Lt. Rice aquitted in Freddie Gray case

This_person

Well-Known Member
Nope. Not at all. I'm suggesting that people should not chose "criminal activity" as a career, first, and should not then behave in an erratic and violent manner when their chosen career puts them inevitably, and often, in the custody of law enforcement personnel.
And, if they do, it's ok if they happen to die in custody from the lack of taking reasonable care of them. That's the logical end to what you're suggesting here.

Because, after all, we don't need trials or anything - we know Gray was guilty of, um, something or other, and that if he dies that's just fine.

Right?
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
Inorite? Seems a bit excessive to me but...whatever.

So, we can agree that's stupidly excessive. Now maybe we can come up with something else?

the bus drivers, of course, were dealing with traffic accidents and conditions on the buses based on what was given to them.

If the police van had no seat belts, I'd suggest the problem is the van and not the police.

Seems the van HAD belts, but the officers chose not to use them - against policy and what any reasonable person would do.

Seems a bit different cases here.
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
So, we can agree that's stupidly excessive. Now maybe we can come up with something else?

.

Life in prison, no parole? That's what we should give people that ignore the label and step on the top ladder step, or tear the tags off mattresses.
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
Life in prison, no parole? That's what we should give people that ignore the label and step on the top ladder step, or tear the tags off mattresses.

Or, people who drive drunk and result in the deaths of others. Or, people who cause accidents through neglect that results in the death of others.

Just spit-balling here, but those seem more similar to this situation.
 

Grumpy

Well-Known Member
****DISCLAIMER***** Only 1 horse was killed in this thread, please disregard that it has been continually beaten.



Carry on..
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
So, we can agree that's stupidly excessive. Now maybe we can come up with something else?

the bus drivers, of course, were dealing with traffic accidents and conditions on the buses based on what was given to them.

If the police van had no seat belts, I'd suggest the problem is the van and not the police.

Seems the van HAD belts, but the officers chose not to use them - against policy and what any reasonable person would do.

Seems a bit different cases here.

Why didn't old Freddy buckle himself in? I don't have a cop come to my house to buckle me in. People who ride with me buckle themselves in.
Matter of fact if they don't and are caught. I don't get the ticket--they do.
 

stgislander

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Geesh... let's just all agree that all the officers involved should have been fired and lost their pensions just so this thread will die the death it rightly deserves?!
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
Geesh... let's just all agree that all the officers involved should have been fired and lost their pensions just so this thread will die the death it rightly deserves?!

Why don't we just agree that Freddie Gray dying probably took a lot of future crime off the street.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
And yet the "protocol" is no seat belts. Are you saying that the DOT is not being reasonable?

I am glad that buses have no seat belts. If they did they would have to start out to school two hours earlier and those stacked up behind them would never get to work on time while the driver waited for the kids to get buckled.
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
Why didn't old Freddy buckle himself in? I don't have a cop come to my house to buckle me in. People who ride with me buckle themselves in.
Matter of fact if they don't and are caught. I don't get the ticket--they do.

The handcuffs probably held him up a little.
 
Top