Inflation Reduction And Climate Change Act That Isn't

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
The IRA, you see, contains a “Methane Emissions Charge” that will impose a $900-a-ton tax on oil and gas producers that will increase to $1,500 after two years. The left is patting itself on the back for their valiant work to cut greenhouse gas emissions drastically by 2030. But here’s the thing: the energy industry is already working hard to cut emissions; it’s in their interest to do so. And when the government fines them for not capturing enough methane, guess who gets to foot the bill? Households already burdened by inflation.

“Methane that escapes during production or transportation is called fugitive or vented emissions,” Bernard L. Weinstein wrote at the Hill when the methane fee was introduced in the original Build Back Better bill last year. “These emissions have dropped remarkably sharply over the past decade. Why? Because energy companies have every incentive to capture methane, which is the principal component of natural gas. Those who put hard work and money into producing and transporting natural gas don’t want to lose any of it on the way to market.”

Long before BBB came along, market forces were at work, and methane emissions from natural gas extraction declined by 16 percent from 1990 to 2019. So in other words: the oil and gas industry is reducing methane emissions, and the Biden administration wants to take credit for it. And in the midst of an energy crisis, as suppliers scramble to meet demand, the government is adding mandates and punishments to the fraught industry, making the process of supplying energy to Americans all the more onerous.

“Why isn’t Big Oil up in arms about the climate-friendly Inflation Reduction Act?” wonders a headline at marketplace.org. The bill’s minimum tax rate isn’t a big deal to oil companies, the article says, because “a lot of the larger oil companies already pay taxes above that minimum,” and, as Weinstein noted, “they’ve been trying to limit methane leakage anyway.”


 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

IRS Hiring Spree Is the Biggest Expansion of the Police State in American History


The average American has less reason to be concerned about cops with guns — though the IRS is looking for special agents who can “carry a firearm and be willing to use deadly force, if necessary” — than they do bureaucrats armed with pens who are authorized to sift through their lives. If you pay your taxes you have nothing to worry about, Democrats claim. But most law-abiding citizens know they have something to fear from a state agency that doesn’t concern itself with your due process, has no regard for your privacy and is empowered to target anyone it wants without any genuine oversight.

And, please, spare us this nonsense about the IRS expansion focusing exclusively on “high earners.” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre promised that the IRS wouldn’t engage in new audits of anyone making under $400,000 — a claim she has no authority to make and could not possibly predict even if she did. Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy also said that the bill was passed to stop an “epidemic of tax cheating amongst the millionaires and billionaires” and promised that “audit rates won’t increase for anyone making under $400K.”

This is a lie. Nothing in the bill that Democrats passed through the Senate limits audits. Murphy, along with every other Democrat in the Senate, voted against a Republican amendment that would have prevented new agents from auditing individuals and small businesses with less than $400,000 of taxable income. Not long ago, Democrats passed the American Rescue Plan Act — which had as much to do with rescuing as the Inflation Reduction Act has to do with reducing inflation — and changed tax code so that mobile payment apps like Venmo and Cash App were now required to report transactions totaling $600 or more per year to the IRS. Does that sound like a party aiming fire exclusively at high-earning Americans?


Indeed, poor and middle-class Americans are far more likely to do their own taxes, and thus more prone to making mistakes. In 2021, those making $25,000 or less (often the young and elderly) were audited at a rate five times higher than everyone else. The wealthier you are the more likely it is that you can hire lawyers and accountants to work within the system. There aren’t enough millionaires and billionaires in the world to keep a potential new 87,000 IRS employees busy.
 

NextJen

Raisin cane
88BAE6D1-9267-41F1-9FB4-54FD544A3467.jpeg
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Inflation Reduction Act: Would New IRS Tax Enforcement Target the Middle Class?



Democrats’ Inflation Reduction Act aims to raise $200 billion over the next decade by helping the IRS increase tax enforcement and close loopholes. Will it work, and will it avoid targeting the middle class?

The IRS has long requested additional funds to modernize its outdated technology and add to its shrinking workforce; in April, IRS Commissioner Chuck Rettig said the 2022 tax season was “unlike any other” due to these challenges. Responding to these requests, the Inflation Reduction Act includes almost $80 billion for the IRS — potentially nearly doubling the average yearly IRS budget through 2031. Democrats say the increased tax enforcement will target big corporations and the wealthy, but a report released by House Republicans said it would result in over 700,000 more audits of people making less than $75,000 per year.

While the IRS said its increased enforcement would not target small businesses or the middle class, voices from the right were broadly skeptical, often pointing to a Treasury Department proposal to hire 87,000 IRS workers over the next decade. Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.) said the increased IRS enforcement would force “hardworking Americans” to “live in fear” of audits.

Perspectives from the left were less common and tended to defend the bill; an AP (Lean Left bias) fact check said Republicans were “distorting” the bill by making claims that were “not supported by what is in the legislation.”
 

stgislander

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
87000 additional agents just to audit big corporations and the wealthy. Seems a bit of overkill, but then quantity is a quality all its own.
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
I guess I better not claim the next routine 10,000 round ammo buy as tax deductible. Don't want to invite scrutiny.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Some of the lowlights will be a $250 billion slush fund for the Energy Department (think of Solyndra to the 100th power), $134 billion in tax credits for corporate welfare and Biden donors and $27 billion for a national climate bank. That's right, a national climate bank—as in an EPA slush fund.

Then, there's $7.5 billion in subsidies for new electric vehicles that typical families cannot afford and, by the way, most of the battery ingredients will disqualify even the cars for rich people because they're made in China and the radical greenies won't let resource-rich America mine these necessary minerals and, let’s not forget, $3 billion for so-called "climate justice" for the Biden wokesters, whatever "climate justice" is supposed to mean.

Then there's $12 billion in new taxes on fossil fuels, a $1,500-per-ton natural gas methane fee. All told, $93 billion in direct attacks on fossil fuels and energy independence.

Now, you would think that somebody in the federal government would want some kind of scorecard and environmental review to figure out whether this astronomical Green New Deal spending does any good or harm to the economy and the climate, but you would be wrong. There is no scoring.




 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act "Secretly" Brought To You By Bill Gates


The Democrats' "Inflation Reduction Act" - which according to the Congressional Budget Office will raise taxes on the middle class to the tune of $20 billion - not to mention unleash an army of IRS agents on working class Americans over the next decade, was made possible by Bill Gates and (in smaller part) Larry Summers, who have been known to hang out together.

The bill, of course, was signed yesterday.






In a Tuesday Bloomberg article that reads more like a newsletter for the Gates fan club, the billionaire Microsoft co-founder recalls how earlier this year, as moderate Democratic Senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema continued to block the tax-and-spend legislation over concerns that it would raise taxes on the middle class (it will), Gates says he tapped into a relationship with Manchin that he'd been cultivating since at least 2019.

Gates was banking on more than just his trademark optimism about addressing climate change and other seemingly intractable problems that have been his focus since stepping down as Microsoft’s chief executive two decades ago. As he revealed to Bloomberg Green, he has quietly lobbied Manchin and other senators, starting before President Joe Biden had won the White House, in anticipation of a rare moment in which heavy federal spending might be secured for the clean-energy transition.
Those discussions gave him reason to believe the senator from West Virginia would come through for the climate — and he was willing to continue pressing the case himself until the very end. “The last month people felt like, OK, we tried, we're done, it failed,” Gates said. “I believed it was a unique opportunity.” So he tapped into a relationship with Manchin that he’d cultivated for at least three years. “We were able to talk even at a time when he felt people weren’t listening.” -Bloomberg

We know, gag us with a spoon.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
The oil and gas industry news is still important, however. The AP makes a point of describing Joe Manchin as “a top recipient of oil and gas donations.” And he certainly has lived up to that description, but those donations paid off in this legislation. The block on the offering of new oil and gas exploration leases on vast tracts of public land, in the Gulf of Mexico, and off the shores of Alaska is being legislatively eliminated within thirty days.

As an added insurance policy, the language in that portion of the bill ties the green energy incentives that Biden and the Democrats sought to matching incentives for oil and gas exploration. If they want solar and wind on public lands, they “must offer new oil and gas leases first.” One energy analyst interviewed by the AP described it as a dawning realization by Democrats that they must “abandon the notion fossil fuels could soon be rendered obsolete.”

The oil and gas industry clearly saw this coming and they had been preparing. Despite the CEO of Chevron predicting earlier this year that no new oil refineries might ever be built in the United States again thanks to Joe Biden, we learned in recent weeks that Meridian Energy Group has received approval and is moving forward on construction of a new refinery in North Dakota. Two other previously shuttered refineries are undergoing refurbishment and will reopen later this year.

Don’t get me wrong, here. There are still plenty of awful things in this “climate bill.” But these additions lashing renewables and fossil fuels together have at least brought us a few significant steps closer to the “all of the above” energy policy that America needs to survive into the next century.


 

PeoplesElbow

Well-Known Member
Yes once hired they come under civil service rules and can't be fired.
Absolutely not true. Anyone within their first five years can be let go of easily. After 5 years it's more work but not too bad. I usually see one fired a year of just the people that I know.

It's often other rules and BS that make managers not want to do it. For example if someone is gotten rid of you can't hire a replacement because we are currently in a push for less people even though there isn't enough to handle the work there is. So a manager may want to hang onto them for now until that restriction is lifted.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Reporters blasted for abandoning Inflation Reduction Act title with bill signing: 'Aren't even trying anymore'







"The bill formerly known as the ‘Inflation Reduction Act,’" political consultant Brittany Cover joked.

The Heritage Foundation media director John Cooper tweeted, "Good on Kaitlan for calling this garbage bill what it actually is. Certainly has nothing to do with reducing inflation."

Reuters reported "Biden signs into law a $430 billion climate, healthcare and tax bill that is seen as the biggest climate package in U.S. history and designed to cut prescription drug."

Conservative writer Chad Felix Greene tweeted in response, "They just openly lie and nothing ever happens. Republicans do nothing. Politics is pointless."
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Texas cattle ranchers audited by IRS issue dire warning to Americans: 'They want to get you'



"We got audited over basically a $7,800 engine rebuild on a very old tractor," Deborah said.

"They just basically said this was a red flag, and we're going to audit you, and we're coming to your house," she added.

Hajda said she asked if she could fax her bank records to the IRS, but they refused to give her the option. Instead, they came to her house and demanded all of her financial records in-person.

"I took out our box of receipts… and we handed it to him, and I said ‘Here’s your receipts'… we weren't hiding anything," she said.

Perino asked if the IRS agent sought out the ranchers simply to fill a quota.

"Probably. They said they flagged it because our expenses were high that year, and it was because of this repair," David responded.

The Hajdas said, while they could not afford to replace the tractor, they kept all records of expenses for the necessary repairs. However, the auditor would not give up so easily.

"He wasn't satisfied. He kept digging, and he ended up nailing us. Our tax person was giving us 80% on our work vehicles, and he said you can only do 50%," David said.

"I was very naive about the situation. I had no idea of the power, the scope [of the audit] going in three years of my life… and me having no control over that, no control over the information he was given," Deborah said.

"It was very invasive. You feel very attacked because that guy wanted to go back and say, ‘I got her.’"
 
Top