He throws a mean insect. Flies, particularly.You like the typical democrat. You don’t like somebody so you probably throw insects
He throws a mean insect. Flies, particularly.You like the typical democrat. You don’t like somebody so you probably throw insects
I resent that!You like the typical democrat. You don’t like somebody so you probably throw insects
I take it that you are okay with Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin changing their voting process in 2020 that is contrary to their election laws. I guess laws mean nothing to you.Bill Stepien, Bill Barr, Rudy Giuliani, and numerous others who were all President Trump supporters told him he lost the election. He lost every challenge in court. Every assistant AG in the country was going to resign when he was he was going to appoint a lackey. The “illegitimate process” wasn’t so illegitimate process wasn’t so illegitimate according to our courts. If you want to believe what you’re being fed so be it. I‘m listening to this with an open mind and it shows me that President Trump was attempting to subvert a legal election. I hope he stays out of the next election and we elect a good Republican.
So its your assertion that pulling wings off of flies is OK if you don't toss them afterward? Sick bastid.I resent that!
I have not, now, nor ever thrown an insect.
.
So its your assertion that pulling wings off of flies is OK if you don't toss them afterward? Sick bastid.
He throws a mean insect. Flies,
I don’t have the time or the inclination to review each of those cases, and I don’t have the expertise to overrule the judges who decided in them. Unless you think everybody in the country other than Donald Trump is corrupt then I Would have to conclude that the judges decided those cases fairly.I take it that you are okay with Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin changing their voting process in 2020 that is contrary to their election laws. I guess laws mean nothing to you.
And I haven't been fed anything, it is what I have seen, such as, a judge in Michigan ruled that the secretary of state violated the law when they unilaterally changed absentee voting rules. In Wisconsin the election commission violated numerous aspects of their absentee voting laws including allowing unverified ballots to be counted. In Georgia the election laws were violated by pre-counting absentee ballots before election day as required by law, the election board started counting 3-weeks prior without legislative authority. In Pennsylvania the election laws were violated when ballots were allowed to be accepted up to 3 days after the close of polls on election day.
Just so I understand you correctly, I read that as you don't care enough to look into the violations of the law, got it.I don’t have the time or the inclination to review each of those cases, and I don’t have the expertise to overrule the judges who decided in them. Unless you think everybody in the country other than Donald Trump is corrupt then I Would have to conclude that the judges decided those cases fairly.
As soon as I read this, I attribute it to "the rest of what I am about to say is my OPINION with nothing to back it up." Seems quite prevalent around here.I don’t have the time or the inclination to review....
That would be a fair assessment.Unless you think everybody in the country other than Donald Trump is corrupt
It’s not what I said. I did look into it but I’m not going to review every single allegation. Even if I did review every single case I don’t believe that I have the expertise which is better than those judges who decided themJust so I understand you correctly, I read that as you don't care enough to look into the violations of the law, got it.
No I think I’ve said what I have to back it up. I’m listening to the former Attorney General of the United States and most everybody in Trump‘s administration tell him that he lost the election. I am also listening to the court decisions that said they were no significant fraud in the elections.As soon as I read this, I attribute it to "the rest of what I am about to say is my OPINION with nothing to back it up." Seems quite prevalent around here.
Except almost every senior member of the Trump administration.
Slartibartfast.They do not think that. In fact, they know damn good and well that didn't happen.
Why you all trusting politicians to not lie?
No I think I’ve said what I have to back it up. I’m listening to the former Attorney General of the United States and most everybody in Trump‘s administration tell him that he lost the election. I am also listening to the court decisions that said they were no significant fraud in the elections.
I’d ask you the same thing are you saying Donald Trump is not a politician? His daughter said that she believes mobile. Why would I think his daughter is a liar?They do not think that. In fact, they know damn good and well that didn't happen.
Why you all trusting politicians to not lie?
So Donald Trump’s daughter said that she believes Bill Barr when he says that Trump Lost the election because she doesn’t want to get arrested. Yeah that sounds more reasonable than Donald Trump not telling the truth.Well, they most likely say that because those who don't get arrested.
Sure it is, you said that you didn't have the inclination to look into it, that means you do not care. And as to the judges rulings, most relied upon the doctrine of laches to dismiss, my understanding of those rulings was that it means there is no way to rectify the wrong at this point in time since the states had "certified" the elections. That in no way means that illegalities and irregularities did not occur.It’s not what I said. I did look into it but I’m not going to review every single allegation. Even if I did review every single case I don’t believe that I have the expertise which is better than those judges who decided them
I look to Bill Barr and other senior members of Trump’s administration who have started he lost the election.Sure it is, you said that you didn't have the inclination to look into it, that means you do not care. And as to the judges rulings, most relied upon the doctrine of laches to dismiss, my understanding of those rulings was that it means there is no way to rectify the wrong at this point in time since the states had "certified" the elections. That in no way means that illegalities and irregularities did not occur.
Really, you had to look to them? I looked at the counting of the electoral votes by Congress and the inauguration of Joe Biden as Trump lost the election. Neither of which address the illegalities and irregularities of how the election was conducted.I look to Bill Barr and other senior members of Trump’s administration who have started he lost the election.
Yes, because based on the court rulings there was no substantive irregularities in the 2020 election. I think Bill Barr said Trumps fraud claims were Bullshit. Most every senior member of Trumps administration agrees, including his daughter. So, the courts, most every senior member of Trumps administration believe there was no substantial fraud, but somehow, you would believe the election was stolen. At this point, I think you have made every argument you would make and I have expressed my opinion and how I formed it. I don’t think we are going to agree so I thank you for your input.Really, you had to look to them? I looked at the counting of the electoral votes by Congress and the inauguration of Joe Biden as Trump lost the election. Neither of which address the illegalities and irregularities of how the election was conducted.