Well you need to pay better attention. Even if we just go on the last week alone why would Trump congratulate Putin despite every one of his advisors telling him not to?
Probably the same reason Obama did the same thing. The Obama White House repeatedly said Putin's first election was filled with fraud; then, when Putin won, Obama called to congratulate him and talk about things on which the US and Russia could work together.
Or, was Obama a secret colluder with Russia, too? Is that your contention?
BS. Why don't you care that he flagrantly disregards the emoluments clause?
Because I believe that people staying in his hotels puts just as much in his pockets as the sales of Obama's books to foreigners put in his pockets in comparison to their net worths. No president has been mandated to stop selling their products when they became president - ever - in the history of the United States. Why would Trump be any different?
[why don't you care when he] Lies literally multiple times a day, puts our country in jeopardy with his lack of knowledge, tact, diplomacy ?
Um, I do. When it matters, I speak out about how much I don't like it. Just like I did with Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush, and Reagan.
Setch Rich, Pizzagate, Uranium One? The lie that Clinton laughed at a child victim of rape?
Birtherism? Obama being a secret Muslim.
All I say is Seth Rich, Pizza-gate, and U1 are worthy of investigation. Those have actual crimes associated with them. If a solid investigation proves nothing happened (or can't find evidence of something happening), then the investigation should be wrapped up. Just like the Trump-Russia collusion investigation should be wrapped up, as there has not once been an indication of collusion, and much evidence to show Russia was doing (during the feckless Obama administration that literally ridiculed the idea of Russian meddling in the United States at all) is the same thing that Russia has done for decades in the United States.
Clinton laughed about lie detector tests, as I recall, because she was positive that her client was a child rapist and he beat the test. She found that funny. She attacked the victim in that case, because she believed her client to be guilty, which is why she found him beating the lie detector test amusing. This is not disputable, this is on tape. She didn't laugh at the victim, she laughed at the process (lie detector) being faulty for a person she believed to be guilty after attacking the victim with seemingly made up "points" to help her client beat the rap. Now, you would argue that everyone deserves a defense (even the guilty), and on a systematic level I would fully agree with you. But, you also have made the point that just because something is legal does not mean it is ethical, and you don't want unethical people in charge of our government - which means you would have been conspicuously against Sec Clinton even running for president. But, you're a hypocrite so you were not against her.
I am not a birther. I have repeatedly said I think that BHO, Jr., was likely born in HI. Now, it is indisputable that BHO, Jr., fought proving that in a court of law on many occasions, costing himself millions of dollars to do so, and that the eventual BC he provided has been debunked of authenticity by friends of BHO and foes alike. My guess is, there is something else on the BC for which he has a desire to keep personal. That said, girls like to be around momma when they have a baby if possible, and this was possible. So, common sense says he was born in HI.
I've never once claimed Obama was a secret or open or any other kind of Muslim. It's indisputable that he was raised in environments that would make him sympathetic to Muslims, thus giving him the best position of anyone in the world to try and solve the disputes between Islamic terror and the western world. He did exactly zip to accomplish that, but he was better suited than any other world leader - past or present - to resolve the issues.