Leftie Storms Off Set, Couldn't Answer Question

[tommyjones]

You're so fulla crap your eyes are brown!!

Show me proof their sole intent was to antagonize him you dolt.

Everything was FINE until he was asked a question completely relevant to the discussion and the little pussy wouldn't answer because he would have exposed himself.

Why can't you morons admit your positions are wrong and don't work??

Here's your seal.

did you watch it?

seiously, FNN looses crediblity when they attack a guest and talk over them constantly. can you show me another "unbiased" news organization that shouts down the guests from the one party and then gives the ol' reach around to anyone they support?

 

[El_Kabong]

The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money.
Alexis de Tocqueville

The key point is that the public is being bribed WITH IT'S OWN MONEY. Public money is also used for many projects that have questionable benefit to the public. For example...
Financially, who benefits the most from the Iraq War? Who benefits from the Ex-Im Bank? Who benefits the most from oil royalty policy?

The GAO reported $295 Billion dollars in cost overruns on defense projects.
The total projected Federal budget for Education in FY2009 is $99.9 Billion. Transporation: $83.9 Billion; Welfare (Including unemployment, children and families and housing): $283.1 Billion.

Is there any doubt why the public is pissed?

 

[vraiblonde]

can you show me another "unbiased" news organization that shouts down the guests from the one party and then gives the ol' reach around to anyone they support?

CNN, for one. When they bother to even have a guest from the other party.

Ever watch Hardball? Chris Matthews pretends to be unbiased, but he's a hard Leftie who shouts his guests down - again, when he bothers to have a guest with an opposing view. So add MSNBC to the list.

 

[tommyjones]

CNN, for one. When they bother to even have a guest from the other party.

Ever watch Hardball? Chris Matthews pretends to be unbiased, but he's a hard Leftie who shouts his guests down - again, when he bothers to have a guest with an opposing view. So add MSNBC to the list.

i will add chris mathews, although i have to say i have never watched his show. just never liked him. But again, that makes him biased, just like FNN.

 

[Baja28]

did you watch it?

seiously, FNN looses crediblity when they attack a guest and talk over them constantly. can you show me another "unbiased" news organization that shouts down the guests from the one party and then gives the ol' reach around to anyone they support?

Hell yea I watched it!! Did you??

How was he attacked?? How was he antagonized?? He was asked a VERY relevant question. He went on a rant and wouldn't answer!! He was busted! And when he stormed off, he was PWNED by the anchors.

 

[cwo_ghwebb]

The key point is that the public is being bribed WITH IT'S OWN MONEY. Public money is also used for many projects that have questionable benefit to the public. For example...
Financially, who benefits the most from the Iraq War? Who benefits from the Ex-Im Bank? Who benefits the most from oil royalty policy?

The GAO reported $295 Billion dollars in cost overruns on defense projects.
The total projected Federal budget for Education in FY2009 is $99.9 Billion. Transporation: $83.9 Billion; Welfare (Including unemployment, children and families and housing): $283.1 Billion.

Is there any doubt why the public is pissed?

It isn't just the defense budget with cost overruns. Cripe just look at Charles County and our wonderful socialist Commissioners. Everything they've touched has a cost overrun, including a small street that runs from Washington Avenue to Crain Highway.

But they can find money to fund stupid looking birthday cakes and signs everywhere with their names on them bragging about how they're spending 'our' money.

You can bet just a few citizens here are pissed.

The defense budget is 4% of GDP, the entitlement programs 8.7%. How much can be cut from the Defense budget to increase funding of entitlement programs?

Just a rhetorical question. How much money does the country have to throw down the sinkhole before it realizes that money isn't the solution to changing irresponsible folks' behavior?

 

[vraiblonde]

But again, that makes him biased, just like FNN.

Fox doesn't claim to be unbiased - they claim to be fair and balanced. And they are. You almost NEVER see a show where both sides aren't presented.

 

[PsyOps]

it really speaks to the whole probelm with FNN. they had the guy on with the express intent of antagonizing him, not to interview him. If they hadn't been talking over him, i am sure he would have stayed.
I watched hannity be a complete ass to a "guest" after one of the debates. what was funny was he didn't yell over any other guests, he only used that tactic on hie (D) guests.

i would think the (D)'s would just stop sending their reps to fox if this is going to be the way they are treated.

Let me help folks translate this:

It speaks for the whole FNN problem of being able to ask leftwing zealots tough questions when they have become so accustom to being asked softball questions. They don’t know what to do when they don’t have an answer that makes them look like the socialists they really are. Just like “Joe”… When BO was actually challenged by a actual citizen and not one of his hacks in the media his true self was exposed and then his surrogates in his campaign and the media decided to attack this citizen instead of going after BO with the same line of questioning wanting to know more. So the only network willing to do that is FNN. And the left just doesn’t know what to do when put in a corner.

Tommy… the reason the “(D)” send their reps there is because FNN is THE MOST WATCHED news network hands down. Regardless of where you THINK they lean, people of all types are tuning out of the blatantly biased MSPMS and NBC and CNN and going to Fox because it appears Fox is doing something they like over the others. If the “(D)” want to be heard the larger audience they go to Fox. Wetting you pants over this isn’t going to change that. Facing the truth about will keep your pants dry.

 

[tommyjones]

Let me help folks translate this:

It speaks for the whole FNN problem of being able to ask leftwing zealots tough questions when they have become so accustom to being asked softball questions. They don’t know what to do when they don’t have an answer that makes them look like the socialists they really are. Just like “Joe”… When BO was actually challenged by a actual citizen and not one of his hacks in the media his true self was exposed and then his surrogates in his campaign and the media decided to attack this citizen instead of going after BO with the same line of questioning wanting to know more. So the only network willing to do that is FNN. And the left just doesn’t know what to do when put in a corner.

Tommy… the reason the “(D)” send their reps there is because FNN is THE MOST WATCHED news network hands down. Regardless of where you THINK they lean, people of all types are tuning out of the blatantly biased MSPMS and NBC and CNN and going to Fox because it appears Fox is doing something they like over the others. If the “(D)” want to be heard the larger audience they go to Fox. Wetting you pants over this isn’t going to change that. Facing the truth about will keep your pants dry.

what is it with you guys and wetting the pants. is it really so common in ultra right circles that it is an everyday expression?


and i have no probelm with them asking the tough questions, i wish there was more of that everywhere. but,a s you can see for this vieo, if you are going to shout down any response you dont want to hear and refuse to let the people answer the question, you shouldn't be surprised when they walk off. the attitude shown after he left indicates that is what they were shooting for.

 

[El_Kabong]

It isn't just the defense budget with cost overruns. Cripe just look at Charles County and our wonderful socialist Commissioners. Everything they've touched has a cost overrun, including a small street that runs from Washington Avenue to Crain Highway.

But they can find money to fund stupid looking birthday cakes and signs everywhere with their names on them bragging about how they're spending 'our' money.

You can bet just a few citizens here are pissed.

The defense budget is 4% of GDP, the entitlement programs 8.7%. How much can be cut from the Defense budget to increase funding of entitlement programs?

Just a rhetorical question. How much money does the country have to throw down the sinkhole before it realizes that money isn't the solution to changing irresponsible folks' behavior?

The point I'm trying to make is one of priorities. The Republicans call Democrats the "tax and spend" party while they not only spend more but also increase future indebtedness. The GOP seems to prefer to favor business over the welfare of the public.

For example:
There is evidence the Bush administration has ignored white collar crime.
F.B.I. Struggles to Handle Financial Fraud Cases

VanDevelder: The other multibillion-dollar scandal

Why should we trust the Republican Party (again) when they have a clear record of acting against the public interest?

 

[PsyOps]

what is it with you guys and wetting the pants. is it really so common in ultra right circles that it is an everyday expression?


and i have no probelm with them asking the tough questions, i wish there was more of that everywhere. but,a s you can see for this vieo, if you are going to shout down any response you dont want to hear and refuse to let the people answer the question, you shouldn't be surprised when they walk off. the attitude shown after he left indicates that is what they were shooting for.

The question at hand was “is the media right to attack Joe”. Schultz couldn’t answer that question so instead Schultz brought his family into this with his family-owned business when that wasn’t even the question. Since Schultz decided to take the interview in his own direction Malzberg decided to ask him a simple but pointed question. This is how liberals are… when asked a simple but pointed question that they can’t answer they divert on to something unrelated. When it doesn’t go THEIR way they storm off the set. A ridiculous display of poor sportsmanship.

Sometimes things are pretty cut and dry Tommy… ANSWER THE QUESTION. Liberals don’t want to go on Fox because they are held to answering the question and not allowed to spin things into their own interview.

 

[Larry Gude]

...

Fox doesn't claim to be unbiased - they claim to be fair and balanced. And they are. You almost NEVER see a show where both sides aren't presented.

...pfft.

Who is the GOP'er on CNN? David Gergen? They'll have Bill Bennet sometimes, him and three from the other side, which is, intellectually, about right.

MSNBC gets credit for having Buchanan but he can't stand Bush and his gaggle of neo cons and more than I can.

FOX constantly lets the left have their say. The problem is, like Schultz, when you truly have a conversation, it's not so easy for the left unlike the softballs they get every where else.

 

[vraiblonde]

...pfft.

Who is the GOP'er on CNN? David Gergen? They'll have Bill Bennet sometimes, him and three from the other side, which is, intellectually, about right.

MSNBC gets credit for having Buchanan but he can't stand Bush and his gaggle of neo cons and more than I can.

FOX constantly lets the left have their say. The problem is, like Schultz, when you truly have a conversation, it's not so easy for the left unlike the softballs they get every where else.

Why are you pfft-ing me when I just said the exact same thing? You appear to be having comprehension issues today.

 

[Baja28]

And....

did you watch it?

seiously, FNN looses crediblity when they attack a guest and talk over them constantly. can you show me another "unbiased" news organization that shouts down the guests from the one party and then gives the ol' reach around to anyone they support?

I just watched it again.

Ed: "My boys at EA Schultz Construction really like this plan and they will see some nice tax incentives...."

Steve: "Do they make more than $250K??"

Ed: "You know Steve, everytime I come here, I am attacked...

Steve: "It's a relevant question, do they make more than $250?"

Ed:

Entire cast:

 

[Larry Gude]

...

Why are you pfft-ing me when I just said the exact same thing? You appear to be having comprehension issues today.

...it was an agreement 'pfft' and then some.

You said:

And they are. You almost NEVER see a show where both sides aren't presented.

And I was adding to it that FOX is FAR more fair than the other guys. The other guys BARELY represent the other side and often with the mildest righty they can find.

 

[cwo_ghwebb]

The point I'm trying to make is one of priorities. The Republicans call Democrats the "tax and spend" party while they not only spend more but also increase future indebtedness. The GOP seems to prefer to favor business over the welfare of the public.

For example:
There is evidence the Bush administration has ignored white collar crime.
F.B.I. Struggles to Handle Financial Fraud Cases

VanDevelder: The other multibillion-dollar scandal

Why should we trust the Republican Party (again) when they have a clear record of acting against the public interest?

Hoover tried what Obama is proposing. That worked really well didn't it?

I don't like tax and spend and increase indebtedness either. My problem with entitlement programs is they never disappear.