Judicial Corruption and Misdirection
- Thread starter GURPS
- Start date
LightRoasted
If I may ...
For your consideration ...
These judges are not Christians.
These judges are not Christians.
BOP
Well-Known Member
Trans vet gets government-paid vaginoplasty, then hangs himself a month later... - Revolver News
They're turning into memes and the left doesn't care.
revolver.news
BOP
Well-Known Member
President Trump makes a shrewd move to stop activist judges
President Trump makes a shrewd move to stop activist judges... - Revolver News
Trump has a plan to shut down activist judges—before they shut down America First.
revolver.news
Judge shopping, NeverTrump leader, and J6 cruelty: Jeb Boasberg is the Antifa of the bench…
Wouldn’t it be just par for the course if we found out USAID was somehow funding Judge Boasberg’s activism? At this point, nothing would surprise us. That’s how absurd—and corrupt—this whole circus has become.
As it stands now, with his impressive progressive resume, Judge Boasberg is an activist’s activist—he’s the Antifa of the judiciary.
And it all starts with his availability—Boasberg keeps himself right there on the shelf, ready for any judge-shopping assignment that needs a partisan rubber stamp. Need a biased bench-warmer to weaponize your case? Judge Boasberg is your guy. He’s not just available—he’s eager. Heck, he’ll probably show up on his day off just to help the regime get the ruling it wants.
Maybe that’s why the case didn’t land with Judge Contreras, huh? They needed a guaranteed slam dunk—for the rapists and murderers from bloodthirsty gangs. Can’t leave that kind of thing to chance when your priority is protecting criminals over citizens and pushing the left’s twisted and failed progressive agenda.
This is likely called “judge shopping,” and it’s highly illegal.
And this isn’t just illegal judge shopping—it’s a total mockery of our justice system. This is left-wing extremism in a robe. It’s the Antifa version of customer service.
Just look at Judge Boasberg’s seething cruelty when he sentenced a non-violent husband and wife over misdemeanor charges. And as you read this account, keep one thing in mind: this is the same judge who was so concerned about the due process of bloodthirsty illegal gangbangers that he ordered an entire plane full of them flown back into the country. But when it comes to peaceful, non-violent American citizens? He throws the book at them without blinking.
Julie Kelly:
What these activist judges are doing to Trump is not about who he is -- it is about who they are
By Patricia McCarthyThis arrogant, overreaching Boasberg was all in on Crossfire Hurricane, the fabricated plot that was Hillary Clinton’s paid-for Russian dossier.
So, from the outset of this old and ongoing tale, Boasberg is corrupt, determined to do the left’s bidding from the bench. He also let former FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith off with probation and no jailtime for altering an email used in obtaining a FISA surveillance warrant against Carter Page, a textbook case of unreasonable search and seizure prohibited by the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution.
He’s certainly not alone.
Sen. Chuck Schumer has bragged about putting 235 progressive judges on the bench during the Biden regime, saying they were there to serve as "a barrier" to President Trump's presidency.
The left is very proud of their ongoing campaign to destroy America as founded.
In short, Democrats are enemies of the state.
How is demanding that vicious, violent criminals, Tren de Aragua and MS-13 members, remain in the U.S. after all the violent rapes and murders they have committed, a righteous thing?
Does that not qualify one as a traitor?
That is Judge Boasberg. He has no legitimate jurisdiction over national security, and yet he is claiming it and no one is stopping him, proving Justice Roberts is implicated in this terrible crime, too. The pair of them got their start under the Bush dynasty, putting them in the same virulently anti-Trump camp as the NeverTrumps.
BOP
Well-Known Member
REPORT: One-Third of D.C. District Judges Were Not Born in the United States and Had No Prior Judicial Experience When Appointed | The Gateway Pundit | by Mike LaChance
A recent report highlights a striking trend in the DC District Court: one-third of its judges were born abroad and lacked prior judicial experience, raising critical questions about their qualifications and the implications for American justice.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
In a late Monday written order, U.S. District Judge Jamal Whitehead of the Western District of Washington found the department unlawfully canceled contracts to the group, saying executive branch management of a refugee resettlement program did not extend to an order virtually eliminating it.
“While the Government enjoys significant discretion in administering (U.S. Refugee Admissions Program), that discretion does not extend to abandoning statutory obligations or rendering the program effectively inoperative,” Whitehead, whom President Joe Biden appointed to the bench, said in the order.
Whitehead gave the government until March 31 to submit a report showing that it is complying with the order.
The U.S. Department of Justice filed an appeal Monday that will be heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.
Melissa Keaney, the lead attorney for International Refugee Assistance Project, the group representing the religious organization challenging the cancellations, said in a statement that “it’s time for the government to live up to its moral and legal obligations by fully restoring funding and access to this lifesaving program.”
“The court has been clear yet again,” she said. “The government’s efforts to dismantle the refugee resettlement system are unlawful and harming refugees whose lives have been thrown into limbo.”
Well that group will see their funds cut. Might be the way to go. Shut down funding to the NGO's and end grants to them. Then they have no money to pay lawyers.
Back on March 22, CBS News reported that the Trump administration was revoking the legal status of 530,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans who'd been flown into the country on President Joe Biden's "parole flights," facilitated by the CBP One app. Biden actually claimed that flying in immigrants from these four countries would ease the backlog at the Southern border.
Their legal status was meant to be temporary anyway. Biden's program gave them the equivalent of two-year work permits. As AG Hamilton pointed out, "the Biden admin already announced in late 2024 (election year when they started taking these issues seriously) they would not be renewing the legal status of any of the 530K migrants under this program."
Now, shockingly, a judge has intervened, blocking President Donald Trump from revoking the migrants' legal status.
Their legal status was meant to be temporary anyway. Biden's program gave them the equivalent of two-year work permits. As AG Hamilton pointed out, "the Biden admin already announced in late 2024 (election year when they started taking these issues seriously) they would not be renewing the legal status of any of the 530K migrants under this program."
Now, shockingly, a judge has intervened, blocking President Donald Trump from revoking the migrants' legal status.
Judge Boasberg Finds Probable Cause to Hold Gov’t in Contempt in Deportations Case
Boasberg’s order came after the Supreme Court vacated his orders and said the case was brought in the wrong court.
“The fact that the Supreme Court determined that this Court’s TROs suffered from a venue defect does not affect—let alone moot—the compliance inquiry presently teed up here,” he said.
[clip]
Boasberg’s order is the latest escalation in an ongoing battle between the executive and judicial branches, which have encountered a wave of lawsuits challenging President Donald Trump’s agenda. Trump had previously called for the impeachment of Boasberg and other judges.
District Judge Paula Xinis held a hearing on April 15 during which she indicated that she might similarly find cause that the government is in contempt in the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, whom the government deported. In that case, Xinis granted expedited discovery, including depositions from administration officials, to determine how it proceeded after her order requiring the facilitation of Abrego Garcia’s return.
Boasberg’s order states that if the government were to choose not to “purge” its alleged contempt, the court would “proceed to identify the individual(s) responsible for the contumacious conduct by determining whose ‘specific act or omission’ caused the noncompliance.” The court, he said, would begin requiring declarations but could move to either depositions or hearings with live witness testimony.
Boasberg said the next step would be prosecution by an attorney from the government or an attorney appointed by the court, if the government were to decline to appoint one.