He had a point.Lol calm down Thanos
He had a point.Lol calm down Thanos
So it’s a coincidence he was diagnosed 12 days after the rally?
Show the proof, because I call your BS...
ummm, I think that's what's called ANECDOTAL!! Not even close to being proof.Among 139 clients exposed to two symptomatic hair stylists with confirmed COVID-19 while both the stylists and the clients wore face masks, no symptomatic secondary cases were reported; among 67 clients tested for SARS-CoV-2, all test results were negative. Adherence to the community’s and company’s face-covering policy likely mitigated spread of SARS-CoV-2.
Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists...
On May 12, 2020 (day 0), a hair stylist at salon A in Springfield, Missouri (stylist A), developed respiratory symptoms and continued working with clients until day 8, when the stylist received a...www.cdc.gov
Same with my son, the Firefighter/EMS. One of the bunkmates had it, the rest of them texted negative. AND continue to test negative.ummm, I think that's what's called ANECDOTAL!! Not even close to being proof.
Were there any positives?? Were there any cases where neither wore masks and they were the only positive.. any case where only one was wearing a mask and they tested positive??
Because I can tell you personally that I had close contact with a Positive COVID over a good length of time (measured in hours).. NOBODY wore masks, and not one of us has had symptoms or tested positive.. so using your argument, 100% of people not wearing masks is 100% safe.
ummm, I think that's what's called ANECDOTAL!! Not even close to being proof.
Were there any positives?? Were there any cases where neither wore masks and they were the only positive.. any case where only one was wearing a mask and they tested positive??
Because I can tell you personally that I had close contact with a Positive COVID over a good length of time (measured in hours).. NOBODY wore masks, and not one of us has had symptoms or tested positive.. so using your argument, 100% of people not wearing masks is 100% safe.
Where the surge in Tulsa was directly linked to the rally.
8 people in Trumps entourage not 8 people total liar
Not really. He had advanced cancer, but since he also tested positive for the virus they say he died of COVID.
Fantasy, Supposition, Innuendo and OPINION
Tulsa health official says Trump rally "likely contributed" to spike in coronavirus cases
' likely contributed ' ... NOT exactly Firm Attribution as to cause and affect ..... where is the contact tracing where are the reports WE Know X Number of people infected were at the Trump Rally
Anything Else is FANTASY Conjecture on YOUR Part.
NO Lies ...... Did you MISS the Question Mark
So it’s a coincidence he was diagnosed 12 days after the rally?
even so. We know he was in a high risk group.
We know how to prevent it.
Only Trumps misinformation and Cains Hubris is to blame.
how many anti mask idiots have to die before you guys realize a piece of cloth is not oppression. It’s protection.
We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.
Wrong. It has been shown that reaching herd immunity will certainly kill many times more people and no one is suggesting that.
They tried it in Britain and Sweden and are paying for it now
even if it gave you 35% protection wouldn’t that put weight the minor inconvenience of wearing one?
Can YOU Prove Cain was Exposed to The Chinese Bat Soup Flu @ Tulsa
Yes He was.
No, No You don't ..... it is conjecture and OPINION .. it has been widely reported MOST of the infections came from people living in the same household
Just because YOU Believe it, and Say Something, That Does NOT Make It True or Everyone Will Have The SAME Opinion
DIY FACE MASKS ARE BASICALLY USELESS AGAINST THE CORONAVIRUS
Studies have confirmed the fact that homemade cloth masks are pretty terrible at catching viruses. A 2013 Cambridge University study found that tea towels and vacuum cleaner bags were far closer to the effectiveness of actual surgical masks in blocking a certain type of virus.
And then there’s the fact that people might think their cloth face masks can do more than they actually can — in fact, a false sense of security could actually do more harm than good. By touching a contaminated surface and then the mask could actually end up with you getting infected yourself. Besides, homemade masks aren’t properly sterilized.
Surgical and Cloth Masks are Useless Against COVID-19, Says New Study
Both the cotton and surgical masks are ineffective for filtering the SAD-CoV-2 and don’t prevent the dissemination of virus from the sneeze or cough of patients suffering from COVID-19. The study was conducted at two hospitals in South Korea and Seoul, which demonstrated that face masks are ineffective as virus droplets release to the external mask surface and the environment when patients coughed into either type of face mask.
The findings of the research report are published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.
Face masks are thought to prevent virus transmission during respiratory viral infections, leading healthcare professionals to recommend the use of masks during coronavirus pandemic. With the shortage of N95 and surgical face masks, which thought to prevent the virus spread, cotton masks are now used as a substitute. But it is not confirmed if these masks are worn by COVID-19 patients actually prevent the transmission of the virus to the environment.
COVID-19 – Your Mask Is Useless, and You’re Using it Wrong
Disclaimer: the information contained within this article was gathered from the following sources:
Now, if you paid attention to the words I used so far, you’ll have noticed that I’m only mentioning surgical masks. You know, those cheap masks, usually blue or green, that you see everywhere in Hong Kong. Well, those masks are useless against 2019-nCoV. And for three reasons.
- Centre for Health Protection (CHP; Hong Kong-English)
- National Centre for Infectious Diseases (NCID; Singapore)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC; United States)
- Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC-ASPC; Canada-English)
- Agence de la santé publique du Canada (PHAC-ASPC; Canada-French)
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC; Europe)
- Santé publique France (SpF, France)
- National Health Service (NHS; United Kingdom)
- World Health Organisation (WHO, Global)
First off, surgical masks are loose-fitting. Try as you might, you will never obtain a perfect seal around your mouth and nose with a surgical mask. This allows smaller airborne droplets, which may -or may not- carry viruses, to find their way through gaps between the mask and you skin, and into your respiratory system, hence infecting you even though you are wearing a surgical mask.
As a matter of fact, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicates that the surgical mask “(d)oes NOT provide the wearer with a reliable level of protection from inhaling smaller airborne particles and is not considered respiratory protection”[1].
One could argue, though, that surgical masks may be useful in case an infected person coughs directly in your face. Although incredibly rude, it happens (this is Hong Kong, after all). And in such case, a surgical mask may offer some protection against splashes of fluids and larger droplets.
However, one must bear in mind the mode of transmission of coronaviruses. And 2019-nCoV, as most human coronaviruses, spreads from an infected person to another through the air (coughing or sneezing), through fecal contamination (albeit rarely), or through contact (direct or indirect) between a contaminated surface and your mouth, nose, or eyes. Yes, you could also get infected with 2019-nCoV through the eyes.
Now, let’s bring back that infected person coughing directly in your face. In such a scenario, wearing a surgical mask would help prevent contamination directly through the respiratory system. It wouldn’t protect you from a contamination through the eyes, though.
The Science Turns Against America’s Mask Fascists
No less than the New England Journal of Medicine has dealt a body blow to America’s growing army of mask fascists with the news that “wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.”
The reasons for this are both simple and logical:
Cloth Masks Are Useless Against COVID-19
The idea that cloth masks will protect anybody from contracting COVID-19 is magical thinking, Lisa Brousseau, ScD, expert on infectious diseases, Professor (retired), University of Illinois at Chicago, tells Infection Control Today.
Adherence to the community’s and company’s face-covering policy likely mitigated spread of SARS-CoV-2.
You are stunningly stupid.
Says the person who posts disinformation, half truths and lies all day for no apparent reason.
Why do you keep denying what is obvious?
Do you like to see Americans killed?
Why is "likely contributed" enough for you to continue to deny science and common sense?
Look what Trump has done to you and how far you have to sink to defend the indefensible.
If i told you 4 years ago you would be denying a pandemic
and defending a doctor who thinks spirits and magic cause illness and gynecological problems you would have said "that's silly" No Way".
You're so full of $#!^.Says the person who posts disinformation, half truths and lies all day for no apparent reason.
Seems like you must have recently learned that word Ad hominem since you use it like its running out.