Mass hysteria

[GURPS]

I am not a PREMO member and therefore, am not afforded the protections of such.

You Are A Whiny Cry Baby ... I have gotten a timeout before, I know DJ and I am a Premo

 

[Kyle]

You Are A Whiny Cry Baby ... I have gotten a timeout before, I know DJ and I am a Premo

If he was smart, he'd pony up for the Premo so he can sit out his penalty at the SOMD bar sipping free draft beer while he waits.

 

[RoseRed]

If he was smart, he'd pony up for the Premo so he can sit out his penalty at the SOMD bar sipping free draft beer while he waits.

I got a time out for telling Penn he needed to change his pad and added a picture of an old fashioned sanitary belt.

 

[MiddleGround]

Re-read the posts people. And see the actual point.

I understand and accept why it is that I was penalized. That is not the point. The point is why these steps were not taken with ALL involved. Although, it is not surprising who has responded thus far nor are the responses posted.

 

[Kyle]

I got a time out for telling Penn he needed to change his pad and added a picture of an old fashioned sanitary belt.

Thing that got me in trouble the first time was a Halloween pic.

 

[RoseRed]

Thing that got me in trouble the first time was a Halloween pic.

I don't remember the picture...

 

[Grumpy]

Thing that got me in trouble the first time was a Halloween pic.

Please re-post it

 

[Bann]

 

[Bann]

:shrug:

 

[nutz]

Thing that got me in trouble the first time was a Halloween pic.

Like this one?

 

[Kyle]

Sorry it was ages ago. I don't have anymore.

And I've changed computers three times since then.

 

[black dog]

Really?? Its not very difficult to see someone's posts and their time stamp Don't you have anything better than "Uhhhh... how do you know?"

Funny how I ended up getting a 24-hour ban yet, the other member was free to post during those 24 hours and ever since. Hmmmm

So, will I get an answer to my question? Feel free to PM it to me if you would like. Here, I will re-state it in case you forgot.

"Why is it that I was penalized with a 24 hour ban due to something I posted when the other person received no penalty at all even though you quoted the offense and that quote CLEARLY showed that BOTH of us committed said "offense?"



Agree. In fact, I am willing to bet that there are some well-placed user names on here that are here strictly to get the masses riled up and posting

LOL.. You need some cheese with that whine over a short time out?

 

[black dog]

Re-read the posts people. And see the actual point.

I understand and accept why it is that I was penalized. That is not the point. The point is why these steps were not taken with ALL involved. Although, it is not surprising who has responded thus far nor are the responses posted.

I guess you didn't figure out in third grade,, it ain't fair...

 

[MiddleGround]

LOL.. You need some cheese with that whine over a short time out?

No. No I don't. Of course, you would have understood this (possibly?) if you read the very next post you quoted before posting this

I guess you didn't figure out in third grade,, it ain't fair...

I understand perfectly. I just didn't realize that a lot of people here haven't moved on mentally from the third grade. Exhibit A ^^^

 

[black dog]

No. No I don't. Of course, you would have understood this (possibly?) if you read the very next post you quoted before posting this



I understand perfectly. I just didn't realize that a lot of people here haven't moved on mentally from the third grade. Exhibit A ^^^

We aren't the ones crying here about being banned for a day..

 

[MiddleGround]

We aren't the ones crying here about being banned for a day..
View attachment 123545

I'll go ahead and break it down for you since you seem to be having a difficult time understanding what is happening here.... Ready?

The question (that is yet to be answered) is why the penalty was not shared by BOTH parties involved with the so-called infraction. Why was it that only one party in the altercation, in which both parties apparently broke the rules, was penalized.

Either way... it really isn't worth much more time. It's not like the atmosphere or leadership around here is going to change anyways. I was simply hoping for a polite conversation or even explanation on the reasoning. I now know that will never happen because it will mean admitting fault and.... God forbid. Right?

Carry on everyone

 

[Kyle]

 

[Gilligan]

Wait...not so fast...I still have popcorn left.

 

[Lurk]

, , ,why the penalty was not shared by BOTH parties involved with the so-called infraction. . . . .

Isn't it's obvious (obviously not since you haven't figured it out yet) that one member of the interchange was a douchbag of sufficient quantity to deserve a time out. The other had not yet attained sufficient level of douchebagginess to justify discipline. Or it's the fact that nobody likes you and wishes you would shut the #### up.

 

[black dog]

I'll go ahead and break it down for you since you seem to be having a difficult time understanding what is happening here.... Ready?

The question (that is yet to be answered) is why the penalty was not shared by BOTH parties involved with the so-called infraction. Why was it that only one party in the altercation, in which both parties apparently broke the rules, was penalized.

Either way... it really isn't worth much more time. It's not like the atmosphere or leadership around here is going to change anyways. I was simply hoping for a polite conversation or even explanation on the reasoning. I now know that will never happen because it will mean admitting fault and.... God forbid. Right?

Carry on everyone

Because crybaby, this in a privately owned entity. It doesn't have to be " Fair " and you don't have to like it. The funniest part is the only two members that cry about getting a temporary ban are KooKoocrackheadsmom and You..
You earned it, at least own it.