Here's what happens with your Castle Doctrine

R

RadioPatrol

Guest
careful, now days that talk will land you in jail as a terrorist ........... :whistle:
 
M

Mateo

New Member
This is great .
I don't know how many of you remember the case , I think it was in Texas, where a burglar was engaged in his "craft" was injured in the commiission of said "craft" and successfully sued the homeowner for "cruel and unusual harm" in placing "preventative devices" on his property to protect said possessions from such "craftsmen (or to be PC"craftspersons").
I like this method a whole lot better.
Kudos to the neighbor....I wish that all our neighbors, including ourselves, would be just as vigilant.
 
Bann

Bann

Doris Day meets Lady Gaga
PREMO Member
Larry Gude said:
...well and good to discuss but it is a side issue to this;



It doesn't say 'the right of the members of the militia'.

It doesn't say 'the right of the state.'

It says the people. The people have the right to keep and bare arms and we have the right to overthrow the government which in and of itself removes any concern over who regulates the militia as it CAN'T be the government as the government isn't going to over throw itself.

It is us. It is our militia.

We, the people.
Click to expand...


:yay:
 
Bann

Bann

Doris Day meets Lady Gaga
PREMO Member
This_person said:
You mean, the people have the right to overthrow the government? Like, whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness? You really think the people who wrote: "But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security" might have been thinking about the government they were forming, and whether it, too, might someday need be overthrown?

That's crazy, man! :lol:
Click to expand...

:yeahthat:
 
Bann

Bann

Doris Day meets Lady Gaga
PREMO Member
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.


The Declaration of Independence
 
Pete

Pete

Repete
forestal said:
Anyway, all this argument may be moot. The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means, no matter what the original intent was.

Am looking forward to the outcome of the Supreme Court's decision to review DC's right to keep handguns out of its residents hands.
Click to expand...

So how do you like the Supreme Court now?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top