Gay Marriage - Next MAP's Furies and Trans Queers

GURPS

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member






Here's some of what Cowan wrote:

Can Democrats remain supportive of a small and vulnerable segment of the population without seeming out of touch with much of America? Is there a middle ground they can occupy on issues relating to transgender people and still find their way out of the political wilderness? I believe the answer to these questions is yes.
Click to expand...

It is not yes. The segment of trans individuals is small, but it is not vulnerable. The trans community is the only one that can demand access to women's spaces, including in prisons, and force people to call them different pronouns under the threat of losing their jobs and -- in some places -- hate speech laws.

In Maine, Republican representative Laurel Libby was banned by the Maine Speaker of the House from talking on the floor and voting for refusing to recant her position on 'trans girls' (read: boys) in girls' sports. The Supreme Court later ruled 7-2 to restore Libby's rights as a state legislator.





RemovePaywall | Free online paywall remover

Remove Paywall, free online paywall remover. Get access to articles without having to pay or login. Works on Bloomberg and hundreds more.
www.removepaywall.com www.removepaywall.com
 
Sneakers

Sneakers

Just sneakin' around....
PREMO Member
They walk around just waiting to be offended, looking for it, maybe even instigating. "Normies" aren't safe in their world anymore.
 
LightRoasted

LightRoasted

If I may ...
For your consideration ...


Sneakers said:
They walk around just waiting to be offended, looking for it, maybe even instigating. "Normies" aren't safe in their world anymore.
Click to expand...


Ever wonder what happens when a "normie" is backed into a corner? I'd say it's the fogots that aren't safe if they continue to push it in people's faces.

1748822032924.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top