the industry as being fun and being able to make money! Lady you have reaped what you’ve sown. These are the fruits of your labor and the warning should’ve been don’t do porn movies because it will destroy your life and your soul. Not shaming people for they way they treat “sex workers”! Wow are you blind.

 

[Larry Gude]

It is always interesting how people end up being very judgemental about porn and yet porn is the most viewed media product we have so who are these freaking people?

 

[Gilligan]

Wait...what? She's stopped doing porn?

Dang.

 

[vraiblonde]

They don’t treat me like an ex-sex worker

Sounds like they do. :shrug:

 

[This_person]

If she wants to be treated like an RN with 2.5 kids, she probably should have been an RN.... :shrug:

Consequences to personal actions :shrug:

She got the checks of a porn star - wonder if she'd give those up, too.

 

[black dog]

It is always interesting how people end up being very judgemental about porn and yet porn is the most viewed media product we have so who are these freaking people?

Have you ever wondered why almost every adult book / novelty store has parking behind the building also ???
It's for the judgmental folks to park without being seen..

 

[Larry Gude]

Have you ever wondered why almost every adult book / novelty store has parking behind the building also ???
It's for the judgmental folks to park without being seen..

Lotta parking room behind them internets, too.

 

[black dog]

If she wants to be treated like an RN with 2.5 kids, she probably should have been an RN.... :shrug:

Consequences to personal actions :shrug:

She got the checks of a porn star - wonder if she'd give those up, too.

Yep.. It's gotta be tough to go mainstream movies after doing a few double anal videos to make the rent....

 

[Gilligan]

Lotta parking room behind them internets, too.

 

[PeoplesElbow]

You know the worst thing about this is that her being in porn was honest work, however when Paris Hilton and Kim Kardashian sex videos were "leaked" they became huge stars and they are probably way bigger whores than this actual whore.

 

[vraiblonde]

Let's get real: is there any one of us who wants their daughter to grow up to be a porn actress?


Didn't think so.

So let's not be too sanctimonious in calling others judgmental when they don't treat chicks who #### strangers for a living with the same respect they would give a nurse or engineer. We like to watch movies with crazed killers, too, but frown on those who actually do that for a living.

 

[Larry Gude]

You know the worst thing about this is that her being in porn was honest work, however when Paris Hilton and Kim Kardashian sex videos were "leaked" they became huge stars and they are probably way bigger whores than this actual whore.

Ah yes but our puritan DNA seems to allow us the freedom to worship that sort of thing but only up to some vague point. I mean, look at all our interest in people who debase themselves for our entertainment debate after debate all so we may claim the cleanest of them, by our vote, to be the most virtuous of the whores. Would one honestly wish our child to do that over the clear honesty of simply saying 'I #### for money'? Or, better yet, 'I no longer do so'?

 

[This_person]

It is always interesting how people end up being very judgemental about porn and yet porn is the most viewed media product we have so who are these freaking people?

If you're judging it by "most viewed", then we all want to be in car wrecks because they're pretty highly viewed, and we either want to be terrorists or killed by terrorists because I think every person in the US watched and rewatched and rewatched again the Twin Towers falling and other terroristic activities. We are truly proud of serial killers, too, because we watch movie after movie after TV show after documentary after court trial about serial killers.

Yep, if you judge people's acceptance of others based on watching them, you certainly have a valid point.

 

[This_person]

You know the worst thing about this is that her being in porn was honest work, however when Paris Hilton and Kim Kardashian sex videos were "leaked" they became huge stars and they are probably way bigger whores than this actual whore.

I think the difference is that these little girls you're speaking of (a) wear their whoreness like crown - because it is what coroneted them, and (b) claim that this was for love, not money or fame. Everyone has had some information about them they'd rather not have known made public to someone they didn't want to know it, so they look at these girls as kindred spirits who just had a bad thing happen to them when they were being kinky with their loved one. After all, who hasn't been kinky with their loved one in one way or another, so poor poor them.

But, again, they own it. They don't say, "well, poor pitiful me; I got rich and famous from naked videos of me." This girl ####ed strangers for money, for years, on camera, and now says "don't judge me for who I am, judge me for who I wish I was."

As a Christian, my thought is, "let he who is without sin cast the first stone", because she's not mine to judge. However, loving her and hating her sin doesn't mean I'd want her to marry one of my sons.

 

[Larry Gude]

If you're judging it by "most viewed", then we all want to be in car wrecks because they're pretty highly viewed, and we either want to be terrorists or killed by terrorists because I think every person in the US watched and rewatched and rewatched again the Twin Towers falling and other terroristic activities. We are truly proud of serial killers, too, because we watch movie after movie after TV show after documentary after court trial about serial killers.

Yep, if you judge people's acceptance of others based on watching them, you certainly have a valid point.

Maybe you didn't mean this but I think you help my point. Why do we watch car wrecks, motorcycle crashes and acts of religious violence? For pure reasons?

 

[This_person]

Maybe you didn't mean this but I think you help my point. Why do we watch car wrecks, motorcycle crashes and acts of religious violence? For pure reasons?

I think most watch because it provides them with a base sexual titillation that entices them to act out individually or with other(s) to satisfy that basic carnal urge. It's animalistic, and the common joke is that most people are instantly mortified that they did it - others just don't care because they are more animalistic in their base nature. Others do it as a form of punishment to themselves - an addiction to the humiliation they feel and they see others engaging in. In that way it is no different from any other self-destructive addiction - they want to harm themselves (in the case of porn, both mentally and physically).

It's pure base urge, like a monkey masturbating in a zoo as you walk by, or flinging its poo at you. Our better, more civilized and advanced selves find it horrific. The people urging us to forgo religious morals tell us its just nature, beautiful as "Love Story", and nothing of which to be concerned. The realistic in us agree that we wouldn't be proud of our daughter for starring in "Anal Adventures of Anna".

My point was that you said a lot of people watch so why shouldn't it be okay, and I think that's a silly standard by which to judge the acceptable behavior of people. I have no desire to make porn illegal - people have the right to debase themselves through starring in or watching it as they please. But, don't tell me that the stars should be treated like RN's, as this woman who had multiple sex partners who had been strangers moments before, for money, on camera wanted. Those are not equals, and it is unreasonable of her to believe they are equals.

 

[Larry Gude]

I think most watch because it provides them with a base sexual titillation that entices them to act out individually or with other(s) to satisfy that basic carnal urge. It's animalistic, and the common joke is that most people are instantly mortified that they did it - others just don't care because they are more animalistic in their base nature. Others do it as a form of punishment to themselves - an addiction to the humiliation they feel and they see others engaging in. In that way it is no different from any other self-destructive addiction - they want to harm themselves (in the case of porn, both mentally and physically).

It's pure base urge, like a monkey masturbating in a zoo as you walk by, or flinging its poo at you. Our better, more civilized and advanced selves find it horrific. The people urging us to forgo religious morals tell us its just nature, beautiful as "Love Story", and nothing of which to be concerned. The realistic in us agree that we wouldn't be proud of our daughter for starring in "Anal Adventures of Anna".

My point was that you said a lot of people watch so why shouldn't it be okay, and I think that's a silly standard by which to judge the acceptable behavior of people. I have no desire to make porn illegal - people have the right to debase themselves through starring in or watching it as they please. But, don't tell me that the stars should be treated like RN's, as this woman who had multiple sex partners who had been strangers moments before, for money, on camera. Those are not equals, and it is unreasonable of her to believe they are equals.

And yet we laud and celebrate and enrich and worship someone who, say, acts out killing and destroying in the movies.
Not sure we have our perversion and debasement meters well calibrated.

 

[This_person]

And yet we laud and celebrate and enrich and worship someone who, say, acts out killing and destroying in the movies.
Not sure we have our perversion and debasement meters well calibrated.

For example? Who do you believe we "worship"? If you mean John Wayne in "In Harm's Way", that was a person portraying a guy who helped keep our country save from people who attacked us first (he was playing Navy in the Pacific against the Japanese). If you mean Freddy Kruger, I would say that most people find the character horrific and are entertained at being scared by something they know poses no real threat. However, there are people who find ol' Freddy a role model, and I find those people mentally unstable.

 

[Larry Gude]

For example? Who do you believe we "worship"? If you mean John Wayne in "In Harm's Way", that was a person portraying a guy who helped keep our country save from people who attacked us first (he was playing Navy in the Pacific against the Japanese). If you mean Freddy Kruger, I would say that most people find the character horrific and are entertained at being scared by something they know poses no real threat. However, there are people who find ol' Freddy a role model, and I find those people mentally unstable.

Clooney, Pitt, Gibson, insert act hero here. Look at our praise for Chris kyle and Marcus Luttrell. Anyone who read their books has a lot to overcome vs. how they are portrayed in their movies.

Question: who do you respect more: someone who acts out love in a movie or violence?

 

[This_person]

Clooney, Pitt, Gibson, insert act hero here. Look at our praise for Chris kyle and Marcus Luttrell. Anyone who read their books has a lot to overcome vs. how they are portrayed in their movies.

Question: who do you respect more: someone who acts out love in a movie or violence?

I would say motivation (love or violence) has a lot to do with who I would respect in life or movies. Chris Kyle, the movie character, was both flawed (as all humans are) and acting in a good way. We are not to murder, not forbidden to kill. There's a difference.