Midnightrider
Well-Known Member
No, the fact that you are responding directly to things you claim to be ignoring make it true. And yes, you are too stupid to realize you are outing yourself.
Judge Nap speaks out
- Thread starter Chris0nllyn
- Start date
TCROW
Well-Known Member
Midnightrider
Well-Known Member
Like I said, you are obviously too stupid to figure it out.
For someone who claims to not be able to see my posts your sure do a lot of reading them
I know critical this NOT your strong suit, especially when You THINK you are the smartest sock sucker in the room
has it ever occurred to you
View attachment 136927
within the 1st 2 min of an ignored member posting ......
I only post or comment or ask 'is 'XYZ' posting' because doing so keeps you retards all spun up and sputtering
and you call me the dummy ...... I got you coming and going Hook, Line and Sinker
you are still on ignore ....
I still don't see your inane
but so split that hair I know you are going to,
NO it is not 'ignoring' someone in the strictest sense, but I choose where and when to read your drivel
has it ever occurred to you
- I do have several forum members on ignore
- this little tidbit shows up
View attachment 136927
within the 1st 2 min of an ignored member posting ......
I only post or comment or ask 'is 'XYZ' posting' because doing so keeps you retards all spun up and sputtering
and you call me the dummy ...... I got you coming and going Hook, Line and Sinker
you are still on ignore ....
I still don't see your inane
but so split that hair I know you are going to,
NO it is not 'ignoring' someone in the strictest sense, but I choose where and when to read your drivel
Midnightrider
Well-Known Member
It’s not just not ignoring, it’s being fixated on what you are pretending to ignore. Just like I said.I know critical this NOT your strong suit, especially when You THINK you are the smartest sock sucker in the room
has it ever occurred to you
View attachment 136927
- I do have several forum members on ignore
- this little tidbit shows up
within the 1st 2 min of an ignored member posting ......
I only post or comment or ask 'is 'XYZ' posting' because doing so keeps you retards all spun up and sputtering
and you call me the dummy ...... I got you coming and going Hook, Line and Sinker
you are still on ignore ....
I still don't see your inane
but so split that hair I know you are going to,
NO it is not 'ignoring' someone in the strictest sense, but I choose where and when to read your drivel
You spend half your day posting C&P propaganda you haven’t read and the other half clicking ‘show ignored content’ and then responding that you can’t see a poster you are responding directly to.
PsyOps
Pixelated
So, given this rationale, trying to murder someone, even though you don't actually murder someone, you are guilty of murder. And you accuse me of confusing myself? If Trump is guilty of attempted obstruction, and that is a crime, then say so (that is a comment to Mueller), then let the legal system address it; whether it's impeachment or actually charging him when he leaves office.
PsyOps
Pixelated
I see... if it's Barr (a trained lawyer), he's dishonest and covering up, because Trump hired him. But if it's Napolitano (a trained lawyer), he's honest and telling the truth. Why? Because it fits your narrative. They are both 'trained lawyers'. You are not. I am not. I find Napolitano to be a pretty upstanding legal analyst most of the time. I happen to think Napolitano is wrong on this.
Midnightrider
Well-Known Member
Attempted obstruction IS obstruction. It’s not confusing, it’s the law.
TCROW
Well-Known Member
Barr earned that title many years ago.
This_person
Well-Known Member
From William Saffire.
That means as much as a nickname given by Hannity or Matthews or Maddow or Limbaugh would give - absolutely nothing.
TCROW
Well-Known Member
OK. But that wasn’t the question.
This_person
Well-Known Member
Nor was when he earned it.
He got the nickname from a crappy opinion-piece writer. It's meaningless. Psy's response was to suggest it was meaningless by comparing him to the judge, mine it to suggest it is meaningless based on the source. You said he has the title - what is it's meaning to you?