Iraq 'surge' may need 7,000 back-up troops

forestal

I'm the Boss of Me
Maybe we can get the Brits to come back, or maybe the Australians can loan us a few...

We need a draft to win this war now.


Iraq 'surge' may need 7,000 back-up troops

By Demetri Sevastopulo, Alim Remtulla and Edward Luce in,Washington

Published: March 7 2007 02:00 | Last updated: March 7 2007 02:00


US commanders in Iraq may need another 7,000 troops to support the military surge in Iraq, a senior Pentagon official told Congress on Tuesday.

Gordon England, the deputy defence secretary, said the troops would be necessary to support the 21,500 combat troops who are being sent to Iraq to help quell violence in Baghdad and al-Anbar province. Appearing before the House budget committee, Mr England rejected a recent estimate by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office that the surge would require an additional 15,000-28,000 support personnel.

"Our expectation is the number of support troops could go above 21,500 but about 4,000, maybe as many as 7,000, if the commanders on the ground request and they are all validated," said Mr England. "But it will be much lower, in my judgment, than what the CBO estimate is."

Mr England said the additional personnel would add about $1bn to the cost of the surge, which has already started in Baghdad.

The hearings coincided with one of the bloodiest days in Iraq in recent months: 112 Shia pilgrims were killed in sectarian suicide bombs and nine US soldiers died in separate attacks in Baghdad.

Almost 3,200 US soldiers have so far been killed in Iraq and more than 25,000 injured - most of them severely. Iraq Body Count, a group that monitors deaths of Iraqi civilians, estimates conservatively that as many as 63,573 Iraqis have died.
 

Lenny

Lovin' being Texican
ylexot said:
How does that translate into needing a draft? :confused:


It translates into anything the dipschmidt wants it to 'cause he can't reason for himself.
 

AndyMarquisLIVE

New Member
Lenny said:
It translates into anything the dipschmidt wants it to 'cause he can't reason for himself.
Then he'd complain about being drafted.

I take it forestool is under 17. If he was 17 or older, he wouldn't be wanting a draft...
 

MMDad

Lem Putt
Why do people keep responding to this idiot who just regurgitates anything he reads on the DU? Why do you keep feeding his feelings of self importance? Don't you understand that he only does this because the more responses he gets, the more important he feels?

Remember the slogan "What if there was a war and nobody showed up?"

Why not try "What if forestgeek posted and nobody replied?"
 

aps45819

24/7 Single Dad
guess who
 

Attachments

  • oneway.jpg
    oneway.jpg
    33.3 KB · Views: 67

FireBrand

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Let's all just try to remember one thing !
The best response to Forestal is no response at all !!
Silence is Golden !!!!!
Just let a bad fart linger..............
 
Top