PsyOps
Pixelated
its possible, not likely, but possible
And you base this on what? We haven't received anything on why this GJ was formed. You're doing the same thing you're laughing at people on the other side of this for doing - speculating.
its possible, not likely, but possible
And you base this on what? We haven't received anything on why this GJ was formed. You're doing the same thing you're laughing at people on the other side of this for doing - speculating.
I base it on the fact that there have been no
Reports of clinton folks being questioned by mueller.
But like I said, it's possible.
If he holds dual citizenship he is an American.
I doubt you'd say that if he was from a
Muslim nation.
You can doubt anything you like, and you will if it has to do with Trump.
You are a sick puppy.
We're not even supposed to know that another grand jury has been stood up; but the #### keeps leaking out. So, who knows what the heck is going on? Given that Mueller brought in a team of leftist Clintonites, I'm not too confident they are even going to entertain any evidence that may lead them in that direction.
I doubt you'd say that if he was from a
Muslim nation.
Come in dude. I know repeating the lie is fun and all, but other than trumps tweets what do you have that indicates mueller brought in a team of clintonites? The worst I have heard is that about a third may have made donations to democrats. That means the other 2/3 didn't.
No: It doesn't.
I'm not the racist, homophobic islamaphobe
Strap on your tinfoil hat
I don't know if that is a good idea. You seem to not be able to get yours off.
Come in dude. I know repeating the lie is fun and all, but other than trumps tweets what do you have that indicates mueller brought in a team of clintonites? The worst I have heard is that about a third may have made donations to democrats. That means the other 2/3 didn't.
Come on dude... you're the one who is absolutely convinced there is collusion; and you have yet to provide a source that supports this. Now you demand I provide a source for my claim? You're a typical 'do as I say not as I do' liberal.
They shouldn't be bringing lawyers and investigators that have shown any loyalty to any candidate. You love to operate on 'the mere hint of impropriety is evidence of guilty' when it fits you; so there you go... I am convinced that if there are any loyalists to Clinton involved in this investigation, it is tainted and can't be trusted.
Here is the difference. The investigators ostensibly admitted to their donations to democrats. Whereas the trump team lied about their meetings with Russians. Still, you haven't addressed the fact that 2/3 of the investigators did not make donations to the left, and very well may have donated to the right.
It's kind of like having a black mark on your record when you put in your security clearance. If tell the truth and it's not a disqualifying offense you are fine. However, even if it is minor and you lie about it you could be denied.
I don't need to justify anything to you, who can't produce evidence of collusion. You provide all sorts of non-related stuff the claim this is evidence.
Where in this post is evidence of collusion by Trump with the Russians to manipulate the election?
I think he's referring to the Leftist claim that Jr "lied" about meeting with the Russians, which we know he didn't. But they conveniently forget that his denial was to the question put to him whether he had any meetings to discuss specific topics.
Semantics, so bothersome
This all centers in on MR's belief that Trump colluded with the Russians. All of this non-related stuff is evidence to him that Trump colluded.