Iran defies deadline to halt atom work!

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
desertrat said:
Neutralizing the US is next to impossible. They would have to take out all aircraft carriers and nuclear subs first or they would be evaporated.
All they'd really have to do is make a statement - take out the White House or something. Then Congress would be so frightened that they'd pretty much stay as far away from Iran's business as they possibly could.

Remember the Cold War and how much grief Reagan got for "stirring up" the Soviets and "escalating"?
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
vraiblonde said:
You know, I'd be curious what the US *would* do if Iran lobbed a nuke at Israel. I doubt Congress would authorize a response, and you know the UN isn't going to do anything about it.
You can't get much more neutral than that.
 
Last edited:

Toxick

Splat
vraiblonde said:
You know, I'd be curious what the US *would* do if Iran lobbed a nuke at Israel.


Well I guarantee that there would be an official condemnation against Iran - I can tell you that right now!


And I'll bet there will be SANCTIONS!
 

Mikeinsmd

New Member
Toxick said:
Well I guarantee that there would be an official condemnation against Iran - I can tell you that right now! And I'll bet there will be SANCTIONS!
And we could send inspectors and everything!!!
 

2ndAmendment

Just a forgiven sinner
PREMO Member
PsyOps said:
I think Iran has Iraq and Israel in their sites.
I think the Islamofacists have the U.S. in their sites and if Iran gets nukes, the terrorists will have them soon after.
 

AndyMarquisLIVE

New Member
vraiblonde said:
All they'd really have to do is make a statement - take out the White House or something. Then Congress would be so frightened that they'd pretty much stay as far away from Iran's business as they possibly could.

Remember the Cold War and how much grief Reagan got for "stirring up" the Soviets and "escalating"?
Scary thought is Iran (through Hizbollah) is more than capable of doing this.
 

2ndAmendment

Just a forgiven sinner
PREMO Member
Toxick said:
Well I guarantee that there would be an official condemnation against Iran - I can tell you that right now!


And I'll bet there will be SANCTIONS!
And the U.N. would pass a resolution saying they should not have done that and if they do it again, the U.N. will pass another resolution. :jameo:

The Islamocrats are doing their best to neuter the U.S. military.
 

AndyMarquisLIVE

New Member
2ndAmendment said:
And the U.N. would pass a resolution saying they should not have done that and if they do it again, the U.N. will pass another resolution. :jameo:

The Islamocrats are doing their best to neuter the U.S. military.
The U.N. ain't gonna do a thing about Iran and the Democrats need to wake up and realize this.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
2ndAmendment said:
I think the Islamofacists have the U.S. in their sites and if Iran gets nukes, the terrorists will have them soon after.
We already know that Iran is backing the insurgents in Iraq. So if Iran gets a nuclear program together, the US will almost HAVE to get out of Iraq. I'd be willing to bet that this was part of the plan all along.

In my opinion, if we end up in WWIII, it will be the UN's fault for not doing its job. But you watch Bush get the blame.
 

AndyMarquisLIVE

New Member
vraiblonde said:
We already know that Iran is backing the insurgents in Iraq. So if Iran gets a nuclear program together, the US will almost HAVE to get out of Iraq. I'd be willing to bet that this was part of the plan all along.

In my opinion, if we end up in WWIII, it will be the UN's fault for not doing its job. But you watch Bush get the blame.
I think they'll attack Israel first. I really almost think Iran is scared of us, as they should be. :wench:

I say we should just let Israel cut loose.
 

2ndAmendment

Just a forgiven sinner
PREMO Member
vraiblonde said:
We already know that Iran is backing the insurgents in Iraq. So if Iran gets a nuclear program together, the US will almost HAVE to get out of Iraq. I'd be willing to bet that this was part of the plan all along.

In my opinion, if we end up in WWIII, it will be the UN's fault for not doing its job. But you watch Bush get the blame.
We've already won WWIII, the cold war, thanks to Ronnie. This is WWIV and it will go on longer than the cold war in my opinion, two or three generations, unless the Islomocrats roll over, throw out the Constitution (which they ignore most of the time - so do the Republicans) and let the Islamic Imams rule the U.S. with Sharia.
 

2ndAmendment

Just a forgiven sinner
PREMO Member
AndyMarquisLIVE said:
I think they'll attack Israel first. I really almost think Iran is scared of us, as they should be. :wench:

I say we should just let Israel cut loose.
Let Israel cut loose, as in wipe Iran slick, or cut loose Israel? The latter will not happen, and that is a good thing in my opinion. The former might, but only through plausible deniability for the U.S. Biblically, Israel will survive since Israel exists when Christ returns.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
vraiblonde said:
We already know that Iran is backing the insurgents in Iraq. So if Iran gets a nuclear program together, the US will almost HAVE to get out of Iraq. I'd be willing to bet that this was part of the plan all along.

In my opinion, if we end up in WWIII, it will be the UN's fault for not doing its job. But you watch Bush get the blame.
Actually, if we do things the way we have in the past, once Iran starts posting their nuke-laden missiles we will position some of ours in Iraq.

If we don't act preemptively on Iran this could get very ugly. And you think things look bad in Iraq?
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
AndyMarquisLIVE said:
I think they'll attack Israel first. I really almost think Iran is scared of us, as they should be. :wench:

I say we should just let Israel cut loose.
Not only does Iran want Iraq, they need Iraq; for the resources, people (for recruitment) and wider expanse of land.
 

AndyMarquisLIVE

New Member
PsyOps said:
Actually, if we do things the way we have in the past, once Iran starts posting their nuke-laden missiles we will position some of ours in Iraq.

If we don't act preemptively on Iran this could get very ugly. And you think things look bad in Iraq?
Imagine 50,000 dead soldiers in one attack :shrug:

I agree we need to do something.
 

Toxick

Splat
PsyOps said:
If we don't act preemptively on Iran this could get very ugly.


:jameo: :jameo: :jameo:

ACK!

<IMG SRC="http://www.crews.org/curriculum/ex/compsci/webresources/animation/siren.gif">

You said the "P" Word.

<IMG SRC="http://www.crews.org/curriculum/ex/compsci/webresources/animation/siren.gif">

Here comes the pitchfork weilding mob!
LOOK OUT!!!


:jameo: :jameo: :jameo:
 

dustin

UAIOE
Personally I believe there is a greater threat from a dirty bomb than a your typical nuke missle or bomb.
 
Top