Homosexuals allowed to raise children.....

[This_person]

I said he's a bigot. It's the blatant truth. :shrug:

No, I'm not acting bigotted.

It could certainly be viewed acting in a hateful manner, because of someone's belief. That's all I'm saying.

 

[AndyMarquisLIVE]

It could certainly be viewed acting in a hateful manner, because of someone's belief. That's all I'm saying.

Okay, I get it. You're someone else who can't mind their own business and wants to tell other people what rights they can and cannot have based on who their partner is.

 

[This_person]

To turn this in to a mudslinging name calling battle over who's right and who's wrong on the subject of homosexuality and all its parts does neither side any good whatsoever.

Big big big

I think homosexuals are great people, I think they're capable of raising the children that need a home (yes, homosexuals need heterosexuals to have children, however those heterosexuals who cannot raise their child and give them up for adoption should thank the homosexuals for taking them in), capable of staying in committed relationships, holding great jobs, and remaining drug and alcohol free, should they choose. I think that the only difference between a heterosexual person and a homosexual person is whom they sleep with.

Change "are great people" to "can be great people, just like heterosexuals", and you've got it right on, IMO. We can view homosexuality differently, but a single issue such as this does not change the overall humanity of homosexuals. Certainly, there are bad people who are homosexual, just as there are bad people who are heterosexual. I don't personally condone homosexuality as an action, certainly not when it's a lifestyle choice (vice a genetic issue), but I don't condone a lot of things people do (and, I'm one of those people with faults :lol).

Let it go, man... just find a new subject to argue ad nauseum about.

 

[This_person]

Okay, I get it. You're someone else who can't mind their own business and wants to tell other people what rights they can and cannot have based on who their partner is.

Not at all. I'm just saying that, by attacking another, you're acting in the way you claim they are (attacking for beliefs).