Guess who ---

[Ken King]

What do we have here, Maynard G. Hussein? You want a one on one debate. Might as well televise it and get Dan Rather to moderate it too.

 

[demsformd]

Re: OK

Originally posted by MGKrebs
Here's the problem. I really want to respond, but there are about 10 posts that I need to respond to, and every time I post there will be 10 more. I just can't respond to everything like this. So...

Anybody up for a challenge? I challenge anyone here to a one-on-on thread about the war. The first post would be asking everyone else to refrain from posting so we can sorta control the debate. The second post would be the "first shot across the bow" so to speak. Heck, there could even be a parallel thread for other comments or "blow by blow" analysis.

Is this feasible? Or should I just concentrate on responding to one person and ignore the others?

Anybody got game?

I think that you and me should do it since I am a liberal and am now a cautious supporter of the war and President Bush on this one. I think that arguments from me would be more beneficial for you then any of the conservatives here.

 

[MGKrebs]

I like it.

You and i should be able to have a civilized debate.

"One On One" Coming right up!