SamSpade said:
What does get me however, is that nothing I've read convinces me there's any *efficient* and pollution-free way of *producing* usable hydrogen. It burns cleanly enough, but it uses fuel, to make fuel. It's like telling yourself that re-chargeable batteries are "free". The hell they are - they use electricity, and they *waste* as much energy as they consume. They're just damned convenient. But there's no net "savings".
This is true but yet incomplete.
While hydrogen fuel is not as pollution free as many seem to think, the advantage is that the pollution is concentrated at a few localized facilities versus spewing from every tailpipe across the nation. This allows for much easier control and mitigation of the pollution. It is much easier to monitor and apply control methods to a few dozen power plants then to a few million automobiles.
And the same applies to rechargeable batteries. 100 million batteries headed for landfills, which will be covered and forgot about in a couple years until the runoff starts leaching into our drinking water. Or a few power plants which are constantly monitored and can have new pollution control technology applied as it comes available.
The savings is that, by reducing the number of pollution sources, you are reducing the effort that goes into detecting and minimizing the amount of pollution.