he had been there what, 7 years, and the best they could do was a 40 year old shaq. sure, climbing a bigger mountain could have been more epic, but winning more titles and dominating the league is what people will look at. in 20 years, if he keeps this up, 99.9% of the population will remember him as a top player...and you and cleveland fans will say he should have stayed with a crap owner/team and somehow carried them to a championship. he gave them 7 good years and even resigned after his rookie contract to give them more chances to put talent around him. they failed, not lebron. if he had stayed and they kept failing to add talent, who knows where he would be now. he has learned a lot from wade, bosh, and allen. plus, 10 years with no talent around somebody can kill motivation. maybe he wouldnt have improved as much. im glad he has the chance to maximize his talent.
oh and so much for giving lebron his due...more empty words. why bother posting something if youre full of ####? he dominated games 6 & 7, won mvp, and carried a team to a title. wade was injured and bosh was ineffective against duncan (im not buying the ankle injury) so im curious if "adding a bosh" is the only difference, he arguably had less than that in the last 2 rounds, but still you are unhappy. the spurs clearly had more overall talent...green dominated the arc, leonard is an all around beast, the spurs own big 3 is pretty good, and even neal and diaw dominated in spots. it seems as if you merely wanted what you wanted and nothing else would appease you. maybe youre a closet cleveland fan after all
