Yooper
Up. Identified. Lase. Fire. On the way.
The link is to a very long and dense SCIENTIFIC article that speaks to how courts/juries are getting the Round-Up story absolutely wrong.
BLUF: Round-Up is FAR, FAR less toxic than what you may be seeing on TV, hearing on the radio, etc. (from those ambulance chaser ads).
My take: what is happening in the courts (where juries are awarding damages for Round-Up use) are hurting both the legal system and the scientific method. Lawyers, activists, etc. are misusing data/statistics to win awards from juries who are more interested in the story than the science.
Anyway, for many (most?) the article will be in the TL;DR category, but it's an important piece. So posting it as a resource for those interested in the subject.
Link: http://fafdl.org/blog/2017/04/13/glyphosate-vs-caffeine-acute-and-chronic-toxicity-assessments-explained/
Saw a post about this on AoS (good in and of itself) and followed the link. Glad I did.
--- End of line (MCP)
BLUF: Round-Up is FAR, FAR less toxic than what you may be seeing on TV, hearing on the radio, etc. (from those ambulance chaser ads).
My take: what is happening in the courts (where juries are awarding damages for Round-Up use) are hurting both the legal system and the scientific method. Lawyers, activists, etc. are misusing data/statistics to win awards from juries who are more interested in the story than the science.
Anyway, for many (most?) the article will be in the TL;DR category, but it's an important piece. So posting it as a resource for those interested in the subject.
Link: http://fafdl.org/blog/2017/04/13/glyphosate-vs-caffeine-acute-and-chronic-toxicity-assessments-explained/
Saw a post about this on AoS (good in and of itself) and followed the link. Glad I did.
--- End of line (MCP)