Jack Smith - who is he?

Dakota

~~~~~~~
Seems like a made up name, huh?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Smith_(lawyer) :yawn:

His wife is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katy_Chevigny :eyebrow:


John Francis Moynihan (Consultant to the DEA) outlines an extortion racket set up by Jack Smith when he worked as a Prosecutor at The Hague. (see picture below)


Note: Chevigny's business partner is Dallas Brennan wonder if he is related to John Brennan in any way?


I am sure I'll be adding more to this later - few people are digging into him now and some other documents.
 

Attachments

  • smith - docWB.jpg
    smith - docWB.jpg
    274.7 KB · Views: 218

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Ex-Trump prosecutor Jack Smith under investigation by Office of Special Counsel after claims of playing politics: ‘No one is above the law’



The Office of Special Counsel has launched a formal investigation into Jack Smith, the first official legal probe into his conduct, The Post has learned.

Smith is the justice department lawyer who oversaw two criminal investigations into President Donald Trump during the Biden administration, one into Trump’s handling of classified documents, the other as to whether his actions on Jan. 6th, 2021, were an attempt to overturn the 2020 election. Both cases were dismissed.

An email reviewed by The Post states The Hatch Act Unit, which enforces a law restricting government employees from engaging in political activities, has begun reviewing the former Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice. The email was written by Senior Counsel Charles Baldis at OSC.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

When your political hitman starts looking like a headline liability​

The left found and crowned their legal avenger: Jack Smith, their remedy in very fine suits to four years of Trump.

In secret clubhouse meetings above their parents' garage, the left whispered reverently about Smith's independence, hailed his stoicism, and grasped him as a firewall between democracy and destruction.

The right, however, looked at things differently. They saw Smith as a dogged, smirking prosecutor with a habit of filing charges just before primaries and playing a game of chicken with due process.

Both sides, however, agreed on one thing: he was relentless.

Now, that same man finds himself under federal investigation for potentially violating the Hatch Act, a statute meant to prevent law enforcement from becoming political tools.

Sen. Tom Cotton, who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, accused Smith of seeking to impact the 2024 election in his capacity as special counsel under the Biden-led Justice Department in a letter to the acting head of the Office of Special Counsel, Jamieson Greer, first obtained by Fox News Digital.
"As the Office of the Special Counsel is tasked with ensuring federal employees aren't conducting partisan political activity under the guise of their federal employment, you're well situated to determine whether Smith broke the law," the Arkansas Republican wrote.
"Many of Smith's legal actions seem to have no rationale except for an attempt to affect the 2024 election results – actions that would violate federal law," he continued.

That cringeworthy sound we're not hearing? It's the awkward silence of a media class that suddenly found itself unsure how to eulogize its white knight without tarnishing the cause.

The Hatch Act Hammer​

If you forgot, here's a quick review of the Hatch Act.

This act was created to prohibit executive branch officials, such as a special counsel, from using their authority to influence elections.

In this case, Jack Smith didn't simply toe the line; he ran past it with banners flying. According to Sen. Tom Cotton, Smith timed court filings, manipulated trial calendars, and played strategic legal chess just as the 2024 campaign heated up. Smith did his bloody best to jam President Trump into a courtroom the day before Super Tuesday.

If that's not election interference, what is?

The Office of Special Counsel's Hatch Act Unit has confirmed they're investigating Smith!

OMG!

 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

When your political hitman starts looking like a headline liability​

The left found and crowned their legal avenger: Jack Smith, their remedy in very fine suits to four years of Trump.

In secret clubhouse meetings above their parents' garage, the left whispered reverently about Smith's independence, hailed his stoicism, and grasped him as a firewall between democracy and destruction.



Jack Smith is now the hunted… but this new plot twist could be his final blow…



As you likely know by now, Jack Smith’s lawfare crusade against President Trump officially collapsed. The left threw everything they had at Trump, hoping their sham indictments would be the Hail Mary that stopped him from taking back the White House. It was straight from the dirty Dem playbook… weaponize the justice system, drag the process out, and bleed your opponent dry in court, while giving the regime-run media all the juicy headlines they needed.

But it didn’t work. Trump won, and Smith’s cases are now dust. And in the most poetic twist, the man who tried to take down Trump is the one now being hunted.

Look back at the chaos and plotting just one year ago, and you’ll see how ready for battle these Deep State operatives were.






 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
🔥🔥🔥

They said no one is above the law, then built a law above everyone. Early this morning, Newsweek ran an unbelievable story headlined, “Jack Smith Faces New Arrest Calls Over ‘Arctic Frost’ Investigation.” The Storm has reached Category Two— and it’s getting very, very, cold.




I called the story “unbelievable” not because this kind of treacherous weaponization by Democrats is unimaginable, but because it was so poorly conceived that it calls into question progressives’ admittedly tenuous grasp on reality at all.

To remind you: “Arctic Frost” is what Biden special prosecutor Jack Smith called a double-top-secret FBI operation that surveilled over 100 conservative groups, including the GOP. Now recall that Nixon was forced to resign in disgrace for allegedly surveilling just the DNC, and just once. Just saying.

Yesterday, Senator Chuck Grassley and the Senate Judiciary Committee published new documents disclosing that Arctic Frost also secretly tapped the phones of ten sitting Republican Senators. They were: Lindsey Graham, Bill Hagerty, Josh Hawley, Dan Sullivan, Tommy Tuberville, Ron Johnson, Cynthia Lummis, Marsha Blackburn, and Mike Kelly:




If Republicans in Congress weren’t already convinced that the Democrats are a threat to everybody —and not just Trump, MAGA people, January 6th tourists, pro-life activists, antivaxxers, and Catholics— well, this should do it.

The document proving Biden spied on the Senate was helpfully provided by a cooperating whistleblower. One begins to wonder how many whistleblowers they have and how much more will be coming out before all-Hades demands payment.

The documents could only have come from a whistleblower because Biden’s FBI used secret archives to conceal incriminating information. These storage facilities are paper-only, and are stuffed in burn bags in the backs of random, locked broom closets in various locales where nobody knows. This practice allows the conspirators to avoid liability for destroying government governments, but at the same time, by putting them where they can never be found, they’ve effectively destroyed them.

The newly revealed intel inflates the whole sordid story from a tale of “get Trump” to something much more personal— get Congress. They’re supposed to oversee the FBI, not be part of a dragnet fishing expedition. It’s one thing to investigate a single lawmaker for corruption or something. It is a completely different kettle of carp to drag groups of Senators in search of prosecutable crimes. That’s KGB-style stuff.




If Congress cannot oversee the FBI, then the FBI now oversees Congress. In other words, the Constitution’s checks bounced.

Angry Democrats convicted President Trump of 34 felonies for notations on check stubs. Imagine the howls of outrage had Trump’s FBI been spying on them. Put another way, if Democrats fail to be equally outraged now, how can they complain about having their own phones tapped?

In short, this new disclosure dramatically escalates the investigation into Biden’s dirty tricks. Nothing concentrates a lawmaker’s mind like realizing the surveillance state has been eavesdropping on them.

The Senate runs on status, and nothing punctures its self-importance like discovering it’s been treated as a suspect class. The instinct for self-preservation transcends party lines. Even the most surveillance-sympathetic senators will now flirt with reform, if only to prove they’re not the executive’s lapdogs. The Bureau may find itself facing the kind of bipartisan scrutiny it hasn’t seen since the Church Committee — and this time, the Committee has Wi-Fi, A.I., and more lawyers.




Put another way, now that the Senate has discovered it was among the hunted, the mood in Washington has shifted from detached curiosity to personal outrage. What was once “partisan oversight” is now institutional self-defense. The difference is night and subpoena. Even better, the FBI’s new leadership isn’t resisting; they’re cooperating. That changes everything. It’s another stark difference from the Church Committee days. This time, the Bureau isn’t digging in — it’s handing over shovels. The quiet dread inside the executive branch isn’t that Congress will overreach, but that it finally won’t stop.

The Storm has reached Category Two, and the air on Capitol Hill crackles with the electric energy of self-preservation. Senators who once rolled their eyes at “weaponization” are now sketching the blueprints for reform on the backs of subpoena folders. It’s exactly the kind of scandal that births history’s big resets —Church-Committee-scale stuff— but this time, the Bureau isn’t digging in; it’s digging out.

For the moment, set aside ‘arrests,’ however satisfying those might be. Think bigger.

All those wrathful senators are furiously brainstorming how to hem in the intelligence agencies. They’re not doing it for us; they’re doing it for themselves. But in Washington, self-preservation is the only reliable form of public service, and to protect themselves, they’ll have to dribble out a little protection to the rest of us, too.

For the first time in a generation, repeal of the Patriot Act is conceivably on the table. The same law that built the surveillance empire might now be the first casualty of its excesses. When Congress rewrites the rules this time, an obliging FBI won’t be the mulish adversary— it’ll be volunteering as Exhibit A. And if this storm keeps building, the next wave won’t just wash away a scandal; it might cleanse decades of bureaucratic rot.



 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Sen. Rand Paul: How Far Did Jack Smith Go to Spy on Republican Members of Congress?



After years of fighting to protect our constitutional rights against the surveillance state, I was still shocked, though perhaps not surprised, to learn that Special Counsel Jack Smith, who was appointed to investigate Donald Trump, seems to have misused grand jury subpoenas to spy on nine Republican members of Congress by obtaining their phone records.

Ironically, some of these members who were spied on by Jack Smith have opposed my efforts to limit the powers of intelligence agencies to the confines of the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches.

The surveillance conducted on these members of Congress would have indicated when and to whom a call was made, the duration of the call, and the general location of where the call was made. This information is exactly the kind of information I warned would be abused.

These grand jury subpoenas likely violate the conclusions of the Supreme Court. This abuse of power should not go unchecked.

In Carpenter v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that people have a privacy interest in their geo-location information or their whereabouts and that government requests for a person’s geo-location should require evidence of probable cause or a warrant consistent with the Fourth Amendment.

Chief Justice Roberts wrote in the majority opinion: “The Government will be able to use subpoenas to acquire records in the overwhelming majority of investigations. We hold only that a warrant is required in the rare case where the suspect has a legitimate privacy interest in records held by a third party.”

The majority ruled that one’s geo-location from cell phone metadata was, indeed, a legitimate privacy interest.

Robert’s decision explains that, “this Court has never held that the Government may subpoena third parties for records in which the subject has a reasonable expectation of privacy.”

The Roberts opinion responded to a dissent from Justic Alito: “the [Alito] dissent should recognize that CSLI [cell site location information] is an entirely different species of business record – something that implicates basic Fourth Amendment concerns about arbitrary government power much more directly than corporate tax or payroll ledgers.”

Before the Carpenter decision, records held by third parties typically were not given full Fourth Amendment protections. The majority opinion in Carpenter, however, states that a current understanding of what is equivalent to one’s papers and effects has changed in the digital age such that: “If the third-party doctrine does not apply to the ‘modern-day equivalents of an individual’s own ‘papers’ or ‘effects,’’ then the clear implication is that the documents should receive full Fourth Amendment protection. We simply think that such protection should extend as well to a detailed log of a person’s movements over several years.”
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Grassley Reveals Jack Smith Sent 197 Subpoenas Targeting More than 400 Republicans in Arctic Frost Investigation



“I’ve obtained through legally protected whistleblower disclosures,” Grassley said during a press conference on Wednesday. “197 subpoenas were issued by Jack Smith and his team. These subpoenas were issued to 34 individuals and 163 businesses, including financial institutions.”

Grassley explained that one of the main points of contact on all of the subpoenas was dirty cop and former FBI Agent Walter Giardina.

The subpoenas requested records and communications related to over 430 individuals and organizations – all aimed at Republicans.

Click here to see the list of all Republican/Trump-supporting individuals and businesses targeted by Jack Smith.


“One subpoena to Apple sought records related to Trump and the ‘January 6th Prison Choir,'” Grassley said.

“Some subpoenas to individuals and businesses sought statistical data and analysis relating to donors and fundraising efforts,” Grassley said. “Contrary to what Smith has said publicly, this was a fishing expedition.”

“If this had happened to Democrats, they’d be as rightly outraged as we are outraged,” Grassley added.




1761831278939.png
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

The 'Arctic Frost' Spying Scandal Gets So Much Worse, and It Leads Back to Infamous Judge Boasberg



As RedState reported, Republican senators held a press conference on Wednesday, and what they revealed about the Arctic Frost scandal was incredibly disturbing. Describing it as "worse than Watergate," Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) presented evidence that 92 different conservative organizations or individuals were targeted by Jack Smith and the Biden-era Department of Justice.

All of this was done under the guise of going after President Donald Trump over the 2020 election, and eight GOP senators also had their phone records subpoenaed, among other intrusions. That's where things get even crazier. According to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), infamous left-wing Judge James Boasberg was near the heart of this scandal, helping the Biden administration cover its tracks.




 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

New Docs Reveal Jack Smith Intentionally Violated Congressional Republicans’ Constitutional Rights



This email may represent the first public evidence that the Biden Administration’s DOJ knew the special counsel’s office planned to subpoena congressional Republicans. But the scandal is even greater because in “concurring” in Smith’s use of subpoenas to target communications of members of Congress, the DOJ’s Public Integrity Section expressly acknowledged the unconstitutionality of the proposed course of action.

“As you are aware, there is some litigation risk regarding whether compelled disclosure of toll records of a Member’s legislative calls violates the Speech or Debate Clause in the D.C. Circuit,” Principal Deputy Chief of the DOJ’s Public Integrity Section John Keller wrote in a May 17, 2023 email to two top members of the special counsel’s team. Significantly, that email then cited the controlling precedent of United States v. Rayburn House Office Building, 497 F.3d 654, 662 (D.C. Cir. 2007), citing that appellate court decision’s holding that under the Speech or Debate Clause, “[t]he bar on compelled disclosure is absolute.” That email also cited In re Grand Jury Investigation, 587 F.2d 589, 594 (3d Cir. 1978) as establishing “[t]he caselaw is clear that a legislator asserting the invasion of the Speech or Debate Clause privilege by use of a grand jury subpoena to a third party may intervene and oppose such use.”

Notwithstanding the clarity of the D.C. Circuit’s holding in Rayburn House Office Building, “that a search that allows agents of the Executive to review privileged materials without the Member’s consent violates the [Speech or Debate] Clause,” the Biden Administration agreed with Special Counsel Smith’s decision to subpoena the congressional Republicans’ telephone records. The oxymoronically named Public Integrity Section justified its concurrence based on its “understanding of the low likelihood that any of the Members listed below would be charged,” and therefore “the litigation risk should be minimal here.”
 
Top