First Monday In October and All Is Still Not Well!

[Kyle]

Five months later, Supreme Court still investigating who leaked the abortion case

A new Supreme Court term is underway and the identity of the leaker is still unknown

The Supreme Court is still investigating how a draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade was leaked and has yet to issue a report or disclose the identity of the leaker, five months after the probe was announced.

On May 2, Politico published a draft of the decision in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the major abortion decision that would eventually overturn Roe v. Wade. The unprecedented leak triggered protests across the country and at the Justices' homes that continued for months.

Also in September, Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch said at a conference that he hopes the committee overseeing the investigation into the leaker has a report "soon," according to a Wall Street Journal report. It's unclear if that investigation report would be made available to the public.

Five months later, Supreme Court still investigating who leaked the abortion case

Five months since the draft Dobbs opinion was leaked and a new Supreme Court term underway, and we still don't know the identity of the leaker, despite reports that a report on the investigation could be coming "soon."

www.foxnews.com

 

[Gilligan]

They know damned well who leaked it. Knew right away. Releasing the information is undoubtedly "awkward" so they sit on it and hope the story just goes away.

 

[SamSpade]

The suspect pool has to be damned small. And someone knows - perhaps all of them.

Me, I think Sotomayor had one of her staff leak it. Which would be an impeachable offense.

 

[Grumpy]

The suspect pool has to be damned small. And someone knows - perhaps all of them.

Me, I think Sotomayor had one of her staff leak it. Which would be an impeachable offense.

But they will try to pin it on one of the conservative judges so they can impeach and gain a liberal seat.

 

[SamSpade]

But they will try to pin it on one of the conservative judges so they can impeach and gain a liberal seat.

Except there’s no logical reason for a conservative to leak it. Leaking it was to provoke public reaction in an absurd attempt to sway the court.

As if the court is supposed to work that way.

 

[Grumpy]

Except there’s no logical reason for a conservative to leak it. Leaking it was to provoke public reaction in an absurd attempt to sway the court.

As if the court is supposed to work that way.

Well..when it comes to Democrats, whats logical??

 

[Hijinx]

No doubt whatsoever in my mind that one of the seated liberal Justices was involved in the leak and that fact is the reason we are being kept in the dark.

 

[vraiblonde]

They know damned well who leaked it. Knew right away. Releasing the information is undoubtedly "awkward" so they sit on it and hope the story just goes away.

Obviously this ^^

These government people (including SCOTUS) are not highly motivated to do things that are in the interest of We the People. They jump right on their pet projects targeting American citizens - J-6, for example - but when it comes to investigating government malfeasance they're like, meh, we'll get to it when we get to it...or not.....