Mikeinsmd
New Member
1. "Reply with quote" is your friend.Michael Delaney said:Again, F1 is broadcast worldwide. It's television audience is 2 billion a year and it is broadcast in 200 countries. NASCAR's sudience is mainly only in the U.S. Kinda funny how you are bagging on the F1 drivers and stating that they are pansies. They are pure athletes unlike many of the drivers in NASCAR. I have yet to see an outta shape F1 driver, except for Montoya is getting chunky. Comparing F1 and NASCAR is apples and oranges. F1 is about technology and performance, unlike NASCAR.
Did you read the link? It is a great write up comparing the 2 forms of motorsports and the fans: http://www.speedtv.com/commentary/28732/ The fact is that F1 does contain the fastest closed course race cars in the world, with many of the fastest drivers in the world. Being a race car driver myself, I understand that a fast car is defined by it's ability to accelerate, corner and brake well, and that a fast car is not fast unless it has a fast driver in the cockpit.
2. Great write up????
3. Where do you get your statistics?? They are Even the last paragraph of your silly article states Nascar is bigger. Show me the stat that 2 billion watch F1. If it's true & Nascar is bigger, Nascar must have 8 billion per year watching.
That is the one of biggest pieces of biased garbage I ever read. Did this dolt overlook the documentary crabcake mentioned ?? Let me quote some things the article got right:
When you combine the two issues -- the fallout from the power of NASCAR’s popularity and NASCAR’s ability to devour other forms of motorsports
The problem isn’t so much that open-wheel racing has failed as it is that NASCAR has sucked all the air out of the room. Look at all of the general sports Web sites that link readers to “NASCAR“ for auto racing coverage. Not “motorsports,” not “auto racing,” just “NASCAR,” as if everything else in racing is just minor-league filler. Look at the airtime given the most blasé of NASCAR’s smoke-and-fire highlights during SportsCenter, then try to recall the last time you heard Allmendinger mentioned on the same show.
Big ratings and big crowds, of course, lead to big attention and big sponsorship. Only a handful of IRL or Champ Car teams can afford what Danica Patrick is about to be worth on the open market, and, even if she wants to stay, her opportunities are likely to be limited.
Either fight for what’s right about racing, what's so right about cars that can't even get close enough to rub??? or surrender to what appeals to the largest audience.
The bulk of NASCAR fans are reasonable, intelligent folk,
that NASCAR is superior to F1.
The rest of the article exposes the authors obvious sour grapes.is that NASCAR, in its monstrous growth, has become a viable alternative for other racers, even F1 racers.
The dummy doesn't realize that popularity = advertising dollars!! Hence F1 pales in comparison to Nascar. Try to spin it anyway you want but If F1 were 1/4 as popular, they'd get some press.....they're not. He even cries to ESPN to take notice of some driver (Allmendinger ) not exactly a household name, who won 3 his last 3 races.
Last edited: