Fox News Fair and Balanced

Makavide

Not too talkative
Just curious.
At the exact same time Tucker was talking about Pandas, what was CNN actually covering and by whom?
At the exact same time Tucker was talking about Pandas, what was MSNBC actually covering and by whom?
At the exact same time Tucker was talking about Pandas, what was BBC actually covering and by whom?
At the exact same time Tucker was talking about Pandas, what was New York Times actually covering and by whom? (however, this is a different news medium and shouldn't be compared)
At the exact same time Tucker was talking about Pandas, what was Washington Post actually covering and by whom? (however, this is a different news medium and shouldn't be compared)
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
I don't know what Assad did for sure, I don't know what our response should be.
Here is what I do know.
The news agencies the politicians, all want us to go to war with Syria.

Now if we do, That becomes Trumps war and they will turn on him like rabid dogs.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
You mouth breathers make ups lot of stuff in your head.


While arguably the biggest story of the last few month broke Carlson spent less than a minute discussing a issue tangentally tied to it.


You guys can't even admit that based on actual video evidence. No wonder you keep doubling down on your support for an idiotic, corrupt Cheeto
Do you really care what Tucker Carlson does? He's a hack. You ball parked all of Fox News because of what Tucker did. Fox, as a whole, covered it extensively all day long.
 

Sapidus

Well-Known Member
Do you really care what Tucker Carlson does? He's a hack. You ball parked all of Fox News because of what Tucker did. Fox, as a whole, covered it extensively all day long.
My point was when the news was breaking a Trump supporter who has a large influence was not covering it. In fact he was purposely trying to belittle it by making fun of CNN for braking into regular programming.

It goes to show how partisan Carlson is

Leading people like Viral to think it is not worth knowing about and not important while many sane pundits are saying it is of Watergate like importance in what it could mean for Trumps presidency.


I personally think he is a partisan hack but that doesn’t mean he doesn’t have a big influence on some people and is complicit in keeping people uninformed.
 

OmyGawd

Member
Has anyone been able to keep track of all the crap that is being spewed out here by Sappy? I think we need a scorecard to keep track of the bovine defecation here.
 

littlelady

God bless the USA
Has anyone been able to keep track of all the crap that is being spewed out here by Sappy? I think we need a scorecard to keep track of the bovine defecation here.
No need to keep track. It is the same ole, same ole leap frog defecation in every post Sap makes. Liberals have lost their minds. It was bad enough before Trump came on the scene. The swamp waters are churning for a reason. God bless the USA.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
It goes to show how partisan Carlson is
Whoever said he wasn't? It's his show. He can say what he wants.

Leading people like Viral to think it is not worth knowing about and not important while many sane pundits are saying it is of Watergate like importance in what it could mean for Trumps presidency.
No - it's not. At least with Watergate, you had an identifiable *crime*. And Nixon was out in a year and a half with substantial verifiable clear evidence of guilt.
This collusion crap is going nowhere, but won't end because the Democrats are in too deep - they are compelled to continue their snipe hunt,
because they'll look stupid if they don't.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
My point was when the news was breaking a Trump supporter who has a large influence was not covering it. In fact he was purposely trying to belittle it by making fun of CNN for braking into regular programming.

It goes to show how partisan Carlson is

Leading people like Viral to think it is not worth knowing about and not important while many sane pundits are saying it is of Watergate like importance in what it could mean for Trumps presidency.


I personally think he is a partisan hack but that doesn’t mean he doesn’t have a big influence on some people and is complicit in keeping people uninformed.
I don't think anyone would disagree that Tucker is a right wing partisan. I would not go as far as saying he dishonest. He just chose, on his show, not to cover the Cohen story. But your title stated that it's Fox News. Tucker is but one hour out of 24 of that network. Fox covered that story all day.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
No - it's not. At least with Watergate, you had an identifiable *crime*. And Nixon was out in a year and a half with substantial verifiable clear evidence of guilt.
This collusion crap is going nowhere, but won't end because the Democrats are in too deep - they are compelled to continue their snipe hunt,
because they'll look stupid if they don't.
They look stupid doing this. But, we're remiss in ignoring that a lot of republicans are in on this collusion crap too. It was Grassley that said: "it would be suicide for the president to fire Mueller". Really? You mean to tell me that if the president exercised this authority by firing Mueller that they would impeach him? McCain said: "It’s critical he be allowed to complete a thorough investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election — unimpeded”.

I say let this thing play out. Then when the thing is dropped and Trump is still president, he should do what he does best - make every one of these never-Trumpers look like the fools they are. My concern about this though, is that Mueller is going to stay in this until they can dredge up something. The goal is to get Trump out of the White House at any cost.
 

Rommey

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
I don't think anyone would disagree that Tucker is a right wing partisan. I would not go as far as saying he dishonest. He just chose, on his show, not to cover the Cohen story. But your title stated that it's Fox News. Tucker is but one hour out of 24 of that network. Fox covered that story all day.
...and how many minutes (or would it be how many seconds?) of his show was devoted to the panda story?
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
My point was when the news was breaking a Trump supporter who has a large influence was not covering it. In fact he was purposely trying to belittle it by making fun of CNN for braking into regular programming.

It goes to show how partisan Carlson is

Leading people like Viral to think it is not worth knowing about and not important while many sane pundits are saying it is of Watergate like importance in what it could mean for Trumps presidency.


I personally think he is a partisan hack but that doesn’t mean he doesn’t have a big influence on some people and is complicit in keeping people uninformed.
I posted the video of this panda report. His story was only 45 seconds long and it was at the end of the show.

Now do you really want to talk about uninformed? You took a meme and ran with it, rather than fact check it. Can you provide any specific examples of where Tucker has misinformed his audience?

For the record:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Br9-YofVBWM&t=7s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_oI2cYi480

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-0thpqei1o&t=2s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05M5dHdmDgk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dj2jwhg1_-I

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rG1jxInrU9M

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmNlvWeSVsw&t=3s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-5f1xU2UZ8

Do you need more convincing that Fox covered the story?
 
Top