Setting something on fire and inhaling it is absurd. It stinks, it's expensive and it, obviously, harms ones health. How can inhaling smoke not be harmful?
Smoking is relaxing, reduces stress, helps one concentrate, is a social thing or, at least used to be. It smells good. It tastes good. Over conversation, coffee, after sex, passing the time.
I enjoyed cigarettes, greatly, when I smoked. until I didn't enjoy it any more. However, I ALWAYS saw it as MY choice and never did I think, for even a second, it was, somehow, against my will when I fired up.
I think banning smoking in places where the goal is to ingest poison, aka 'bars' is one of the dumbest, most hypocritical things in the history of man. I think it is reasonable and fair to offer non smoking services and goods, from air travel and buses and movie theaters and grocery and clothing stores. Offer. Not impose. Public bus? Sure. Public building? Fine. We vote on it. Passed that, it is obviously unconstitutional to impose it on private property and people.
No time line of Nanny state expansion the last 30-40 years can be accurate absent the baseline control of accounting for the desire, and success, of government control over smoking.
The desire and affects of anti smoking legislation is NO different than Obamacare or all our other entitlements. At root of many of our ills is the extreme desire to tell others what to do and the inescapable other side of that coin; I am my brothers keeper. It permeates our politics. It is the unconstitutional core of our politics.
Search your feelings, Luke. You really want to tell people what to do, don't you?