Midnightrider
Well-Known Member
I forget that pretty much every time I read one of your posts.
There is evidence - clear and hard evidence that nobody has disputed and people got fired over - that the DNC rigged the primary in favor of Hillary Clinton. Again, the DNC has never denied what they did, and DWS lost her job over it. So if Trump says that the Dems rig elections, well, he's correct and it's a matter of undisputed record.
It doesn't matter that Bernie is okay with getting screwed and supports the woman who did the screwing. That is not the point. The point IS that there is a precedent of the Democrats rigging elections to get a certain outcome.
While you're at it, please explain all those superdelegates who pledged for Hillary BEFORE their state even held a primary election or caucus. In several cases, the voters went for Bernie, but the superdelegates pledged for Hillary, which gave her a win in the state. If you take a look at superdelegates and how they play into Democrat primaries, rigging elections is built right into the DNC rule book right off the bat.
So tell me again what makes you think they don't rig elections? Do you think that perhaps they only screw their own and rig elections against their own party members, and would never do something like that to a Republican?
I know complex thought is difficult for you. Try reading the first line of the second part that you quoted again. It's pretty straightforward.