Gun Confiscations Underway

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
As a matter of fact I do know. You can spout that bullsh*t but you and I know that it is exactly that. Bullsh*t. You say I'll never know...lol. I already do. Now you and I both know your a lying ass.

::1bdz: Whatever keeps you awake.:buddies:


Still be interesting to find out why MSP confiscated that families firearms though...doncha think?
 

nutz

Well-Known Member
why MSP confiscated that families firearms though...

Confiscation in this context seems very out of place. Simply put, confiscation is a legal taking of goods and assets. From what you've reported, this family appears to have voluntarily surrendered their firearms. :popcorn:
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
From what you've reported, this family appears to have voluntarily surrendered their firearms. :popcorn:

Do they have a choice? Did they have a choice? What happens when the MSP shows up to confiscate your firearms and you refuse to let them go?
 

dontknowwhy

New Member
As a matter of fact, no. Maybe this bunch of LE friends of yours are as reliable as the anonymous letter writer to you and they both are equally credible. :killingme

Before I call you a liar, I'll ask the ones I know (including a former sheriff) who retired from the SMC sheriff's office how many years they put in.
Then I'll ask the ones with 20+ yrs in (including a current sheriff) how much longer they expect to work before retiring...

And Gilligan, without links, local newspaper stories, or non stop coverage on CNN, you are clearly lying about this... :sarcasm:

But then again, there's no stories for proof when this happened to my buddy in Calvert 2 mos. ago either. They were looking for his daughter's boyfriend whom he put out a few mos. prior for being an all around loser. The cops came looking for this boy, were told he was put out a few months earlier, then they switched to inquiring about my friend's firearms; all of which was on a list that the MSP showed up with...

And you won't find any news stories about it because WHY would the police report that they are doing this?
 

nutz

Well-Known Member
Do they have a choice? Did they have a choice? What happens when the MSP shows up to confiscate your firearms and you refuse to let them go?

Again
From what you've reported,
I would have to say yes. According to your side, there was not a search warrant involved. Without a search warrant, how was a legal confiscation committed? How did the police/sheriff/deputy gain access to the house? What was the excuse used to search for weapons? Why didn't the homeowner tell them to pack sand, contact an attorney and await a search warrant?

From what has been written on this site, I can only conclude these people allowed the police/sheriff/deputy into their home/business and then voluntarily disclosed the location of their weapons for seizure. I keep my guns in separate locations, don't you? The registered in one safe, the extras away from those.......:coffee:
 
Last edited:

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
Again I would have to say yes. According to your side, there was not a search warrant involved. Without a search warrant, how was a legal confiscation committed? How did the police/sheriff/deputy gain access to the house? What was the excuse used to search for weapons? Why didn't the homeowner tell them to pack sand, contact an attorney and await a search warrant?

From what has been written on this site, I can only conclude these people allowed the police/sheriff/deputy into their home/business and then voluntarily disclosed the location of their weapons for seizure. I keep my guns in separate locations, don't you? The registered in one safe, the extras away from those.......:coffee:

They were advised that, should they demand a search warrant, the MSP troopers would get one within a very short timeframe and that at least some of them would remain there waiting until a warrant was obtained.

On the rest..I guess you didn't read it. The four troopers were dispatched to that home to remove the owner's firearms after a "disapproved" came through on a recent purchase, reportedly made around September of last year. (Says something about how far behind the background check process still is too...but I digress).

The whole issue here is not the confiscation..the MSP can and will do that of course, if anyone's background check results in a disapproval and they've taken possession of their firearm. As so very many have. The four MSP troopers were simply executing routine orders. The issue here is that the family has no idea what actually triggered the disapproval. And they are spending some serious coin in legal fees trying to find out...and get their firearms returned.
 
Last edited:

itsrequired

New Member
They were advised that, should they demand a search warrant, the MSP troopers would get one within a very short timeframe and that at least some of them would remain there waiting until a warrant was obtained.

On the rest..I guess you didn't read it. The four troopers were dispatched to that home to remove the owner's firearms after a "disapproved" came through on a recent purchase, reportedly made around September of last year.

The four MSP troopers were simply executing routine orders. The issue here is that the family has no idea what actually triggered the disapproval. And they are spending some serious coin in legal fees trying to find out...and get their firearms returned.

Boy for someone who is concerned about his alleged friends privacy, you sure do share a lot. :coffee:
 

nutz

Well-Known Member
The issue here is that the family has no idea what actually triggered the disapproval. And they are spending some serious coin in legal fees trying to find out...and get their firearms returned.
Ahh, ok thanks for clearing it up for me. :buddies:
 

BigBlue

New Member
So this thread was started 3wks ago as of Wednesday and not one word or mention from anywhere but Gilligan ,just sayin .:whistle:



How are those updates coming ???:killingme:killingme:howdy:
 
Top