A wonderful quote from a DU member.. God help the community that harbors such a sharp knife. <table class="post-message" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="10" width="100%"> <tbody><tr valign="top"> <td width="1%">
</td> <td width="99%"> This has to be a rePunk plant to make Dems look bad. It just has to...
</td></tr></tbody> </table>
Would you vote for someone that included this in his platform?kom526 said:What is the title of the thread?
General Discussion: Politicskom526 said:Got the thread, now which topic is it listed under. Christ, they like to![]()
![]()
over there.
kom526 said:Thanks for the info. It's good to know that they have the same opinion of him as we do.
I thnik your linkie there may just be for another thread??:shrug:appyday said:
Merlin said:I thnik your linkie there may just be for another thread??:shrug:
bcp said:General Discussion: Politics
JPCs brother is there now.
suggesting that people with children pay a mandatory percentage of their pay to a pool that will support the children of the deadbeats.
where do these people come from?
JPC said:Well I looked under that link and I can not find anything.
![]()
cause I spray painted the entrance to camy it.....JPC said:Well I looked under that link and I can not find anything.
![]()
bcp said:cause I spray painted the entrance to camy it.....
seriously.
go to the WWW.democraticunderground.com
then go to General discussions: politics
then find the thread would you vote for.....
right now the thread is only like 5 deep in the page.
and there does seem to be someone there that "almost" agrees with you.
they think that everyone should be forced to pay a percentage of their pay into a "pool" that will go to pay support for children.
JPC said:Well you failed to put my website there for them to see first hand so they are only responding to your dribble.
Start a new thread and give the whole story, or give it up.![]()
as far as the dribble, I have only cut and pasted words from these threads.Edit after reading his website now:
I probably wouldn't vote for him, but not because of the child support stance, which I don't believe was properly represented in the OP. I couldn't find any specific stances on the issues I disagree with (pro-choice, pro-environment, anti-slave to big business and unnecessary military buildup). The quality of the writing on the website, however, is unprofessional and badly in need of editing and proofreading. He comes off as less educated and intelligent than the ideal candidate, as a result of the writing style. The maxim section in particular rambles without making a clear point, and ought to be deleted, or at least boiled down to three or four statements. I wouldn't want an official to represent me if they can't stay on topic and focused while debating an issue - an official campaign website isn't the place for stream of conciousness rants. Likewise, the bio, obviously, should summarize his child support issues concisely, and should be a small part of his bio. I would hope his identity doesn't entirely revolve around an inability to pay child support.
AP clarifies story about Katrina, Bush
WASHINGTON — In a Wednesday story, The Associated Press reported that federal disaster officials warned President Bush and his Homeland Security chief before Hurricane Katrina struck that the storm could breach levees in New Orleans, citing confidential video footage of an Aug. 28 briefing.
The Army Corps of Engineers considers a breach a hole developing in a levee rather than an overrun. The story should have made clear that Bush was warned about floodwaters overrunning the levees, rather than the levees breaking.
The day before Katrina, Bush was told there were grave concerns the levees could be overrun.
It wasn’t until the next morning, as the storm made landfall, that Michael Brown, then head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, said Bush had asked about reports of breaches. Bush did not participate in that briefing.