head on GMR

glhs837

glhs837

Power with Control
So, SUV (Trailblazer?) heading eastbound, small blue car (Neon) westbound, looks like Neon crossed center lane going at least full speed.......
 
BadGirl

BadGirl

I am so very blessed
kwillia said:
He critiques your shopping lists for spelling errors before you can leave to go shopping, doesn't he? :ohwell:
Click to expand...

Nope.

No lie, I am very meticulous about my shopping lists. They are on an Excel spreadsheet, catalogued by aisles in the store where I can find everything.

I can zip in and out of the grocery store pretty quickly because I am so methodical about my lists.
 
SoMDGirl42

SoMDGirl42

Well-Known Member
glhs837 said:
So, SUV (Trailblazer?) heading eastbound, small blue car (Neon) westbound, looks like Neon crossed center lane going at least full speed.......
Click to expand...

full speed in that area I believe is 30 mph. I say so! Those cars are demolished.

Hope everyone is ok.
 
Danzig

Danzig

Well-Known Member
I was the second accident, the one in front of McDonald's
I was NOT at fault, NOT speeding, and had all my windows cleaned off.
Some lady avoiding the first accident decided to make a U-turn and didn't look to her left before hitting me.
 
SoMDGirl42

SoMDGirl42

Well-Known Member
Danzig said:
I was the second accident, the one in front of McDonald's
I was NOT at fault, NOT speeding, and had all my windows cleaned off.
Some lady avoiding the first accident decided to make a U-turn and didn't look to her left before hitting me.
Click to expand...

:huggy:

Glad you're ok. I'd have stomped on your chest and blown in your face if you required CPR, only cause I like you. :love:

I really am glad you are ok though.

Any updates on the other accident?
 
itsbob

itsbob

I bowl overhand
glhs837 said:
I think 35, but not sure, but even at 30mph, head on is the same as hitting a still object at 60mph.
Click to expand...

Actually not..

The damage from a head on collision of two cars traveling 30 MPH is the same as ONE car hitting a wall at 30 MPH.. or 50.. or 60..

There is no increase in damage because there are two cars v one car and a wall..
 
MMDad

MMDad

Lem Putt
itsbob said:
Actually not..

The damage from a head on collision of two cars traveling 30 MPH is the same as ONE car hitting a wall at 30 MPH.. or 50.. or 60..

There is no increase in damage because there are two cars v one car and a wall..
Click to expand...

Yep. As long as the cars are similarly sized. If you hit a snow plow head on, you will absorb almost all of the force, which makes the forces add.
 
sockgirl77

sockgirl77

Well-Known Member
itsbob said:
I edited my original post and quoted their sentence.

The very next sentence in the article is even worse but there was no play on words, just REALLY bad grammar.
Click to expand...

Two people were transported from the scene. One of the patients was transported by ambulance to an area trauma center. :yay:
 
SoMDGirl42

SoMDGirl42

Well-Known Member
itsbob said:
I edited my original post and quoted their sentence.

The very next sentence in the article is even worse but there was no play on words, just REALLY bad grammar.
Click to expand...

Question for you.

Since you used "is" present tense first, shouldn't you use "is" present tense second instead of "was" which is past tense?

Serious question here.

The very next sentence in the article was even worse but there was no play on words, just REALLY bad grammar

or

The very next sentence in the article is even worse but there is no play on words, just REALLY bad grammar
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top