Iran defies deadline to halt atom work!

[ylexot]

The U.N.'s nuclear watchdog said on Thursday Iran had failed to meet a February 21 deadline to suspend uranium enrichment, exposing Tehran to possible new sanctions over fears it hopes to produce an atomic bomb.

UN: Stop enriching uranium by X date, OR ELSE!
Iran: No.
UN: Stop enriching uranium by Y date, OR ELSE!
Iran: No.
UN: Stop enriching uranium by Z date, OR ELSE!
Iran: No.

 

[Pete]

ll_l

 

[SouthernMdRocks]

The U.N.'s nuclear watchdog said on Thursday Iran had failed to meet a February 21 deadline to suspend uranium enrichment, exposing Tehran to possible new sanctions over fears it hopes to produce an atomic bomb.

UN: Stop enriching uranium by X date, OR ELSE!
Iran: No.
UN: Stop enriching uranium by Y date, OR ELSE!
Iran: No.
UN: Stop enriching uranium by Z date, OR ELSE!
Iran: No.

And what will happen to them.... :shrug: nada..

 

[ylexot]

Reminds me of a scene from Demolition Man...

Squad Leader: Simon Phoenix! Lie down with your hands behind your back.
Simon Phoenix: What's this? Six of you. Such nice, tidy uniforms. Oh I'm so scared!
[the Police Officers look at each other]
Simon Phoenix: What you guys don't have sarcasm anymore?
[Police Officer talks to his automated assistant]
Squad Leader: Maniac has responded with a scornful remark.
automated assistant: Approach, and repeat ultimatum in an even firmer tone of voice. Add the words, "or else".

 

[PsyOps]

And what will happen to them.... :shrug: nada..

Another UNR but this time they will really mean it by saying "comply or face serious consequences".

 

[SouthernMdRocks]

Another UNR but this time they will really mean it by saying "comply or face serious consequences".

Oh yeah that, now that will really hold the flame to their britches!!

 

[2ndAmendment]

Another UNR but this time they will really mean it by saying "comply or face serious consequences".

And then the UN will pass another resolution and another and another and another and another and another and another and another and another and another until someone has the cojones to bomb them back into the beginning of time. It won't be the U.S. because the Islamocrats have control of the purse strings.

 

[chernmax]

Well it only took us about 11 years of Saddam defying UN resolutions for the UN/US to finally attach him, the way I see it, Iran still has about another 9 years before they should start worrying...

 

[2ndAmendment]

Well it only took us about 11 years of Saddam defying UN resolutions for the UN/US to finally attach him, the way I see it, Iran still has about another 9 years before they should start worrying...

Too late by then. They will be able to make mushroom clouds and that is not a good thing.

 

[PsyOps]

Too late by then. They will be able to make mushroom clouds and that is not a good thing.

Just remember the dems long-standing argument on Iraq: "Iraq was not an imminent threat to the US".

It has to be imminent and thousands have to die first.

 

[2ndAmendment]

I hope we are far enough from D.C. and up wind when the day comes. The day is coming.

 

[PsyOps]

I hope we are far enough from D.C. and up wind when the day comes. The day is coming.

I think Iran has Iraq and Israel in their sites.

 

[desertrat]

I think Iran has Iraq and Israel in their sites.

Exactly, the middle east first and then the rest of the world.

 

[PsyOps]

Exactly, the middle east first and then the rest of the world.

This is where what we are doing over there has to do with oil.

 

[vraiblonde]

I think Iran has Iraq and Israel in their sites.

I'd think they'd want to neutralize the US first, then take out Israel with no fear of repurcussion.

 

[Mikeinsmd]

I'd think they'd want to neutralize the US first, then take out Israel with no fear of repurcussion.

I told y'all we should just kill all muslims.

 

[PsyOps]

I'd think they'd want to neutralize the US first, then take out Israel with no fear of repurcussion.

To a certain degree (at least if the dems get their way) we have already been neutralized. Have you heard 9and I'm trying to find it) that the dems, since they couldn't pass their "non-binding resolution", are trying to draft up a bill to reverse the authority that gave Bush to go to war with Iraq?

 

[PsyOps]

Here it is...

Officials: Senate Democrats Seek to Narrow Mission of U.S. Troops in Iraq to Training, Fighting Al Qaeda

Senate Democrats are drafting legislation to scale back the mission of U.S. troops in Iraq in an effort that would reduce the broad war-making powers Congress granted to President Bush in 2002, officials said Thursday.

"We support the troops.....

While these officials said the precise wording of the measure remains unsettled, one draft would restrict American troops in Iraq to combating Al Qaeda, training Iraqi army and police forces, maintaining Iraq's territorial integrity and otherwise proceeding with the withdrawal of combat forces.

 

[desertrat]

I'd think they'd want to neutralize the US first, then take out Israel with no fear of repurcussion.

Neutralizing the US is next to impossible. They would have to take out all aircraft carriers and nuclear subs first or they would be evaporated.

 

[vraiblonde]

To a certain degree (at least if the dems get their way) we have already been neutralized. Have you heard 9and I'm trying to find it) that the dems, since they couldn't pass their "non-binding resolution", are trying to draft up a bill to reverse the authority that gave Bush to go to war with Iraq?

You know, I'd be curious what the US *would* do if Iran lobbed a nuke at Israel. I doubt Congress would authorize a response, and you know the UN isn't going to do anything about it.